The “Good Cause Norm” in Employment Relations: Empirical Evidence and Policy Implications
- Mark V. Roehling
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Critics of the American employment at-will doctrine have argued that it should be abandoned because it is at odds with a societal level norm that employees should only be discharged for good reasons (the “good cause norm”). This paper examines the extent to which there is conceptual and empirical support for the existence of such a norm. Theoretical perspectives supporting the norms existence are discussed and integrated, and an interdisciplinary review of relevant research is provided. In light of the support that is found for the existence of a good cause norm in the American workplace, it is proposed that the current employment at-will default rule be changed to a waivable employee right to be discharged for good cause only.
- Ballam, D. A. (2000). Employment at-will: The impending death of a doctrine. American Business Law Journal, 37, 653.
- Blades, L. E. (1967). Employment at-will vs. individual freedom: On limiting the abusive exercise of employer power. Columbia Law Review, 67, 104.
- Boswell, W. R., Moynihan, L. M., Roehling, M. V., & Cavanaugh, M. A. (2001). Responsibilities in the “new employment relationship”: An empirical test of an assumed phenomenon. Journal of Managerial Issues, 13(3), 307–327.
- Callahan, E. S. (1990). Employment at will: The relationship between societal expectations and the law. American Business Law Journal, 28, 455–484.
- Civil Rights Act of 1991, Pub. L. No. 102-166, 105 Stat. 1071 (codified in different sections of 42 U.S.C., 29 U.S.C., and 2 U.S.C.).
- Eastman, W. (1997). Overestimating oneself and overlooking the law: Psychological supports for employment at will. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 10, 21–35.
- Edelman, L., B., Abraham, S., & Erlanger, H. S. (1992). Professional construction of the law: The inflated threat of wrongful discharge. Law and Society Review, 26, 47–83.
- Epstein, R. A. (1984). In defense of contract at will. University of Chicago Law Review, 51, 947–982.
- Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row & Peterson.
- Folger, R. (1993). Reactions to mistreatment at work. In Murnighan, K. (Ed.), Social Psychology in Organizations: Advances in Theory and Research, 161–183. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Forbes, F. S., & Jones, I. M. (1986). A comparative, attitudinal, and analytical study of the dismissal of at-will employees without cause. Labor Law Journal, 157–166.
- Greene v. Howard University, 412 F.2d 1128 (D.C. Cir. 1969).
- Grodin, J. (1990). Toward a wrongful termination statute for California. Hastings Law Journal, 42, 135–163.
- Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1990). Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 1325–1348. CrossRef
- Kim, P. T. (1997). Bargaining with imperfect information: A study of worker perceptions of legal protection in an at-will world. Cornell Law Review, 89, 105–155.
- Kim, P. T. (1999). Norms, learning, and law: Exploring the influences of workers' knowledge. University of Illinois Law Review, 447–515.
- Knetsch, J. L., & Sinden, J. A. (1984).Willingness to pay and compensation demanded Experimental evidence of an unexpected disparity in measures of values. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 99(3), 507–521.
- Leonard, A. S. (1988). A new common law of employment termination. North Carolina Law Review, 66, 631–686.
- Macneil, I. R. (1980). The new social contract. New Haven: Yale University Press.
- Million, D. (1998). Default rules, wealth distribution, and corporate law: Employ at-will job security. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 146, 975–1041.
- Model Employment Termination Act (1991, December). 9A Labor Relations Reporter. Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs.
- Montanta Code Annotated (1997). 39-2-901 to 39-2-914 (originally enacted as 1987 Montana Laws 641).
- Rock, E. B., & Wachter, M. L. (1996). The enforceability of norms and the employment relationship. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 144, 1913–1952.
- Roehling, M. V., & Winters, D. (2000). Job security rights: The effects of specific policies and practices on the evaluation of employers. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 12, 25–38.
- Ross, L., Leppard, M., & Hubbard, M. (1975). Perseverance in self-perceptions and social perceptions: Biased attribution processes in the debriefing paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 880–892.
- Rousseau, D. M., & Anton, R. J. (1988). Fairness and implied contract obligations in job terminations: A policy capturing study. Human Performance, 1(4), 273–289.
- Rousseau, D. M., & Anton, R. J. (1991). Fairness and implied contract obligations in job terminations: The role of contributions, promises, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 12, 287–299.
- Rousseau, D. M., & Aquino, K. (1993). Fairness and implied contract obligations in job terminations: The role of remedies, social accounts, and procedural justice. Human Performance, 6(2), 135–149.
- Samuleson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decisionmaking. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 7–33.
- Schein, E. H. (1980). Organizational psychology. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Schmedeman, D. A., & McLean Parks, J. (1994). Contract formation and employee handbooks: Legal, psychological, and empirical analyses. Wake Forest Law Review, 29, 647–718.
- Schwab, S. (1988). A Coasean experiment on contract presumptions. Journal of Legal Studies, 17, 237–268.
- Schwartz, A. (1992). Relational contracts in court: An analysis of incomplete agreements and judicial strategies. Journal of Legal Studies, 21, 271–318.
- Schwoerer, C., & Rosen, B. (1989). Effects of employment at-will policies and compensation polices on corporate image and job pursuit intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 653–656.
- Summers, C. (2000). Employment at-will in the United States: The divine right of employers. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Labor and Employment Law, 3, 65–85.
- Tompkins, J. (1988). Legislating the employment relationship: Montana's wrongful-discharge law. Employee Relations Law Journal, 14, 387–398.
- Verkerke, J. H. (1995). An empirical perspective on indefinite term contracts: Resolving the just cause debate. Wisconsin Law Review, 4, 837–918.
- Wayland, R. F., Clay, J. M., & Payne, P. L. (1993). Employment at will statements: Perceptions of job applicants. International Journal of Manpower, 14, 22–33.
- Witt, J. F. (1999). Rethinking the nineteenth-century employment contract, again. Law and History Review, 18, 627–657.
- Workers Readjustment and Retraining Notification Act (1994). 29 U.S.C., Sections 2101–2109.
- Youngblood, S. A., Trevino, L. K., & Favia, M. (1992). Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 5, 283–307.
- The “Good Cause Norm” in Employment Relations: Empirical Evidence and Policy Implications
Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal
Volume 14, Issue 2-3 , pp 91-104
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
- Additional Links
- employment at-will
- employment law
- employee discharge
- good cause
- Industry Sectors
- Mark V. Roehling (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. School of Labor and Industrial Relations, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan