Evidence and Warrants for Belief in a College Astronomy Course
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Science educators have argued that it is insufficient to be able to recite thetheories of science and not know how knowledge claims in science are justified, what counts as evidence, or how theory and evidence interact. We wonder, however, how much students' understandings of the nature of science vary with content. This paper draws on data collected in a university astronomy course. Data include three interviews and written work from twenty students, as well as written work from the 340 students in the class. This study provides us with evidence on how students' talk and writing about the nature of science differs depending on the particular scientific topic which is under discussion. The relationship between theory and evidence, warrants for belief, and nature of observation are described in various ways in the different disciplines discussed in the course.
- Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R.L. & Lederman, N.G.: 1998, ‘The Nature of Science and Instructional Practice: Making the Unnatural Natural’, Science Education 82, 417-436.
- American Association for the Advancement of Science: 1993, Benchmarks for Scientific Literacy, Oxford University Press, New York.
- Bernstein, R.J.: 1983, Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics and Praxis, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.
- Brickhouse, N.W., Dagher, Z.R., Letts, W.L. & Shipman, H.L.: 2000, ‘The Diversity of Students' Views about Evidence, Theory and the Interface Between Science and Religion in an Astronomy Course’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37(4), 340-362.
- Brickhouse, N.W., Lowery, P.A. & Schultz, K.: 2000, ‘What Kind of a Girl Does Science? The Construction of School Science Identities’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37(5), 441-458.
- Brickhouse, N.W., Stanley, W.B. & Whitson, J.A.: 1993, ‘Practical Reasoning and Science Education: Implications for Theory and Practice’, Science & Education 2, 363-375.
- Carey, S., Evans, R., Honda, M., Jay, E. & Ungar, C. 1989, ‘An Experiment Is When You Try It and See If It Works: A Study of Grade 7 Students' Understanding of the Construction of Scientific Knowledge’, International Journal of Science Education 11(5), 514-529.
- Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R. & Scott, P.: 1996, Young People's Images of Science, Open University Press, Philadelphia.
- Duschl, R.: 1990, Restructuring Science Education: The Importance of Theories and Their Development, Teachers College Press, New York.
- Gallison, P. & Stump, D.J. (eds.): 1996, The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, and Power, Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA.
- Goffman, E.: 1958, Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, Monograph 2, Social Sciences Research Centre, University of Edinburgh.
- Hacking, I.: 1996, ‘The Disunities of the Sciences’, in P. Gallison & D.J. Stump (eds.), The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, and Power, Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA, pp.37-74.
- Kuhn, D., Amsel, E. & O'Loughlin, M.: 1988, The Development of Scientific Thinking Skills, Academic Press, London.
- Mallinson, G.G., Mallinson, J.B., Froschaueu, L., Harris, J.A., Lewis, M.C. & Valentino, C.: 1991, Science Horizons, Silver Burdett & Ginn, Morristown, NJ.
- Matthews, M.R.: 1994, Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science, Routledge, New York.
- Millar, R. & Driver, R.: 1987, ‘Beyond Processes’, Studies in Science Education 14, 33-62.
- National Academy of Sciences: 1998, Teaching About Evolution and the Nature of Science, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
- National Research Council: 1995, National Science Education Standards, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
- Norris, S.P.: 1997, ‘Intellectual Independence for Nonscientists and Other Content-Transcendent Goals of Science Education’, Science Education 81, 239-258.
- Roth, W-M. & Lucas, K.B.: 1997, ‘From “Truth” to “Invented Reality”: A Discourse Analysis of High School Physics Students Talk About Scientific Knowledge’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 34, 145-179.
- Ryder, J., Leach, J. & Driver, R.: 1999, ‘Undergraduate Science Students' Images of Science’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 6(2), 201-220.
- Samarapungavan, A.: 1992, ‘Children's Judgments in Theory Choice Tasks: Scientific Rationality in Childhood’, Cognition 45(1), 1-32.
- Shipman, H.L., Brickhouse, N.W., Dagher, Z.R. & Letts, W.: 2002, ‘Changes in Student Views of Religion and Science in a College Astronomy Course’, Science Education 86, 526-547.
- Stanley, W.B. & Brickhouse, N.W.: 2001, ‘Teaching Sciences: The Multicultural Question Revis-ited’, Science Education 85(1), 35-49.
- Weiner, J.: 1994, The Beak oftheFinch, Vintage, New York.
- Evidence and Warrants for Belief in a College Astronomy Course
Science & Education
Volume 11, Issue 6 , pp 573-588
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Author Affiliations
- 1. University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA. E-mail
- 2. University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA. E-mail
- 3. University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA. E-mail
- 4. Australia. E-mail