Bennett, W. L., & Feldman, M. S. (1981). Reconstructing reality in the courtroom: Justice and judgment in American culture. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Carroll, J. S., Kerr, N. L., Alfini, J. J, Weaver, F. M., MacCoun, R. J., & Feldman, V. (1986). Free press and fair trial: The role of behavioral research. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 187-201.
Costantini, E., & King, J. (1980/81). The partial juror: Correlates and causes of prejudgment. Law and Society Review, 15, 9-40.
Costley, C. L. (1988). Meta-analysis of involvement research. Advances in Consumer Research, 15, 554-562.
Davis, R. W. (1986). Pretrial publicity, the timing of the trial, and mock jurors' decision processes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 590-607.
DeLuca, A. J. (1979). Tipping the scales of justice: The effects of pretrial publicity. Unpublished master's thesis, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
Dexter, H. R., Cutler, B. L., & Moran, G. (1992). A test of voir dire as a remedy for the prejudicial effects of pretrial publicity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 819-832.
Greene, E., & Wade, R. (1988). Of private talk and public print: General pretrial publicity and juror decision making. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2, 123-135.
Fulero, S. M. (1987). The role of behavioral research in the free press/fair trial controversy: Another view. Law and Human Behavior, 11, 259-264.
Fulero, S., Olsen-Fulero, L., & Wulff, K. (1991, June). Stability and structure of mediating story variables in rape juror decision making. Paper presented at the American Psychological Society convention, Washington, D. C.
Fulero, S., & Penrod, S. (1990). The myths and realities of attorney jury selection folklore and scientific jury selection: What works? Ohio Northern Law Review, 17, 229-253.
Hastie, R., Penrod, S., & Pennington, N. (1983). Inside the jury. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Hoiberg, B., & Stires, L. (1973). The effect of several types of pretrial publicity on the guilty attributions of simulated jurors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 3, 267-275.
Hvistendahl, J. K. (1979). The effect of placement of biasing information. Journalism Quarterly, 56, 863-865.
Kovera, M. (1994). The media and allegations of sexual misconduct: The effect of agenda-setting on appraisals of credibility. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Kramer, G. P., & Kerr, N. L. (1989). Laboratory simulation and bias in the study of juror behavior: A methodological note. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 89-100.
Kramer, G. P., Kerr, N. L., & Carroll, J. S. (1990). Pretrial publicity, judicial remedies, and jury bias. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 409-438.
Linz, D. & Penrod, S. (1992). Exploring the First and Sixth Amendments: Pretrial publicity and jury decision making. In D. K. Kagehiro & W. S. Laufer (Eds.), Handbook of psychology and law (pp. 3-20). New York: Springer-Verlag.
McGuire, W. J. (1985). Attitudes and attitude change. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 233-346). New York: Random House.
Moore, A. J. (1989). Trial by schema: Cognitive filters in the courtroom. UCLA Law Review, 37, 273-341.
Moran, G., & Cutler, B. L. (1991). The prejudicial impact of pretrial publicity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 345-367.
Moran, G., & Cutler, B. L. (1997). Bogus publicity items and the contingency between awareness and media-induced pretrial prejudice. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 339-344.
Mullin, C., Imrich, D., & Linz, D. (1989, August). The effects of date-rape information and prejudicial and nonprejudicial pretrial publicity on jury decision making in a sexual assault case. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association meeting, New Orleans, LA.
Nelson, M. D. (1972). Free press-fair trial: The effects of “sensational” and “non-sensational” pretrial news stories and of a judge's admonition upon “juror” and “non-juror” guilt assessment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Note. (1846). Trial by jury in New York. Law Reports, 9, 193-201.
Ogloff, J. R. P., & Vidmar, N. (1994). The impact of pretrial publicity on jurors. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 507-525.
Olsen-Fulero, L., & Fulero, S. (1997). Common sense rape judgments: An empathy-complexity theory of rape juror story making. Psychology, Public Policy, and the Law, 3, 402-427.
Olsen-Fulero, L., Fulero, S., & Wulff, K. (1989, August). Who did what to whom? Modeling rape jurors' cognitive processes. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association convention, New Orleans, LA.
Otto, A., Penrod, S., & Dexter, H. (1994). The biasing impact of pretrial publicity on juror judgments. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 453-462.
Otto, A., Penrod, S., & Hirt, E. (1990) The influence of pretrial publicity on juror judgments in a civil case. Unpublished manuscript.
Padawer-Singer, A., & Barton, A. H. (1975). The impact of pretrial publicity on jurors' verdicts. In R. J. Simon (Ed.), The jury system in America: A critical overview (pp. 123-139). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Pennington, N. (1981). Causal reasoning and decision making: The case of juror decisions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1981, August). Juror decision making: Story structure and verdict choice. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association convention, Los Angeles, CA.
Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1986). Evidence evaluation in complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 242-258.
Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1988). Explanation-based decision making: Effects of memory structure on judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 521-533.
Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1990). Practical implications of psychological research on juror and jury decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 90-105.
Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1991). A cognitive theory of juror decision making: The story model. Cardozo Law Review, 13, 519-557.
Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1992). Explaining the evidence: Tests of the story model for juror decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 189-206.
Polvi, N., Jack, L., Lyon, D. Laird, P., & Ogloff, J. (1996). Mock juror's verdicts in a child sexual abuse case: The effects of pretrial publicity. Paper presented at American Psychology-Law Society Conference, Hilton Head, S.C.
Riedel, R. (1973). Effects of pretrial publicity on male and female jurors and judges in a mock rape trial. Psychological Reports, 73, 819-832.
Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Simon, R. J. (1966). Murder, juries, and the press. Trans-Action, 1966 (May–June), 64-65.
Simon, R. J., & Eimermann, T. (1971). The jury finds not guilty: Another look at media influence on the jury. Journalism Quarterly, 48, 343-344.
Smith, V. L. (1991). Prototypes in the courtroom: Lay representations of legal concepts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 857-872.
Smith, V. L. (1993). When prior knowledge and law collide: Helping jurors use the law. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 507-536.
Steblay, N. M. (1992). A meta-analytic review of the weapon-focus effect. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 413-424.
Steblay, N. M. (1997). Social influence in eyewitness recall: A meta-analytic review of lineup instruction effects. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 283-297.
Studebaker, C. A., & Penrod, S. D. (1997). Pretrail publicity: The media, the law and common sense. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 3, 428-460.
Sue, S., Smith, R. E., & Gilbert, R. (1974). Biasing effects of pretrial publicity on judicial decisions. Journal of Criminal Justice, 2, 163-171.
Sue, S., Smith, R. E., & Pedroza, G. (1975). Authoritarianism, pretrial publicity and awareness of bias in simulated jurors. Psychological Reports, 37, 1299-1302.
Tans, M., & Chaffee, S. (1966). Pretrial publicity and juror prejudice. Journalism Quarterly, 43, 647-654.
Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352-373.