Skip to main content
Log in

Pseudoscience and Minority Religions: An Evaluation of the Brainwashing Theories of Jean-Marie Abgrall

  • Published:
Social Justice Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An analysis of Jean-Marie Abgrall's cultic brainwashing theory shows that the theory is essentially identical to the pseudoscientific theory that was developed first by the American CIA as a propaganda device to combat communism, and second as an ideological device for use by the American anti-cult movement to rationalize efforts at persecution and control of minority religious groups. The CIA theory has been evaluated scientifically in research in several contexts (i.e., communist coercive indoctrination of Western prisoners, the CIA's attempted development of brainwashing techniques, and with American new religions or “cults”). In each context, it has been shown to be ineffective in coercively changing worldviews. Because of this pattern of disconfirmation, testimony based on brainwashing theory has been opposed as unscientific by relevant professional academic organizations and repeatedly excluded from American legal trials. Consequently, neither legal decisions nor public policy with respect to minority religions should be based on Abgrall's appropriation of this pseudoscientific theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abgrall, J.-M. (1990). Rapport Sur “L'Eglise de Scientologie”: Les techniques de la Scientologie, la doctrine Dianetique, leurs consequences médico-legales (trans: “Report on the Church of Scientology: The Techniques of Scientology and the Doctrine of Dianetics, Their Medical-Legal Consequences”). Submitted in “Case for Criminal Prosecution for Fraud,” Case No. 90:6119074, Defendants: Isabelle Archer, et al., Higher Court of Marseilles. (Also submitted in another case in Lyon.)

  • Abgrall, J.-M. (1996). La Mécanique des Sectes, Documents Payot, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abgrall, J.-M. (1999a). Les sectes de l'apocalypse: Gourous de l'an 2000. Calmann-Levy, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abgrall, J.-M. (1999b). Soul Snatchers: The Mechanism of Cults, English translation of La Mécanique des Sectes, Algora, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association (1980). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd ed. (DSM III), American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed. (DSM IV), American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association et al. (1987). Amicus Curiae Brief in Molko and Leal vs. Holy Spirit Association, filed with the California Court of Appeal, Case no. A020935.

  • Anthony, D. (1989). Evaluating key testimony in trials involving brainwashing allegations against religious movements. In American Bar Association National Institute on Tort and Religion: Course Materials, ABA Division of Professional Education, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, D. (1990). Religious movements and brainwashing litigation: Evaluating key testimony. In Robbins, T., and Anthony, D. (eds.), In Gods We Trust, Transaction, New Brunswick, NJ, pp. 295–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, D. (1996). Brainwashing and Totalitarian Influence: An Exploration of Admissibility Criteria for Testimony in Brainwashing Trials, Doctoral Dissertation, Graduate Theological Union, Berkeley, CA (copies can be obtained from Ann Arbor, Michigan, UMI Dissertation Services).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, D. (2000). The pseudoscientific and totalistic character of the brainwashing paradigm: Legal implications and consequences. In Zablocki, B., and Robbins, T. (eds.), Misunderstanding Cults, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, D., and Robbins, T. (1992). Law, social science and the “brainwashing” exception to the First Amendment. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 10: 5–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, D., and Robbins, T. (1994). Brainwashing and Totalitarian Influence. In Ramachandran, V. S. (editor-in-Chief), Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, Academic Press, Division of Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Reprinted in Howard Friedman (editor-in-Chief), Encyclopedia of Mental Health, Academic Press, Division of Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1998.

  • Anthony, D., and Robbins, T. (1995a). Negligence, coercion, and the protection of religious belief. Journal of Church and State, 37: 509–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, D., and Robbins, T. (1995b). Religious totalism, violence and exemplary dualism. In Barkun, M. (ed.), Millennialism and Violence, a special issue of Terrorism and Political Violence, 7: 10–50.

  • Revised version published in 1974, Modern Medicine, 42.

  • Assemblée Nationale (1999). Rapport fait au nom de la Commission d' Enquête sur la situation financière, patrimoniale et fiscale des sectes, ainsi que sur leurs activites economiques et leurs relations avec les milieux economiques et l'Assemblée Nationale.

