Cultural Theory and integrated assessment
- Michael Thompson
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Most scientific work, integrated assessment included, tries to avoid bias. Cultural Theory, however, suggests that bias is unavoidable, and it predicts the various biases that are possible, the social conditions under which each will occur and the essentially complex nature of their interaction. If Cultural Theory is right (and examples from energy modelling and human land use in mountain ecosystems suggest that it is) then it is important that it and integrated assessment come together. The paper begins by explaining how this has, in fact, been happening, and then explores the implications of this for integrated assessment.
Cultural Theory, in completing the fourfold typology of forms of social solidarity that is implicit in the classic markets‐and‐hierarchies distinction, gives us human systems that are complex: non‐linear, indeterministic, far from equilibrium, highly sensitive to initial conditions, and with future states that are unpredictable. Since the same has now been done to the classic ecological distinction between pioneer and climax communities, we find ourselves trying to manage a system, of which we ourselves are part, that is not manageable in the way that simple systems are manageable.
Coming to terms with that new understanding, and putting together the tool‐kit appropriate to policy in a complex world, is the task we face. “Always learning, never getting it right” captures the new understanding: a sentiment that many integrated assessors will find congenial. The new tool‐kit, however, with its emphasis on reflexivity, on scenario planning and on micro and macro each as the cause of the other, presents more of a challenge.
- J. Ausubel, The liberation of the environment, Daedalus 125(3) (1996) 1-17.
- D.J. Brion, The meaning of the city: urban redevelopment and the loss of community, Indiana Law Review 25(3) (1992) 685-740.
- K. Dake and M. Thompson, The meanings of sustainable development: household strategies for managing needs and resources, in: Human Ecology: Crossing Boundaries, eds. S.D. Wright, T. Dietz, R. Borden, G. Young and G. Guagnano, The Society for Human Ecology, Fort Collins, CO (1993).
- M. Douglas, Risk Acceptability According to the Social Sciences, Occasional Reports on Current Topics, No. 11 (Russell Sage Foundation, New York, 1985).
- R. Ellis, Introductory essay, in: Culture Matters, eds. R. Ellis and M. Thompson (West View, New York, 1997).
- G. Grendstad, Classifying cultures, Ph.D. thesis, University of Bergen (1994) (unpublished).
- G. Grendstad and P. Selle, Cultural theory, postmaterialism and environmental attitudes, in: Culture Matters, eds. R. Ellis and M. Thompson (West View, New York, 1997).
- W. Häfele, Energy in a Finite World, Vol. 1. Paths to a Sustainable Future, Vol. 2. A Global Systems Analysis (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA, 1981).
- C.S. Holling, The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems: local surprise and global change, in: Sustainable Development of the Biosphere, eds. W.C. Clark and R.E. Munn (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986) pp. 292-320.
- IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), Climate Change 1992: The Supplementary Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment, eds. J.T. Houghton, B.A. Callander and S.K. Varney (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992).
- M. Janssen, Meeting Targets: Tools to Support Integrated Assessment Modelling of Global Change (CIP-Gegevens Koninklijke Bibliotheek, Den Haag, 1996).
- B. Keepin, A technical appraisal of the IIASA energy scenario, Policy Sciences 17(3) (1984) 199-276. CrossRef
- R.O. Keohane and E. Ostrom, Editorial Introduction to Local Commons and Global Interdependence (Sage, London, 1995) pp. 1-26.
- J.M. Keynes, General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money (Macmillan, London, 1936).
- J. Linnerooth-Bayer and K.B. Fitzgerald, Conflicting views on fair siting processes, Risk, Health, Safety and Environment 7(2) (1996) 119-134.
- J.-F. Lyotard, La Condition Postmoderne: Rapport sur le Savoir (Les Editions de Minuit, Paris, 1979).
- D. MacLean, Risk and consent: philosophical issues for centralised decisions, Risk Analysis 2 (1982) 59-67. CrossRef
- C. Marris, I. Langford and T. O'Riordan, Integrating sociological and psychological approaches to public perceptions of environmental risk. Detailed results from a questionnaire survey, CSERGE Working Paper CEC 96-07, University of East Anglia, UK (1996).
