“I'll Take Gender Differences for $1000!” Domain-Specific Intellectual Success on “Jeopardy”
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
A great deal of laboratory research has demonstrated that women underestimate their intellect and abilities, and we studied whether this tendency manifested itself outside the laboratory by examining the performance of men and women on the television game show “Jeopardy”. Information about the masculinity and femininity of the topic categories for 65 games was collected, and selections, answers,wagering strategies, and earnings were noted for 195 White men and women contestants on the show. Men were more likely than women to appear as contestants, made most of the selections in the game, and won more money. Until the end of the game, men selected and correctly answered a disproportional number of questions from masculine topic categories, which appeared more often during the first round of play. Women chose more feminine and neutral questions than did men, and correctly answered those questions at a proportional rate. Wagering strategies differed late in the game, as men bet a higher percent of their earnings than did women, but only when wagering on masculine topics. Several explanations for differing performance of men and women on “Jeopardy”are offered, including confidence in ability due to self-estimation of intelligence, differential use of evaluative feedback, and the gender role appropriateness of demonstrating intellect.
- Atkin, D. (1991). The evolution of the television series addressing single women, 1966–1990. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 35, 517-523.
- Beloff, H. (1992). Mother, father, and me: Our IQ. The Psychologist, 5, 309-311.
- Berry, D. S. (1990). Vocal attractiveness: Effects on stranger, self, and friend impressions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 14, 141-153.
- Berry, D. S. (1991). Accuracy in social perception: Contributions of facial and vocal information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 298-307.
- Berry, D. S., & Brownlow, S. (1989). Were the physiognomists right? Personality correlates of facial babyishness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 266-279.
- Beyer, S. (1990). Gender differences in the accuracy of self-evaluations of performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 960-970.
- Beyer, S., & Bowden, E. M. (1997). Gender differences in self perceptions: Convergent evidence from three measures of accuracy and bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 157-172.
- Bond, C. F., Berry, D. S., & Omar, A. (1994). The kernel of truth in judgments of deceptiveness. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 15, 523-534.
- Borkenau, P., & Liebler, A. (1993). Convergence of stranger ratings of personality and intelligence with self ratings, partner ratings, and measured intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 546-553.
- Brownlow, S., & Durham, S. (1997). Sex differences in the use of science and technology in children's cartoons. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 6, 103-110.
- Brownlow, S., & Zebrowitz, L. A. (1990). Facial appearance, gender, and credibility in television commercials. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 14, 51-60.
- Byrd, M., & Stacey, B. (1993). Bias in IQ perception. The Psychologist, 6, 16.
- Carli, L. L. (1990). Gender, language, and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 941-951.
- Costrich, N., Feinstein, J., Kidder, L., Marecek, J., & Pascale, L. (1975). When stereotypes hurt: Three studies of penalties for sex-role reversals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 520-530.
- Deaux, K., & Emswiller, T. (1974). Explanations of successful performance on sex-linked tasks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 80-85.
- Fitch, M., Huston, A. C., & Wright, J. C. (1993). From television forms to genre schemata: Children's perceptions of reality television. In G. L. Berry & J. K. Asamen (Eds.), Children and television: Images in a changing sociocultural world. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Fitzgerald, J. M., & Mellor, J. M. (1988). How do people think about intelligence? Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 143-157.
- Flugel, J. C. (1947). An inquiry as to popular views on intelligence and related topics. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 27, 140-152.
- Foshi, M., Lai, L., & Sigerson, K. (1994). Gender and double standards in the assessment of job applicants. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 326-339.
- Furnham, A., & Rawles, R. (1995). Sex differences in the estimation of intelligence. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 741-748.
- Hogan, H. W. (1973). IQ: Self estimates of males and females. Journal of Social Psychology, 106, 137-138.
- Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (1988). Gender differences in verbal ability: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 53-69.
- Lippa, R., & Beauvais, C. (1983). Gender jeopardy: The effects of gender, assessed femininity and masculinity, and false success/failure feedback on performance in an experimental quiz game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 344-353.
- Lips, H. M. (1992). Gender and science-related attitudes as predictors of college students' academic choices. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 40, 62-81.
- Noble, C. E., Baker, B. L., & Jones, T. A. (1972). Age and sex parameters in psychomotor learning. In R. N. Singer (Ed.), Readings in motor learning. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger.
- Pratto, F., Stallworth, L. M., Sidanius, J., & Siers, B. (1997). The gender gap in occupational role attainment: A social dominance approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 37-53.
- Reilly, J., & Mulhern, G. (1995). Gender differences in self-estimated IQ: The need for care in interpreting group data. Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 189-192.
- Roberts, T. (1991). Gender and the influences of evaluation on self-assessment in achievement settings. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 297-308.
- Shipstone, K., & Burt, S. (1973). Twenty-five years on: A replication of Flugel's (1947) work on lay popular views of intelligence and related topics. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 56, 183-187.
- Snyder, M., Tanke, E. D., & Berscheid, E. (1977). Social perception and interpersonal behavior: On the self-fulfilling nature of social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 656-666.
- Sternberg, R. J., Conway, B. E., Ketron, J. L., & Bernstein, M. (1981). People's conception of intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 37-55.
- Swim, J. K. (1994). Perceived versus meta-analytic effect sizes: An assessment of the accuracy of gender stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 21-36.
- Swim, J. K., Borgida, E., Maruyama, G., & Myers, D. G. (1989). Joan McKay versus John McKay: Do gender stereotypes bias evaluations? Psychological Bulletin, 105, 409-429.
- Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250-270. CrossRef
- Wallston, B., & O'Leary, V. (1981). Sex makes a difference: Differential perceptions of women and men. In P. Shaver & C. Hendrick (Eds.), Sex and Gender, 2. (pp. 21-36). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
- Ziegler, D., & White, A. (1990). Women and minorities on network television news: An examination of correspondents and newsmakers. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 34, 215-223.
- “I'll Take Gender Differences for $1000!” Domain-Specific Intellectual Success on “Jeopardy”
Volume 38, Issue 3-4 , pp 269-285
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors