Skip to main content
Log in

Institutionalized Resistance to Organizational Change: Denial, Inaction and Repression

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An extensive theoretical and research literature on organizational change and its implementation has been accumulating over the past fifty years. It is customary in this literature to find resistance to change mentioned as an inevitable consequence of organizational change initiatives. Yet there has been little discussion of the nature and forms of resistance that is institutionalized in organizational structure and processes. Furthermore, organization development perspectives on organizational change address management-initiated change, but not change proposed by advocates for the powerless and disadvantaged. Focussing on institutionalized resistance from the standpoint of the advocate of fundamental change, this discussion proposes a typology consisting of a sequence of forms of active resistance to change, from denial through inaction to repression. The typology is illustrated by referring to responses of organizational decision makers to the efforts of employment equity change agents to address issues of systemic discrimination in the work place. The purpose of the typology is to assist change advocates, such as equality seekers, to name, analyze and think strategically about the institutionalized resistance they encounter, and about effective responses to the resistance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abella, R. S.: 1984, Report of the Royal Commission on Equality in Employment (Minister of Supply and Services Canada, Ottawa).

    Google Scholar 

  • Adamson, N., L. Briskin and M. McPhail: 1988, Feminist Organizing for Change (Oxford University Press, Toronto).

    Google Scholar 

  • Agócs, C., C. Burr and F. Somerset: 1992, Employment Equity Cooperative Strategies for Organizational Change (Prentice Hall, Scarborough).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alderfer, C. P., R. C. Tucker, D. R. Morgan and F. Drasgow: 1983, ‘Black and White Cognitions of Changing Race Relations in Management’, Journal of Occupational Behavior 4, 105–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, R., K. Lutterman et al.: 1979 Discrimination in Organizations (San Francisco: Jossey Bass).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baritz, L.: 1960, The Servants of Power (Wesleyan University Press, Middletown, Ct.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barzelay, M.: 1992, Breaking Through Bureaucracy (University of California Press, Berkeley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, M. and E. Walton: 1990, ‘Developing the Competitive Organization: Interventions and Strategies’, American Psychologist 45(2), 154–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. and T. Luckmann: 1966, The Social Construction of Reality (Garden City, Anchor).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bocialetti, G.: 1987, ‘Quality of Work Life: Some Unintended Effects on the Seniority Tradition of an Industrial Union’, Group and Organization Studies 12, 386–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braddock, J. H. II and J. McPartland: 1987, ‘How Minorities Continue to be Excluded from Equal Employment Opportunities: Research on Labor Market and Institutional Barriers’, Journal of Social Issues 43(1), 5–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, W. W.: 1987, Organization Development: A Normative View (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.).

    Google Scholar 

  • The Chilly Editorial Collective: 1995, Breaking Anonymity: The Chilly Climate for Women Faculty (Wilfred Laurier University Press, Waterloo, Ontario).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coch, L. and J. R. P. French, Jr.: 1948, ‘Overcoming Resistance to Change’, Human Relations 1(Aug) 512–532.

  • Collinson, D., D. Knights and M. Collinson: 1990, Managing to Discriminate (Routledge, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, T. Jr. and S. Nkomo: 1990, ‘Invisible Men and Women: A Status Report on Race as Variable in Organization Behavior Research’, Journal of Organizational Behavior 11, 419–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn, C.: 1991, In the Way of Women: Men's Resistance to Sex Equality in Organizations (ILR Press, Ithaca).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, F. et al.: 1989, ‘The Denial of Personal Disadvantage Among You, Me, and All the Other Ostriches’, in M. Crawford and M. Gentry (eds.), Gender and Thoughts: Psychological Perspectives, pp. 78–99.

  • Essex, C., letter to the editor, Western News, March 23, 1995, 14.