- G.M. Morgan and M. Henrion, Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990).
- M.F. Price and M. Thompson, The complex life: human land uses in mountain ecosystems, Global Ecology and Biogeograph Letters 6 (1997) 77-90. CrossRef
- J. Ravetz, The sin of science: Ignorance of ignorance, Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 15(2) (1993) 157-165.
- S. Rayner, Disagreeing about risk, in: Risk Analysis, Institutions and Public Policy, ed. S. Hadden (Associated Faculty Press, New York, 1984).
- S. Rayner and E.L. Malone, eds., Human Choice and Climate Change, Vol. 1 (Battelle Press, Washington, DC, 1998) (forthcoming).
- M. Thompson and S. Rayner, Societal discourses, in: Rayner et al. .
- M. Schapiro, Judicial selection and the design of clumsy institutions, Southern California Law Review 61 (1988) 1555-1569.
- P. Schwartz, The Art of the Long View (Doubleday Currency, London, 1991).
- M. Schwarz and M. Thompson, Divided We Stand: Redefining Politics, Technology and Social Choice (Harvester Wheatsheaf, London, and University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, 1990).
- M. Thompson, Among the energy tribes: a cultural framework for the analysis and design of energy policy, Policy Sciences 17(3) (1984) 321-339. CrossRef
- M. Thompson, Welsche Gesellschaftsklassen sind potent genug, anderen ihre Zukunft aufzuocktroyieren? Und wie geht das vor sich?, in: Design der Zukunft, ed. L. Burckhardt (Dumont, Köln, 1987) pp. 58-87.
- M. Thompson, The dynamics of cultural theory and their implications for the enterprise culture, in: Understanding the Enterprise Culture, eds. S. Hargreaves Heap and A. Ross (Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 1992) pp. 182-202.
- M. Thompson, Inherent relationality: an anti-dualist approach to institutions, Report 9608, The Norwegian Research Centre in Organisation and Management, Bergen (1996).
- M. Thompson, R. Ellis and A. Wildavsky, Cultural Theory (West View, Boulder, CO, and Oxford, 1990).
- M. Thompson, R. Ellis and A. Wildavsky, Political cultures, in: Encyclopaedia of Government and Politics, eds. M. Hawkesworth and M. Kogan (Routledge, London, 1992) pp. 507-520.
- M. Thompson and P. Tayler, The surprise game: an exploration in constrained relativism, Warwick Papers in Management, No. 1, Institute for Management Research and Development, University of Warwick, Coventry (1986).
- A. Trisoglio, Sustainable development in a complex world, Ph.D. thesis, University College, London (1996) (unpublished).
- A. Trisoglio, R. Swart, M. Thompson, J. Rotmans, H. Dowlatabadi, A. Rahman and B. de Vries, Scenarios of climate change: making the human factor explicit, Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratories (1994) (unpublished report).
- M.B.A. van Asselt and J. Rotmans, Uncertainty in perspective, Global Environmental Change 6(2) (1996) 121-157. CrossRef
- P. Wack, Scenarios: uncharted waters ahead, Harvard Business Review (Sept.–Oct. 1985) 73-89.
- P. Wack, Scenarios: shooting the rapids, Harvard Business Review (Nov.–Dec. 1985) 139-150.
- A. Wildavsky and K. Dake, Theories of risk perception: who fears what and why?, Daedlus 119 (1990) 41-60.
- O. Williamson, Markets and Hierarchies, Analysis and Anti-Trust Implications: A Study In The Economics of Internal Organisation (Free Press, New York, 1979).
- B. Wynne, The institutional context of science, models, and policy: The IIASA Energy Study, Policy Sciences 17(3) (1984) 277-320. CrossRef
- Cultural Theory and integrated assessment
Environmental Modeling & Assessment
Volume 2, Issue 3 , pp 139-150
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- requisite plurality
- social solidarities
- clumsy institutions
- Michael Thompson (1) (2)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. The Musgrave Institute, 52 Northolme Road, Highbury, London, N5 2UX, England
- 2. Norway; and the Norwegian Research Centre in Organisation and Management, The University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway