Empirical Measurement of the Effects of Cultural Diversity on Software Quality Management
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
The difficulties of achieving social acceptance for Software Quality Management systems have been underestimated in the past, and they will be exacerbated in the future by the globalization of the software market and the increasing use of cross-cultural development teams within multinational companies. Management that can take account of the cultural context of their endeavours will improve understanding, minimize risk and ensure a higher degree of success in improvement programs within the software industry.
This paper addresses cross-cultural issues in Software Quality Management. Qualitative and quantitative research was carried out in five European countries by using a postal questionnaire. Empirical measures of organizational culture, national culture and their interdependence, are presented together with interim instruments developed for the purpose of classifying organizations. Verification of the statistical results from the survey was carried out by triangulation, which included qualitative research methods in the form of interviews and observation. Cultural factors, which may have bearing on successful adoption and implementation of Software Quality Management were identified, and an assessment model, has been developed for use by organizations developing software in different parts of the world. The intention is that the recommendations following from the assessment will lead to greater cultural awareness in addressing quality, and will provide stimulus for improvement. The model's aims is to predict to what degree there is a fit between the organizational and the national culture, and to give recommendations and guidelines for software process improvement.
- Adler, N.J. 1997. International Dimensions of Organizational Behavior, Ohio, South Western College Publishing.
- Curtis, B., Heflleey, W.E., and Miller, S. 1995. Overview of the People Capability Maturity Model, CMU/SEI_95-MM-01.
- Haase, V.H. 1992. Bootstrap—measuring software management capabilities, First findings in Europe, Fourth IAFC/IFIP Workshop, Wien, Austria.
- Haase, V.H.and Messnarz, R.1994. Bootstrap, fine-tuning process assessment, IEEE Software. July pp. 25–35.
- Hirschheim, R.A. Information Systems Epistemology: An Historical Perspective In Information Systems Research, Issues, Methods and Practical Guidelines, Galliers (Ed.), Blackwell Scientific Publications.
- Hoecklin, L. 1995. Managing Cultural Differences, Strategies for Competitive Advantage, New York, U.S.A., Addison-Wesley Publishers Ltd.
- Hofstede, G. 1983. The cultural relativity of organizational practices and theories, J. Int. Business Studies, Fall, pp. 75–92.
- Hofstede, G. 1984. Culture 's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values, London, Sage Publications.
- Hofstede, G. 1985. The interaction between national and organizational value system, J. of Management Studies. 22: 347–357.
- Hofstede, G. 1994. Cultures and Organizations, Intercultural Cooperation and Its Importance for Survival, Software of the Mind, Berkshire, U.K., McGraw-Hill International.
- Hofstede, G., Neuijen, B., Ohayv, D., and Sanders, G. 1990. Measuring organizational cultures, A qualitative study across twenty cases, Administrative Science Quarterly. 35: 286–316.
- Humphrey, W. 1959. Managing the Software Process, New York, Addison-Wesley.
- Humphrey, W. 1995. A Discipline for Software Engineering, New York, U.S.A., Addison-Wesley.
- Järvinen, J. 1994. On comparing process assessment results: BOOTSTRAP, and CMM software quality management, SQM '94, Edinburgh, U.K. pp. 274–61–94.
- Joynt, P. and Warner, M. 1996. Introduction: Cross-Cultural Perspectives in Managing Across Cultures: Issues and Perspectives, London,U.K., International Thomson Business Press.
- Kitchenham, B. 1996. Software Metrics—Measurement for Process Improvement, NCC, Blackwell.
- Kondo, Y. 1995. Importance of employee motivation in TQM, Fifth World Congress on Total Quality, Feb., New Delhi, India, pp. 46–52.
- Kuvaja, P. 1999. New developments in software process improvement, keynote speech, Software Quality Conf., Southampton, U.K.
- Mohamed Walaa-Eldeen, A. and Siakas, K.V. 1995. Assessing software quality management maturity (SQMM): A new model incorporating technical aswell ascultural factors, Third Int.Conf.on Software Quality Management SQM '95, Seville.
- Oppenheim, A.N. 1996. Questionnaire Design,Interviewing and Attitude Measurement, Printer Publishers Ltd.
- Orlikowski, W.J. and Baroudi, J.J. 1991. Studying information technology in organizations: research approaches and assumptions, Information Systems Res. 2(1): 1–28.
- Oyen, E. 1992. Comparative Methodology,Theory and Practice in International Social Research, London, Sage Publications Ltd.
- Paulk, M.C. Comparing ISO 9001 and Capability maturity model for Software, Software Quality J. 2: 245–256.
- Paulk, M.C., Curtis, B., and Chrissis, M.B. 1993. Capability maturity model, version 1.1, IEEE Software, pp. 19–27.
- Pfleeger, L.F. 1998. Software Engineering,Theory and Practice, New Jersey, U.S.A., Prentice-Hall.
- Rickard, J. 1997. Personal issues in software cost estimation, Fifth Software Quality Conf., Scotland, Dundee.
- Sanders, M. 1998. The SPIRE Handbook, Better, Faster, Cheaper Software, Development in Small Organisations, SPIRE Project, The European Community, ESPIT/ESSI 23873.
- Schein, E. 1983. The role of the founder in creating organizational culture, Organizational Dynamics. 12(1): 13–28.
- Siakas, K.V. 1996. The effect of cultural factors in the implementation of software quality management systems, Fifth Software Quality Conf., Scotland,Dundee.
- Siakas, K.V. 2001. CODES: cultural and organizational dimensions for management, University of North London, A Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
- Siakas, K.V. and Balstrup, B. 2000. A field-study of cultural influences on software process improvement in a global organization, European Software Process Improvement Conf., Copenhagen.
- Siakas, K.V. and Georgiadou, E. 2000. A new topology of national and organizational cultures to facilitate software quality management, The Fifth Int. Conf. on Software Process Improvement—Research into Education and Training, London, U.K.
- Empirical Measurement of the Effects of Cultural Diversity on Software Quality Management
Software Quality Journal
Volume 10, Issue 2 , pp 169-180
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- software quality management
- cultural diversity
- software process improvement
- empirical measurement
- Industry Sectors