Abrahamson, N.A. and Litehiser, J.J., 1989, Attenuation of vertical peak acceleration, Bull. Seis. Soc. Am.
, 549–580.Google Scholar
Boore, D.M., 1983, Stochastic simulation of high frequency ground motion based on seismological models of radiated spectra, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.
, 1865–1894.Google Scholar
Boore, D.M. and Atkinson, C.M., 1987, Stochastic prediction of ground motion and spectral response parameters at hard rock sites in eastern north America, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.
, 440–467.Google Scholar
Campbell, K.W., 1997, Empirical near source attenuation relationships for horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and pseudo absolute acceleration response spectra, Seism. Res. Lett.
, 154–179.Google Scholar
Campbell, K.W., 2000, Erratum to ‘Empirical near source attenuation relationships for horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and pseudo-absolute acceleration response spectra’ by Kenneth W. Camp-bell, Seism. Res. Lett.
, 353–355.Google Scholar
Chandrasekaran, A.R. and Das, J.D., 1992, Analysis of strong ground motion accelerogram of Uttarkashi Earthquake of October 20, 1991, Bull. Indian Soc. of Earthquake Tech.
, 35–55.Google Scholar
Chandrasekaran, A.R. and Das, J.D., 1991, Analysis of strong ground motion accelerograms of Uttarkashi earthquake of October 20, 1991, EQ 91-10, Department of Earthquake Engineering, University of Roorkee, Roorkee, India.Google Scholar
Cocco, M. and Boatwright, J., 1993, The envelopes of acceleration time histories, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am.
, 1095–1114.Google Scholar
EERI, 1999, The Chamoli, India, earthquake of March 29, 1999, EERI Special earthquake report downloaded from internet (http://www.eeri.org/Reconn/Chamoli99/Chamoli032999.html)
Hartzell, S.H., 1978, Earthquake aftershocks as green functions, Geoph. Res. Lett.
5, 1–4.Google Scholar
Hartzell, S.H., 1982, Simulation of ground accelerations for May 1980 Mammoth Lakes, California earthquakes, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.
, 2381–2387.Google Scholar
Hadley, D.M. and Helmberger, D.V., 1980, Simulation of strong ground motions, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.
, 617–610.Google Scholar
Hanks, T.C. and McGuire, R.K., 1981, Character of high frequency ground motion, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.
, 2071–2095.Google Scholar
Housner, G.W. and Jemiings, P.C., 1964, Generation of artificial earthquakes, Proc. ASCE
, 113–150.Google Scholar
Hutchings, L., 1985, Modelling earthquakes with empirical green's functions (abs), Earthquake Notes
, 14.Google Scholar
Irikura, K., 1983, Semi empirical estimation of strong ground mo-tion during large earthquakes, Bull. Dis. Prev. Res. Inst. (Kyoto Univ.)
, 63–104.Google Scholar
Irikura, K., 1986, Prediction of strong acceleration motion using empirical greens function, Proc. 7th Japan Earthquake Enging. Symp., pp. 151–156.
Irikura, K. and Muramatu, I., 1982, Synthesis of strong ground motions from large earthquakes using observed seismograms of small events, Proc. 3rd Int. Microzonation Conprence, Seattle, pp. 447–458.
Jain, A.K. and Chander, R., 1995, Geodynamic models for Uttarkashi earthquake of October 20, 1991, Uttarkashi Earthquake, Geol. Soc. India, pp. 225–233.
Joshi, A., 1997, Modelling of peak ground acceleration for Uttarkashi earthquake of 20th October, 1991, Bull. Ind. Soc. Earthquake Tech.
, 75–96.Google Scholar
Joshi, A. and Patel, R.C., 1997, Modelling of active lineaments for predicting possible earthquake scenario around Dehradun, Garhwal Himalaya, India, Tectonophysics
, 289–310.Google Scholar
Joshi, A., 1998, Study of the Uttarkashi earthquake in terras of rupture model and isoseismals, J. Geophys.
