The Impact of Families on Juvenile Substance Use Authors
Cite this article as: Amuedo-Dorantes, C. & Mach, T. Journal of Bioeconomics (2002) 4: 269. doi:10.1023/A:1021754313773 Abstract
This paper examines the effect of family composition on juvenile substance use and drug sales using data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1997. The results underscore the importance of having a father figure in the household in deterring juvenile smoking, marijuana use, and drug sale. However, the extent to which father figures affect juvenile substance use and drug sales varies according to their biological link to the youth and the youth's gender. Results further indicate that siblings and their involvement in substance use and drug sales significantly influence youths' own exposure to these delinquent practices.
biological parents siblings substance abuse
This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.
Baumrind, Diana C. 1986. Familial antecedents of adolescent drug use: A developmental perspective. In C. Jones, & R. Battjes (ed.) Etiology of Drug Abuse. NIDA Research Monograph # 56.
Block, Jack, Jeanne H. Block & Susan Keyes. 1988. Longitudinally foretelling drug usage in adolescence: Early childhood personality and environmental. Child Development 59:336–355.
Garis, Dalton. 1998. Poverty, single-parent households, and youth at-risk behavior: An empirical study. Journal of Economic Issues 32(4):1079–1105.
Glaeser, Edward L. & Bruce Sacerdote. 1999. Why is there more crime in cities? Journal of Political Economy 107(6):S225-S258.
Grogger, Jeff. 1998. Market wages and youth crime. Journal of Labor Economics 16(4):756–791.
Hawkins, J.David, Richard Catalano & Janet Y. Miller. 1992. Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: Implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychological Bulletin 112(1):64–105.
Johnson, Robert A., John P. Hoffman & Dean R. Gerstein. 1996. The relationship between family structure and adolescent substance use. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, Maryland.
Johnston, Lloyd D., Patrick M. O'Malley & Jerald G. Bachman. 1999. National survey results on drug use from the Monitoring the Future Study, 1975–1997. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, NIDA. Publication No. 98–4346.
Levitt, Steven D. 1998. Why do increased arrest rates appear to reduce crime: Deterrence, incapacitation, or measurement error? Economic Inquiry 36(3):353–372.
Neal, Derek. 1997. The effect of catholic secondary schooling on educational attainment. Journal of Labor Economics 15(1):98–123.
Shedler, Jonathan & Jack Block. 1990. Adolescent drug use and psychological health: A longitudinal inquiry. American Psychologist 45:612–630.
U.S. Dept. of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation. UNIFORM CRIME REPORTING PROGRAM DATA [UNITED STATES]: COUNTY-LEVEL DETAILED ARREST AND OFFENSE DATA, 1995 [Computer file]. ICPSR ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [producer and distributor], 1997.
Witte, Ann Dryden & Helen Tauchen. 1994. Work and crime: An exploration using panel data. Public Finance 49(0):155–167.
Yamada, Tetsuji, Michael Kendix & Tadashi Yamada. 1996. The impact of alcohol consumption and marijuana use on high school graduation. Health Economics 5(1):77–92.
CrossRef Copyright information
© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002