  • Bainbridge, W. S. (1999). The Sociology of Religious Movements, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, T. X. (1961). Antisocial and criminal acts induced by hypnosis: A review of experimental and clinical findings. The Archives of General Psychiatry, 5.

  • Barber, T. X. (1969). Hypnosis: A Scientific Approach, Litton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, E. (1984). The Making of a Moonie: “Brainwashing” or Choice? Basil Blackwell, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, E. (1989). New Religious Movements, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biderman, A. (1962). The image of “brainwashing.” Public Opinion Quarterly 26: 547–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, J. (1978). Pseudoscience and Mental Ability: The Origins and Fallacies of the IQ Controversy, Monthly Review Press, New York and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D. G. (1983). Conservatorships and deprogramming. In Bromley, D. G., and Richardson, J. T. (eds.), The Brainwashing/Deprogramming Controversy, Edwin Mellen, New York, pp. 267–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D. G. (1996). Listing (in black and white): Some observations on sociological thought reform. Nova Religio, 1: 250–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D. G., and Breschel, E. F. (1992). General population and institutional elite support for social control of new religions movements. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 10: 39–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D. G., and Shupe, A. (1981). Strange Gods: The Great American Cult Scare, Beacon, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broussard, P. (1999). L'enquête sur le Temple Solaire révèle le monde des sociétés secrètes (Solar Temple investigation exposes the world of secret societies). Le Monde, Dec. 24.

  • Campbell, R. (1981). Psychiatric Dictionary, 5th ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambre des Représentants de Belgique (1997). Enquête parlementaire visant à élaborer une politique en vue de lutter contre les pratiques illégales des sectes et les dangers qu'elles représentent pour la société et pour les personnes, particulièrement les mineurs d'âge. Rapport fait au nom de la Commission d'Enquête par MM. Duquesne et Willems, Bruxelles.

  • Chomsky, N. (1987). Psychology and ideology. In Peck, J. (ed.), The Chomsky Reader, Pantheon, New York, pp. 157–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J., Langone, M. et al. (1981). Destructive Cult Conversion: Theory, Research and Practice, Center on Destructive Cultism, American Family Foundation, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission d'Enquête sur les Sectes (1996). Les sectes en France: Rapport, Les Documents d'information de l'Assemblée Nationale, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Condon, R. (1958). The Manchurian Candidate, McGraw Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conn, J. (1982). The myth of coercion under hypnosis. In Zeig, J. (ed.) Eriksonian Approaches to Hypnosis and Psychotherapy, Brunner Mazel, New York, pp. 357–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, L. (1999). Comprehending Cults, Oxford University Press, Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dericquebourg, R. (1998). Scientology: Its cosmology, anthropology, system of ethics and methodologies. In Scientology: Theology and Practice of Contemporary Religion; A Reference Work Presented by the Church of Scientology, Bridge Publications, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, M. (1939). An experimental investigation of the possible anti-social use of hypnosis. Psychiatry, 2: 391–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, M. (1980). The Collected Papers of Milton H. Erikson on Hypnosis: Vol. I, Rossi, E. L. (ed.), Irvington, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1953–1974a). Standard Edition of the Complete Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 13: Totem and Taboo, Hogarth, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1953–1974b). Standard Edition of the Complete Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 21: The Future of an Illusion, Hogarth, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, E., and Shor, R. (1979). Hypnosis: Developments in Research and New Perspectives, Aldine, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1985). The Mind's New Science: A History of the Cognitive Revolution, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauld, A. (1992). A History of Hypnotism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, G., and Richardson, J. T. (1998). “Brainwashing” evidence in light of Daubert. In Reece, H. (ed.), Law and Science, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 265–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, L. (1994). What is real in the relationship? Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 41: 307–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunbaum, A. (1984). The Foundations of Psychoanalysis: A Philosophical Critique, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, E. (1951). Brainwashing in Red China, Vanguard, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, E. (1960). Brainwashing: From Pavlov to Powers, The Bookmaster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, A. (1958). Brave New World Revisited, Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Introvigne, M., and Melton, J. G. (eds.) (1996). Pour en finir avec les sectes. Le débat sur le rapport de la commission parlementaire, 3rd ed., Dervy, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Introvigne, M., and Richardson, J. T. (1999). “Brainwashing” theories in European parliamentary and administrative reports on “sects and cults.” Presented at Biannual Meeting of the International Society for the Scientific Study of Religion, Belgium, Louvain.