, 133–140.Google Scholar
Joshi, A., Kumar, B., Sinvhal, A. and Sinvhal, H., 1999, Generation of synthetic accelerograms by modelling of rupture plane, J. Indian Soc. Earthqua. Tech.
, 43–60.Google Scholar
Joshi, A., 2000, Modelling of rupture planes for peak ground accelerations and its application to the isoseismal map of MMI scale in Indian region, J. Seismol.
, 143–160.Google Scholar
Joshi, A., Singh, S. and Girothi, Kavita, (2001), The simulation of ground motions using envelope summations, Pure Appl. Geophys.
, 877–901.Google Scholar
Joshi, A. and Midorikawa, S., 2001, Attenuation characteristics of ground motion intensity from earthquakes with intermediate depth, PAGEOPH (Communicated).
Kamae, K. and Irikura, K., 1992, Prediction of site specific strong ground motion using semi empirical methods, Earthquake Enging. 10th World Conf., pp. 801–806.
Kameda, H. and Sugito, M., 1978, Prediction of strong earthquake motions by evolutionary process model, Proc. 6th Japan Earthquake Enging. Symp., pp. 41–48.
Kanamori, H., 1979, A semi empirical approach to prediction of long period ground motions from great earthquakes, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.
, 1645–1670.Google Scholar
Kanamori, H. and Anderson, D.L., 1975, Theoretical basis of some empirical relation in seismology, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.
, 1073–1095.Google Scholar
Kumar, D., Teotia, S.S. and Khattri, K.N., 1997, The representation of attenuation characteristics of strong ground motions observed in the 1986 Dharamsala and 1991 Uttarkashi earthquakes by available empirical relations, Curr. Sci.
, 543–548.Google Scholar
Lai, S.P., 1982, Statistical characterization of strong ground motions using power spectral density function, Bull. Seismol. Soe. Am.
, 259–274.Google Scholar
Lay, T. and Wallace, T.C., 1995, Modern Global Seismology
, Academic Press, California, pp. 521.Google Scholar
Lee, W.H.K. and Stewart, S.W., 1981, Principles and Applications of Micro-earthquake Network
s, Academic Press, New York, pp. 293.Google Scholar
Mandal, P., Pandy, S., Rastogi, B.K., Satyanarayana, H.V.S., Kous-alya, M., Vijayaghavan, R. and Srinivasan, A., 2001, Aftershock activity and frequency dependent low coda Qc in the epicentral region of the 1999 Chamoli earthquake of Mw 6.4, Pure App. Geophys.
, 1719–1735.Google Scholar
McGuire, R.K., 1977, Seismic design spectra and mapping procedures using hazard analysis based directly on oscillator response, J. Earthquake Eng. Strut. Dyn.
, 211–234.Google Scholar
Mendoza, C. and Hartzell, S., 1988, Inversion for slip distribution using teleseismic P waveforms, North Palm Springs, Borah Peak, and Michoacan earthquakes, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.
, 1092–1111.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, R.P., 1993, Pressure, temperature and time constraints on metamorphism across the Main Central Thrust zone and High Himalayan Slab in Garhwal Himalaya, Himalayan Tectonics, Geol. Soc. Sp. Publ.
74, In: Treloar, P.J. and Searle, M.P. (eds.), pp. 485–510.
Midorikawa, S. and Kobayashi, H., 1978, On estimation of strong earthquake motions with regards to fault, In: Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. on Microzonation
, pp. 825–836.Google Scholar
Midorikawa, S., 1993, Semi empirical estimation of peak ground acceleration from large earthquakes, Tectonophysics
, 287–295.Google Scholar
Midorikawa, S., 1989, Synthesis of ground acceleration of large earthquake using acceleration envelope waveform of small earthquake, J. Struct. Const. Enging.
, 23–30 (Japanese).Google Scholar
Mikumo, T., Irikura, K. and Imagawa, K., 1981, Near field strong motion synthesis front foreshock and aftershock records and rupture process of the main shock fault, (abs.), IASPEI 21st General Assembly, London.
