Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation of genetic diversity in fragmented geometric tortoise (Psammobates geometricus) populations

  • Published:
Conservation Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Microsatellite DNA was used to investigatelevels of genetic variability in severelyfragmented populations of the geometrictortoise, Psammobates geometricus, themost endangered tortoise on mainland Africa.Eight microsatellite markers were used toassess genetic variability within and betweenthree naturally occurring populations of P. geometricus. These populations areseparated by the Cape Fold mountain ranges inthe western Cape region of South Africa. Levels of variability were quantified usingallelic diversity, genotypic frequencies andheterozygosity. Evidence for populationsub-structuring was examined using Fstatistics, Rst and δμ2.High levels of variability were found in allthree populations. Low levels of populationdifferentiation were found suggestingsignificant gene flow between the populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baard EHW (1992) Morphometric and stripe pattern differences between geometric tortoise (Psammobates geometricus) populations in the South-Western Cape Province. African Herpetology News, 18, 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baard EHW, Mouton Ple FN (1993a) A hypothesis explaining the enigmatic distribution of the geometric tortoise, Psammombates geometricus, in South Africa. Herpetological Journal, 3, 65–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baard EHW (1993b) Distribution and status of the geometric tortoise, Psammombates geometricus, in South Africa. Biological Conservation, 63, 235–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baard EHW (1995a) A preliminary analysis of the habitat of the geometric tortoise. Psammobates geometricus, South African Journal Wildlife Research, 25(1), 8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baard EHW (1995b) Growth, age at maturity and sexual dimorphism in the geometric tortoise, Psammobates geometricus. Journal Herpetological Association of Africa, 44, 10–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks MA, Eichert W (2000) WHICHRUN (Version 3.2) a computer programme for population assignment of individuals based on multilocus genotype data. Journal of Heredity, 91, 87–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boycott RC, Bourquin O (1988) The South African tortoise book. Johannesburg: Southern Book Publishers (PTY) Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broders HG, Mahoney SP, Montevecchi WA, Davidson WS (1999) Population genetic structure and the effect of founder events on the genetic variability of moose, Alces alces. Molecular Ecology, 8, 1309–1315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruford MW, Wayne RK (1993) Microsatellites and their application to population genetic studies. Current Opinions in Genetics and Development, 3, 939–943.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowling RM, Richardson D (1995) Fynbos – South Africa's Unique Floral Kingdom. Fernwood Press, Cape Town.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel OH, Soulé ME (1981) Conservation and Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankham R, Ralls K (1998) Inbreeding leads to extinction. Nature, 392, 441–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garza JC, Williamson EG (2001) Detection of reduction in population size using data from microsatellite loci. Molecular Ecology, 10, 305–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein DB, Linares AR, Cavalli-Sforza LL, Feldman MW (1995) An evaluation of genetic distances for use with microsatellite loci. Genetics, 139, 463–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman SJ (1997) RstCalc: A collection of computer programmes for calculating estimates of genetic differentiation from microsatellite data and determining their significance. Molecular Ecology, 6, 881–885.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goudet J (1995) FSTAT, version 1.2 a computer programme to calculate Fstatistics. Journal of Heredity, 86, 485–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greig JC, Boycott RC (1977) The geometric tortoise – Psammobates geometricus – Progress Report 1977. In Research Report – Herpetology, 1977, 56–66. Cape Department of Nature and Environmental Conservation, Cape Town.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groombridge B (ed.) (1993) 1994 IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals. IUCN, Gland.

  • Guo SW, Thompson EA (1992) Performing the exact test of Hardy-Weinberg proportion for multiple alleles. Biometrics, 48, 361–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley EHH (2001) Agarst version 2.2. University of Cape Town, South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iverson JB (1992) A Revised Checklist with Distribution Maps of the Turtles of the World. Privately printed, Richmond, Indiana.