  • James, G. G. (1986). Brainwashing: The myth and the actuality. Thought: Fordham University Quarterly LXI(241): 241–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaminer, W. (1992). I'm Dysfunctional, You're Dysfunctional: The Recovery Movement and Other Self-Help Fashions. Addison-Wesley, Reading MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, S., and Liu, A. (1991). The Codependency Conspiracy, Warner, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch, I. (1995). Foreward to the 1995 Edition of T. X. Barber, Hypnosis: A Scientific Approach, Jason Aronson, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langone, M. (1997). Report in Francon Marini vs. Church of Gaia, District Court, County of Boulder, State of Colorado, Case No. 96-CV-1450, Division 5.

  • Langone, M. (1998). Deposition in Francon Marini vs. Church of Gaia, District Court, County of Boulder, State of Colorado, Case No. 96-CV-1450, Division 5.

  • Leahey, T., and Leahey, G. (1983). Psychology's Occult Doubles: Psychology and the Problem of Pseudoscience, Nelson Hall, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeMoult, J. (1978). Deprogramming members of religious sects. Fordham Law Review, 46: 599–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lifton, R. (1961). Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism: A Study of “Brainwashing” in China, Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machan, T. (1974). The PseudoScience of B. F. Skinner, Arlington House, New Rochelle, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magee, B. (1985). Philosophy and the Real World: An Introduction to Karl Popper, Open Court, LaSalle, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallinckrodt, B. (1996). Capturing the subjective and other challenges in measuring transference. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43(3).

