Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of Preservation Methods for Nutrient Species Collected by Automatic Samplers

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Automatic samplers are a common method of data collection for numerous monitoring projects in the South Florida region and elsewhere. Although total phosphorus (TP) is the primary parameter of interest within this region, nitrogen species such as ammonia nitrogen (NH4-N), nitrate+nitrite nitrogen (NOx-N), and total kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) are also collected and analyzed. Federal and state quality assurance guidelines require nutrient samples to be preserved by acidification with H2SO4 to a pH < 2 and stored immediately at 4 °C. However, the remoteness of manysampling locations in South Florida makes it difficult to supplyelectricity for the refrigeration of samples collected by autosamplers. In addition, the use of propane-powered refrigerated autosamplers is a costly and ineffective solution in the South Florida climate. Consequently, while samples collected at these remote locations are routinely pre-preservedwith acid, they are not cooled to 4 °C for a period fromone to seven days. This study evaluated if a statistically significant difference (α = 0.05) existed between concentrations of nitrogen species from a common source samplethat was either: processed immediately; refrigerated to 4 °C for seven days; or not refrigerated for seven days.In all cases, the collected sample was pre-preserved by adding 1 mL of 50% H2SO4 to each 1 L discrete sample container before each 7 day testing period. Differences in concentrations of the calculated parameter total nitrogen (TN)were also investigated.Analyses using the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test showed no significant differences among the three treatment groups for NOx-N, TKN, TN and TP. Significant differences were observedwhen the NH4-N samples that were processed immediately werepaired with NH4-N samples that were left unrefrigerated or refrigerated for seven days. Information from this study can be used by researchers and managers in evaluating the usefulness of nutrient water quality data that is collected when sample refrigeration is not available.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Public Health Association: 1992, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th ed., American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Analytical Quality Control (Harmonised Monitoring) Committee: 1984, 'Sample Collection, Preservation and Storage. Analytical Quality Control in the Hormonised Monitoring Scheme', Water Research Centre, Technical Report TR214, 21 pp.

  • Fishman, M. J. Schroder, L. J. and Shockey, M. W.: 1986, 'Evaluation of methods for preservation of water samples for nutrient analysis', Intern. J. Environ. Stud. 26, 231–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida Department of Environmental Protection: 1992, DEP Standard Operating Procedures for Laboratory Operations and Sample Collection Activities, DEP-QA-001/1992. Quality Assurance Section, FDEP, Tallahassee, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, J. S. and Schenk, G. H.: 1979, Quantitative Analytical Chemistry: 4th ed., Allyn and Bacon, Inc., Boston, London, Sydney, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosser, L.: 1997, 'Filtration vs. Non-Filtration Test', (in print), Division of Water Quality Monitoring, South Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotlash, A. R. and Chessman, B. C.: 1998, 'Effects of Water Sample Preservation and Storage on Nitrogen and Phosphorus Determinations: Implications for the Use of Automated Sampling Equipment', Wat. Res. 32(12), 3731–3737.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott, Lyman.: 1984. An Introduction to Statistical Methods and Data Analysis, 2nd ed., PWS Publishers, Boston, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, C. J. and Gilroy, E. J.: 1998, 'Nutrient Preservation Experiment: Design, Statistical Analysis and Interpretation of Analytical Results', U.S. Geological Survey: Water Resources Investigations Report 98-4118.

  • Patton, C. J. and Truitt, E. P.: 1995, 'Nutrient Preservation Experiment: Nutrient Concentration Data for Surface, Ground and Municipal Supply Water Samples and Quality-Assurance Samples', U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 95–141.

  • Philbert, F. J.: 1973, 'The Effect of Sample Preservation by Freezing Prior to Chemical Analysis of Great LakesWaters', Proceedings of the 16th Conference Great Lakes Research, Internat. Assoc. Great Lakes Res., pp. 282–293.

  • Salley, B. A., Bradshaw, J. G. and Neilson, B. J.: 1986, 'Results of Comparative Studies of Preservation Techniques for Nutrient Analysis on Water Samples', U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, CBP/TRS 6/87.

  • South Florida Water Management District: 1999, 'SFWMD Comprehensive Quality Assurance Plan, WRE Inventory #383'. Department of Water Resource Evaluation, SFWMD, West Palm Beach, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thayer, G. W.: 1970, 'Comparison of two storage methods for analysis of nitrogen and phosphorus fractions in estuarine water', Chesapeake Sci. 11(3), 155–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turtola, E.: 1989, 'Effect of storage and sulphuric acid addition on analytical results of nitrogen and phosphorus in water samples containing eroded material', Aqua Fennica 19(2), 109–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: 1993, 'Methods for the Determination of Inorganic Substances in Environmental Samples', Cincinnati, Ohio, Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, EPA/600/R-93/100, August 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: 1999, Protocol for Developing Nutrient TMDLs. EPA 841-B-99-007. Office ofWater (4503F), United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington D.C., 135 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Geological Survey: 1999, TWRI. Book 9: National Field Manual for the Collection of Water-Quality Data, F. D. Wilde, D. B. Rodtke, Jacob Gibs and R. T. Iwatsubo (eds), Chapter 4A, 152 p.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricia M. Burke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burke, P.M., Hill, S., Iricanin, N. et al. Evaluation of Preservation Methods for Nutrient Species Collected by Automatic Samplers. Environ Monit Assess 80, 149–173 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020660124582

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020660124582

Navigation