Conservation Genetics

, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp 435–440

An evaluation of long-term preservation methods for brown bear (Ursus arctos) faecal DNA samples

  • Melanie A. Murphy
  • Lisette P. Waits
  • Katherine C. Kendall
  • Samuel K. Wasser
  • Jerry A. Higbee
  • Robert Bogden
Article

DOI: 10.1023/A:1020503330767

Cite this article as:
Murphy, M.A., Waits, L.P., Kendall, K.C. et al. Conservation Genetics (2002) 3: 435. doi:10.1023/A:1020503330767

Abstract

Relatively few large-scale faecal DNA studieshave been initiated due to difficulties inamplifying low quality and quantity DNAtemplate. To improve brown bear faecal DNA PCRamplification success rates and to determinepost collection sample longevity, fivepreservation methods were evaluated: 90%ethanol, DETs buffer, silica-dried, oven-driedstored at room temperature, and oven-driedstored at −20 °C. Preservationeffectiveness was evaluated for 50 faecalsamples by PCR amplification of a mitochondrialDNA (mtDNA) locus (∼146 bp) and a nuclear DNA(nDNA) locus (∼200 bp) at time points of oneweek, one month, three months and six months. Preservation method and storage timesignificantly impacted mtDNA and nDNAamplification success rates. For mtDNA, allpreservation methods had ≥ 75% success atone week, but storage time had a significantimpact on the effectiveness of the silicapreservation method. Ethanol preserved sampleshad the highest success rates for both mtDNA(86.5%) and nDNA (84%). Nuclear DNAamplification success rates ranged from 26–88%, and storage time had a significant impacton all methods but ethanol. Preservationmethod and storage time should be importantconsiderations for researchers planningprojects utilizing faecal DNA. We recommendpreservation of faecal samples in 90% ethanolwhen feasible, although when collecting inremote field conditions or for both DNA andhormone assays a dry collection method may beadvantageous.

DNA extractionDNA preservationfaecal DNAnoninvasive genetic samplingPCRUrsus arctos

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Melanie A. Murphy
    • 1
  • Lisette P. Waits
    • 1
  • Katherine C. Kendall
    • 2
  • Samuel K. Wasser
    • 3
  • Jerry A. Higbee
    • 4
  • Robert Bogden
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Fish and Wildlife ResourcesUniversity of IdahoMoscowUSA
  2. 2.USGS Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center, Glacier Field StationWest GlacierUSA
  3. 3.Center for Conservation Biology, Department of ZoologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  4. 4.Amplicon ExpressPullmanUSA