Mugnuia, L. and Brune, J.M., 1984, Simulations of strong ground motions for eathquakes in the Mexicali-Imperial valley, Proc. of workshop on Strong Ground Motion Simulation and Earthquake Engng. Appl
., Pub. 85-02 Earthquake Engineering Research Institue, Los Altos, California, 21-1-21-19.Google Scholar
Negi, R.S., Nawani, P.C., Rawat, J.S., Agarwal, K.K., Sawat, P.V., Gairola, B.M., Tripathi, S.K., Khanduri, K.C., Singh, Bhupendra, Dangwal, D.P., 1999, Macroseismic effects and related geotechnical problems caused by Chamoli earthquake on 29th March, 1999 in parts of Garhwal Himalaya, (Abs.), Workshop on Chamoh earthquake and its impact, Department of Science and Technologe, India.
Pande, P., Singh, R.K., Gupta, S.K., Joshi, K.C., 1999, A Review of seismotectonics of Garhwal HimalayaAn explanation of the mechanics of 29th March, 1999 Chamoli earthquake, (Abs.), Workshop on Chamoli earthquake and its impact, Department of Science and Technology, India.
Paul, S.K., Rautela, P. and Lakhera, R.C., 1999, Interrelationship of co-seismic fractures with tectonic setup of the area: A study of 28th March, 1999 Chamoli earthquake, (Abs.), Workshop on Chamoli earthquake and its impact, Department of Science and Technology, India.
Rastogi, B.K., 2000, Chamoli earthquake of Magnitude 6.6 on 29 March, 1999, J. Geol. Soc. India
, 505–514.Google Scholar
Saikia, C.K. and Herrmann, R.B., 1985, Application of wave-form modelling to determine focal mechanisms of four 1982 Miramichi aftershocks, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am.
, 1021–1040.Google Scholar
Saikia, C.K., 1993, Ground motion studies in Great Los Angles due to Mw = 7.0 Earthquake on the Elysian Thrust Fault, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am.
, 780–810.Google Scholar
Sharma, M.L., 1998, Attenuation relationship for estimation of peak ground horizontal acceleration using data from strong motion array in India, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am.
, 1063–1069.Google Scholar
Spudich, P., Joyner, W.B., Lindh, A.G., Boore, D.M., Margaris, B.M. and Fletcher, J.B., 1999, SEA99: A revised groiuid motion prediction relation for use in extensional tectonic regimes, Bull. Seim. Soc. Am.
, 1156–1170.Google Scholar
Thakur, V.C. and Rohella, R.K., 1999, Geodynamic model for Chamoli earthquake of March 29, 1999 and seismic hazard assesment in the Garhwal Kumaon region, Workshop on Chamoli earthquake and its impact, Department of Science and Technology, India.
Trifunac, M.D. and Brady, A.G., 1975, A study on the duration of strong earthquake ground motion, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.
, 581–627.Google Scholar
Valdiya, K.S., 1977, Structural setup of the Kumaon lesser Himalaya, In: Himalayan Secience de la terre, Centre Nationale Richerche Science, Paris
, 449–462.Google Scholar
Wells, L.D. and Coppersmith, K.J., 1994, New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area and surface displacement, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.
, 974–1002.Google Scholar
Youngs, R.R., Chious, S.J., Silva, W.J. and Humphrey, J.R., 1997, Strong motion attenuation relationships for subduction zone earthquakes, Seism. Res. Lett.
, 58–73.Google Scholar
Yu, G., 1994, Some aspect of earthquake seismology: slip partitioning along major convergent plate boundaries; composite source model for estimation of strong motion; and nonlinear soil response modelling, Ph.D. thesis, University of Nevada, Reno
Yu, G., Khattri, K.N., Andersom, J.G., Brune, J.N. and Zeng, Y., 1995, Strong ground motion from the Uttarkashi earthquake, Himalaya, India, Earthquake: Comparison of Observations with Synthetics Using the composite source model, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.
, 31–50.Google Scholar
Zeng, Y., Anderson, J.G. and Su, F., 1994, A composite source model for computing realistic synthetic strong ground motions, Geophys. Res. Lett.
, 725–728.Google Scholar