Selection and Prioritisation Procedure of Hazardous Substances for the Marine Environment within OSPAR/DYNAMEC Article DOI:
Cite this article as: Wiandt, S. & Poremski, HJ. Ecotoxicology (2002) 11: 393. doi:10.1023/A:1020569608441 Abstract
In 1998, the contracting parties to the OSPAR Convention agreed on a “Strategy with regard to Hazardous Substances”: [...]
the prevention of pollution of the maritime area by continuously reducing discharges, emissions and losses of hazardous substances thereby moving towards the target of their cessation within one generation (25 years, year 2020) [...]. In OSPAR, an ad-hoc working group on the development of a dynamic selection and prioritisation mechanism for hazardous substances (called DYNAMEC) has developed a dynamic selection and prioritisation scheme for the marine environment. The approach taken within OSPAR and DYNAMEC to implement the political agreement into practical instruments is summarised in the following. OSPAR DYNAMEC hazardous substances prioritisation selection PBT criteria References
DYNAMEC (1998). Development of a dynamic selection and prioritisation mechanism for hazardous substances with regard to the marine compartment. Presented by Germany DYNAMEC 98/4/1, Berlin, 14–16. September 1998.
DYNAMEC (1999a). Report on the intersessional work on the initial selection presented by the Nordic countries. DYNAMEC (2) 99/3/1, Stockholm, 7–10 September 1999.
DYNAMEC (1999b). Summary record DYNAMEC (2)99, Annex 6: draft framework for a common OSPAR/EC approach on risk assessment methodology for the marine environment. Stockholm, 7–13 September 1999.
EU TGD (1996). Technical guidance documents. ECB, Ispra, Italy, 19 April 1996.
Fraunhofer-Institut (1996). Revised proposal for a list of priority substances in the context of the Water Framework Directive (COMMPS Procedure). Draft Final Report. Declaration ref.: 98/788/3040/DEB/E1, Fraunhofer-Institut, Umweltchemie und Ökotoxikologie, Schmallenberg.
Hansen, G.G., van Haelst, A.G., van Leeuwen, K., Van der V. Zandt, (1999). Priority setting for existing chemicals. The European Union Risk Ranking Method.
Environ. Tox. Chem.
Lepper, P. (2000). Draft version of 5 January 2000: results of the risk-based ranking of substances on the DYNAMEC “Draft Initial List of Possible Concern”. DYNAMEC 00/4/1, Oslo, 2–4 February 2000.
Moltmann, J.F., Küppers, K., Knacker, T., Klöppfer, W., Schmidt, E. and Renner, I. (1999). Development of a concept for the evaluation of hazardous substances in the marine environment within the framework of the OSPAR Convention. Research Report no. 297 25 525/01–02 on behalf of the Federal Environmental Agency.
OSPAR Commission (1999). OSPAR strategy with regard to hazardous substances, Sintra (Portugal). 22–23 July 1998, Annex 34.
OSPAR Convention: Bundesgesetzblatt (1994). Teil II.S. 1355 ff.
Poremski, H.-J. and Wiandt, S. (2000). OSPAR programmes on hazardous Substances—dynamic selection and prioritisation procedure. GDCh-Monographie, Band 17, pp. 55–70.
© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002