  • Juvik JO (1971) The status of Psammobates geometricus in the Western Cape. International. Turtle and Tortoise Society Journal, 5(1), 10–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura M, Crow JF (1964) The number of alleles that can be maintained in a finite population. Genetics, 49, 561–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura M, Ohta T (1978) Stepwise mutation model and distribution of allele frequencies in a finite population. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA, 75, 2868–2872.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann T, Hawley WA, Grebert H, Collins FH (1998) The effective population size of Anopheles gambiae in Kenya: Implications for population structure. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 15(3), 264–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luikart G, Cornuet J (1998) Emperical evaluation of a test for identifying recently bottlenecked populations from allele frequency data. Conservation Biology, 12(1), 228–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundy CJ, Moran P, Rico C, Milner RS, Hewitt GM (1999) Macrogeographical population differentiation in oceanic environments: A case study of European hake (Merluccius merluccius), a commercially important fish. Molecular Ecology, 8, 1889–1898.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell C, Moll E (1992) The influence of agriculture on the decline of West Coast Renosterveld, south-western Cape, South Africa. Journal of Environmental Management, 35, 173–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moritz C (1994) Defining evolutionary significant units for conservation. Trends in Ecolology and Evolution, 9, 373–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei M (1973) Analysis of gene diversity in sub-divided populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 70, 3321–3323.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Ryan C, Harley EH, Bruford MW, Beaumont M, Wayne RK, Cherry MI (1998) Microsatellite analysis of genetic diversity in fragmented South African buffalo populations. Animal Conservation, 1, 85–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pemberton JM, Slate J, Bancroft DR, Barrett JA (1995) Nonamplifying alleles at microsatellite loci: A caution for parentage and population studies. Molecular Ecology, 4, 249–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piry S, Luikart G, Cornuet JM(1999) BOTTLENECK 1.2.02: A programme for detecting recent effective population size reductions from allele frequencies. Available at http://www.ensam.inra.fr/ URLB.

  • Primack RB (1993) Essentials of Conservation Biology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rau R (1971) Cape Reserve for one of the world's rarest tortoises. African Wildlife, 25(3), 96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (version 1.2): Population genetic software for exact tests and Ecumericism. Journal of Hereditary, 3, 248–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice WR (1989) Analysing tables of statistical tests. Evolution, 43, 223–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roff DA, Bentzen P (1989) The statistical analysis of mitochondrial DNA polymorphisms: Chi-squared and the problem of small samples. Molecular Ecology and Evolution, 6, 539–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooney AP, Honeycutt RP, Davis SK, Derr JN (1999) Evaluating a Putative Bottleneck in a Population of Bowhead Whales from Patterns of Microsatellite Diversity and Genetic Disequilibria. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 49(4), 682–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saccheri I, Kuusaari M, Kankare M (1998) Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly population. Nature, 392, 491–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning: A labarotory manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sites JW, Fitzsimmons NN, Jorge Da Silva N, Cantarelli VH (1999) Conservation genetics of the Giant Amazon River Turtle (Podocnemis expansa) – inferences from two classes of molecular markers. Chelonian Conservation and Biology, 3(3), 454–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slatkin M (1995) A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. Genetics, 139, 457–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford DL, Selander RB (1981) BIOSYS-1: A FORTRAN program for the comprehensive analysis of electrophoretic data in population genetics and systematics. Journal of Heredity, 72, 281–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tautz D, Rens M (1984) Simple sequences are ubiquitous repetitive components of eukaryotic genomes. Nucleic acids Research, 12.

  • Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution, 38, 1358–1370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westemeier RL, Brawn JD, Simpson SA, Esker TL, Jansen RW, Walk JW, Kershner EL, Bouzat JL, Paige KN (1998) Tracking the long term decline and recovery of an isolated population. Science, 282, 1695–1698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young Ag, Merriam HG, Warwick SI (1993) The effects of forest fragmentation on genetic variation in Acer saccharum Marsh (sugar maple) populations. Heredity, 71, 227–289.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Cunningham.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cunningham, J., Baard, E., Harley, E. et al. Investigation of genetic diversity in fragmented geometric tortoise (Psammobates geometricus) populations. Conservation Genetics 3, 215–223 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019909515202

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019909515202

Navigation