  • Marks, J. (1980). The Search for the Manchurian Candidate, Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P. (1993). Post-cult recovery: Assessment and rehabilitation. In Langone, M. (ed.), Recovery from Cults, Norton, New York, pp. 201–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meerloo, J. (1956). The Rape of the Mind: The Psychology of Thought Control, Menticide, and Brainwashing, World Publishing Co., Cleveland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melton, J. G. (1999). Anti-cultists in the United States: An historical perspective. In Wilson, B., and Cresswell, J. (eds.), New Religious Movements, Routledge, New York, pp. 213–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, C. (1965). Hypnosis in Perspective, Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathan, D., and Snedeker, M. (1995). Satan's Silence: Ritual Abuse and the Making of a Modern American Witchhunt, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Hear, A. (1980). Karl Popper, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofshe, R., and Singer, M. (1986). Attacks on peripheral vs. central elements of the self and the impact of thought reform techniques. Cultic Studies Journal 3: 2–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orne, M. (1961). The potential uses of hypnosis in interrogation. In Biderman, A., and Zimmer, H. (eds.), The Manipulation of Human Behavior Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orne, M. (1962). Antisocial behavior and hypnosis. In Estabrooks, G. (ed.), Hypnosis: Current Problems, Harper and Row, New York. pp. 137–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paloutzian, R., Richardson, J. T., and Rambo, L. (1999). Religious conversion and personality change. Journal of Personality, 67: 1047–1079.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peele, S. (1989). Disseasing America: Addiction Treatment Out of Control, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Harper Torchbooks, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapping, E. (1996). The Culture of Recovery: Making Sense of the Self-Help Movement in Women's Lives, Beacon, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reber, A. (1995). The Penguin Dictionary of Psychology, 2nd ed., Penguin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J., and Kilbourne, B. (1983). Classical and contemporary applications of brainwashing models: A critique and comparison. In Bromley, D., and Richardson, J. (eds.), The Brainwashing/Deprogramming Controversy, Edwin Mellon, Lewiston, NY, pp. 29–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. T. (1991). Cult/brainwashing cases and the freedom of religion. Journal of Church and State 33: 55–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. T. (1992a). Public opinion and the tax evasion trial of Reverend Moon. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 10: 53–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. (1992a). Mental health of cult consumers: Legal and scientific controversies. In Schumaker, J. (ed.), Religion and Mental Health, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 233–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. T. (1993). A social psychological critique of “brainwashing” claims about recruitment to new religions. In Hadden, J., and Bromley, D. (eds.), The Handbook of Cults and Sects in America, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 75–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. T. (1996a). “Brainwashing” claims and minority religions outside the United States: Cultural diffusion of a questionable legal concept in the legal arena. Brigham Young University Law Review, 1996: 873–904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. T. (1996b). Sociology and the new religions: “Brainwashing,” “the courts, and religious freedom.” In Jenkins, P., and Kroll-Smith, S. (eds.), Witnessing for Sociology: Sociologists in Court, Praeger, Westport, CT, pp. 115–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. T., and Kilbourne, B. K. (1983). Classical and contemporary applications of brainwashing models. In Bromley, D. G., and Richardson, J. T. (eds.), The Brainwashing/Deprogramming Controversy, Edwin Mellen, New York, pp. 29–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, T. (1985). Cults, Converts, & Charisma, Sage Publications, Beverley Hills, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheflin, A., and Opton, E. (1978). The Mind Manipulators, Paddington, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. (1959). Brainwashing and totalitarianization in modern society. World Politics 2: 430–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. (1961). Coercive Persuasion, Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeburger, F. (1996). Addiction and Repsponsibility: An Inquiry into the Addictive Mind, Crossroad, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shermer, M. (1997). Why People Believe Weird Things: Pseudoscience, Superstition, and Other Confusions of Our Time, W. H. Freeman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shupe, A., and Bromley, D. G. (1980). The New Vigilantes, Sage, Beverley Hills, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M. (1983). Testimony in Robin and Marcia George v. International Society of Krishna Consciousness of California et al., 25-75-65, Orange County California Superior Court.

  • Singer, M., and Lalich, J. (1995). Cults in our Midst: The Hidden Menace in our Everyday Lives, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1972). Beyond Freedom and Dignity, Bantam/Vintage Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Society for the Scientific Study of Religion, et al. (1988). Amicus Curiae Brief for George v. ISKCON, filed with the California Appeal Court, Case No. D007153, 29 Feb.

  • Society for the Scientific Study of Religion, American Sociological Association, et al. (1989). Amicus Curiae Brief for David Molko and Tracy Leal v. Holy Spirit Association, et al., filed with US Supreme Court, Case no. 88-1600, 1 May.

  • Spanos, N. P. (1996). Multiple Identities and False Memories: A Sociocognitive Perspective, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavris, C. (1992). The Mismeasure of Women, Simon & Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timpanaro, S. (1998). Error's reign. In Crews, F. (ed.), Unauthorized Freud: Doubters Confront a Legend. Viking, New York, pp. 94–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victor, J. (1993). Satanic Panic: The Creation of a Contemporary Legend. Open Court, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallis, R. (1977). The Road to Total Freedom: A Sociological Analyisis of Scientology, Colombia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. B. (1924). Psychology from the Standpoint of a Behaviorist, 2nd ed., Lippincott, J. B. Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, L., and Singer, M. (1980). Cults, quacks, and nonprofessional therapies. In Kaplan, H., Freedman, A., and Sadock, B. (eds.), Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry—III, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, pp. 3245–3258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (1987). Leaving Cults, Society for the Scientific Study of Religion, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zablocki, B. (1998). Exit cost analysis: A new approach to the scientific study of brainwashing. Nova Religio 1: 216–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziskin, J. (1981). Coping with Psychiatric and Psychological Testimony, Law and Psychology Press, Venice, CA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anthony, D. Pseudoscience and Minority Religions: An Evaluation of the Brainwashing Theories of Jean-Marie Abgrall. Social Justice Research 12, 421–456 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022081411463

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022081411463

Navigation