  • Feldthusen, B.: 1990, ‘The Gender Wars: ‘Where the Boys Are”, Canadian Journal of Women and the Law 4(1), 66–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrest, A.: 1993, ‘Women and Industrial Relations Theory: No Room in the Discourse’, Relations industrielles 48(3), 409–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, W. A.: 1968, Power and Discontent (Dorsey, Homewood, Ill.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E.: 1963, Stigma (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S.: 1991, Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? (Cornell University Press, Ithaca).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooks, B.: 1989, Talking Back: Thinking Feminist, Thinking Black (South End Press, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra, H.: 1993, ‘Personal Networks of Women and Minorities in Management: A Conceptual Framework’, Academy of Management Review 18(1), 56–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M.: 1977, Men and Women of the Corporation (Basic, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, L.: 1976, A Social Scientist in Industry (Gower Press, Epping, Essex).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kossek, E. E. and S. Zonia: 1993, ‘Assessing Diversity Climate: A Field Study of Reactions to Employer Efforts to Promote Diversity’, Journal of Organizational Behavior 14, 61–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotter, J. and L. Schlesinger: 1979, ‘Choosing Strategies for Change’, Harvard Business Review 57 (March/April), 106–114.

  • Lewin, K.: 1951, Field Theory in Social Science (Harper and Row, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K.: 1947, ‘Frontiers in Group Dynamics’, Human Relations 1(1), 5–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madhava Rau, L.: 1996, ‘Frustration Writ Large: The Politics of Racism at Western’, Women's Studies International Forum 19(3), 327–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manz, C., D. Keating and A. Donnelon: 1990, ‘Preparing for an Organizational Change to Employee Self-management: The Managerial Transition’, Organizational Dynamics 19(2), 15–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S.: 1993, ‘Proving Gender Bias in the Law and the Legal System’, in Joan Brockman and Dorothy Chunn (eds.), Investigating Gender Bias: Law, Courts and the Legal Profession (Thompson, Toronto) pp. 19–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, A. and S. Murgatroyd: 1991, Organizational Rules (Open University Press, Buckingham).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, A. and T. Simmons: 1995, Reading Organization Theory: A Critical Approach (Garamond Press, Toronto).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirvis, P. H. and D. N. Berg (eds.): 1977, Failures in Organization Development and Change (Wiley-Interscience, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, A.: 1985, The Awakening Giant: Continuity and Change in ICL (Basil Blackwell, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. and J. Martin: 1987, ‘Shaping the Organizational Context for Black American Inclusion’, Journal of Social Issues 43(1), 41–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J.: 1981, Power in Organizations (Pitman, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitz, J. and R. Breton: 1994, The Illusion of Difference: Realities of Ethnicity in Canada and the United States (C. D. Howe Institute, Toronto).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, L. A. and B. Oshry: 1984, ‘Quality of Work Life and the Supervisor: Muddle in the Middle’, Organizational Dynamics 13, 4–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D.: 1987, The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology (University of Toronto Press, Toronto).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, D.: 1990, You Just Don't Understand: Women and Men in Conversation (Ballentine, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thacker, R. and S. Gohmann: 1993 Fall, ‘Male/Female Differences in Perceptions and Effects of Hostile Environment Sexual Harassment: ‘Reasonable’ Assumptions?’, Public Personnel Management 22(3), 461–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tichy, N.: 1983, Managing Strategic Change: Technical, Political and Cultural Dynamics (John Wiley, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • The University of Western Ontario: August 1995, ‘Report of the Faculty Pay Equity Committee’.

  • Walton, R. E.: 1977, ‘Work Innovations at Topeka: After Six Years’, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 13, 422–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weedon, C.: 1987, Feminist Practice and Poststructuralist Theory (Basil Blackwell, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, D.: 1984, ‘Bureaucratic Opposition: Whistle-blowing and Other Tactics’, in Ron Westrum and Khalil Samaha (eds.) Complex Organizations: Growth, Struggle, and Change (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs), pp. 254–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieneke, C.: 1991, ‘Equal Employment Opportunity in Australia: A Practitioner's Perspective’, Equal Opportunities International 10(1), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Agócs, C. Institutionalized Resistance to Organizational Change: Denial, Inaction and Repression. Journal of Business Ethics 16, 917–931 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017939404578

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017939404578

Navigation