Points of Reference and Individual Differences As Sources of Bias in Ethical Judgments
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
The authors demonstrate that ethical judgments can be biased when previous judgments serve as a point of reference against which a current situation is judged. Scenarios describing ethical or unethical sales practices were used in an experiment to prime subjects who subsequently rated the ethics of an ethically ambiguous target scenario. The target tended to be rated as more ethical by subjects primed with unethical scenarios, and less ethical by subjects primed with ethical scenarios. This "contrast effect," however, is contingent upon individual differences. Specifically, subjects with high (versus low) needs for cognition are more likely to process and use the information presented in the priming scenarios as a point of reference against which to judge the target situation, and hence more prone to the contrastive bias. Implications for avoiding unintentional moral relativism in business decision-making are discussed.
- Bettman, J. R. and M. Sujan: 1987, ‘Effect of Framing on Evalutaion of Comparable and Noncomparable Alternatives by Experts and Novice Consumers’, Journal of Consumer Research 14, 141–154.
- Cacioppo, J. T. and R. E. Petty: 1982, ‘The Need for Cognition’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42, 116–131.
- Cacioppo, J. T., R. E. Petty and C. F. Kao: 1984, ‘The Efficient Assessment of the Need for Cognition’, Journal of Personality Assessment 48, 306–307.
- Dabholkar, P. A. and J. J. Kellaris: 1992, ‘Toward Understanding Marketing Students' Ethical Judgment of Controversial Personal Selling Practices’, Journal of Business Research 24( June), 313–329.
- Dubinsky, A. J., E. N. Berkowitz and W. Budelius: 1980, ‘Ethical Problems of Field Sales Personnel’, MSU Business Topics 28(Summer), 11–16.
- Dubinsky, A. J., M. A. Jolson, R. E. Michaels, M. Kotabe and Ch. U. Lim: 1992, ‘Ethical Percpetion of Field Sales Personnel: An Empirical Assessment’, Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management 12(Fall), 9–21.
- Ferrell, O. C. and L. G. Gresham: 1985, ‘A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing’, Journal of Marketing 49(Summer), 87–96.
- Fischoff, B.: 1983, ‘Predicting Frames’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 9, 103–116.
- Helson, H.: 1964, Adaptation-Level Theory(Harper & Row, New York).
- Herr, P. M., S. J. Sherman and R. H. Fazio: 1982, ‘On the Consequences of Priming: Assimilation and Contrast Effects’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 19, 323–340.
- Higgins, E. T. and L. Lurie: 1983, ‘Context, Categorization, and Recall: The “Change of Standard” Effect’, Cognition Psychology 15, 525–547.
- Higgins, E. T. and C. Stangor: 1988, ‘A “Change of Standard” Perspective on the Relations Among Context, Judgment, and Memory’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54, 181–192.
- Hunt, S. D. and A. Z. Vasquez-Parraga: 1993, ‘Organizational Consequences, Marketing Ethics and Salesforce Supervision’, Journal of Marketing Research 30(February), 78–90.
- Hunt, S. D. and S. J. Vitell: 1986, ‘A General Theory of Marketing Ethics’, Journal of Macromarketing 6(Spring), 5–16.
- Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky: 1979, ‘Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk’, Econometrica 47, 263–291.
- Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky: 1984, ‘Choices, Values, and Frames’, American Psychologist 39, 341–350.
- Kellaris, J. J., B. A. Boyle and R. F. Dahlstrom: 1994, ‘On the Framing and Situational Ethics’, Marketing Letters 5(1), 69–75.
- Keppel, G.: 1982, Design and Analysis-A Researcher's Handbook2/E (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
- Levin, I. P. and G. J. Gaeth: 1988, ‘How Consumers are Affected by the Framing of Attribute Information Before and After Consuming the Product’, Journal of Consumer Research 15, 374–378.
- Manis, M. and G. Armstrong: 1971, ‘Contrast Effects in Verbal Output’, Journal of Experimental Cognitive Psychology 7, 381–388.
- McNeil, B. J. S. Pauker, H. Sox Jr. and A. Tversky: 1982, ‘On the Elicitation of Preferences for Alternative Therapies’, New England Journal of Medicine 306, 1259–1262.
- Parducci, A.: 1968, ‘The Relativism of Absolute Judgments’, Scientific American 219, 84–90.
- Puto, C. P.: 1987, ‘The Framing of Buying Decisions’, Journal of Consumer Research 14(December), 301–315.
- Qualls, W. J. and C. P. Puto: 1989, ‘Organizational Climate and Decision Framing: An Integrated Approach to Analyzing Industrial Buying Decisions’, Journal of Marketing Research 26(May), 179–192.
- Schoemaker, P.: 1982, ‘The Expected Utility Model: Its Variants, Purposes, Evidenced and Limitations’, Journal of Economic Literature 20, 529–563.
- Sherman, S. J., K. Ahlm and L. Berman: 1978, ‘Contrast Effects and Their Relationship to Subsquent Behavior’, Journal of Experimental Psychology 14, 340–350.
- Thaler, R.: 1985, ‘Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice’, Marketing Science 4(Summer), 199–214.
- Thaler, R. and E. J. Johnson: 1990, ‘Gambling with the House Money and Trying to Break Even: The Effects of Prior Outcomes on Risky Choice’, Management Science 36, 643–660.
- Tsalikis, J. and D. J. Fritsche: 1989, ‘Business Ethics: A Literature Review with a Focus on Marketing Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 8, 695–743.
- Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman: 1981, ‘The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice’, Science 185, 1124–1131.
- von Neumann, J. and O. Morgenstern: 1944, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior(Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).
- Wotruba, T. R.: 1990, ‘A Comprhensive Framework for the Analysis of Ethical Behavior, with a Focus on Sales Organizations’, Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management 10(Spring), 29–42.
- Points of Reference and Individual Differences As Sources of Bias in Ethical Judgments
Journal of Business Ethics
Volume 17, Issue 5 , pp 517-525
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors