Translation, cultural adaptation, and initial reliability and multitrait testing of the Kidney Disease Quality of Life instrument for use in Japan
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Background: The Kidney Disease Quality of Life instrument (KDQOL™) consists of 79 items: 36 asking about health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in general (the Medical Outcomes Study SF-36) and 43 asking about QOL as it is affected by kidney disease and by dialysis. Aim: Translation, cultural adaptation and initial reliability and multitrait testing of the KDQOL™ for use in Japan. Methods: Translation and cultural adaptation began with two translations into Japanese, two backtranslations into English, and discussions among the translators, the project coordinators in Japan, and the developers of the original (US-English) version. Focus-group discussions and field testing were followed by analyses of test–retest reliability, internal consistency, and convergent and discriminant construct validity. Results: All eight of the SF-36 scales met the criterion for internal consistency (Cronbach's α ranged from 0.73 to 0.92) and were reproducible (intraclass correlations between test and retest scores ranged from 0.60 to 0.82). Of the 10 kidney-disease-targeted scales, only two had α coefficients of less than 0.70: ‘sleep’ (0.61) and ‘quality of social interaction’ (0.35). One item on the ‘quality of social interaction’ scale had a very weak correlation with the remainder of that scale (r = 0.10). Eliminating that item from scoring increased the α coefficient of the scale from 0.35 to 0.64. All three items on the ‘quality of social interaction’ scale had very strong correlations with other scales. Conclusions: First, in Japanese patients receiving dialysis the SF-36 scales are internally consistent and their scores are reproducible. Second, with the possible exception of the ‘quality of social interaction’ scale, the Japanese version of the KDQOL™,can provide psychometrically sound kidney-disease-targeted data on quality of life in such patients.
- Hays RD, Kallich JD, Mapes DL, Coons SJ, Carter WB. Development of the Kidney Disease Quality of Life (KDQOL™) instrument. Qual Life Res 1994; 3(5): 329–338.
- Ware Jr JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36–item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30(6): 473–483.
- Khan IH, Garratt AM, Kumar A, et al. Patients' perception of health on renal replacement therapy: Evaluation using a new instrument. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1995; 10(5): 684–689.
- Merkus MP, Jager KJ, Dekker FW, Boeschoten EW, Stevens P, Krediet RT. Quality of life in patients on chronic dialysis: Self-assessment 3 months after the start of treatment. The Necosad Study Group. Am J Kidney Dis 1997; 29(4): 584–592.
- Morton AR, Meers C, Singer MA, et al. Quantity of dialysis: Quality of life — what is the relationship? ASAIO J 1996; 42(5): M713–M717.
- Kurtin PS, Davies AR, Meyer KB, DeGiacomo JM, Kantz ME. Patient-based health status measures in outpatient dialysis. Early experiences in developing an outcomes assessment program. Med Care 1992; 30(Suppl 5): MS136–MS149.
- Meyer KB, Espindle DM, DeGiacomo JM, Jenuleson CS, Kurtin PS, Davies AR. Monitoring dialysis patients' health status. Am J Kidney Dis 1994; 24(2): 267–279.
- Aaronson NK, Acquadro C, Alonso J, et al. International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. Qual Life Res 1992; 1(5): 349–351.
- Fukuhara S, Bito S, Green J, Hsiao A, Kurokawa K. Translation, adaptation, and validation of the SF-36 Health Survey for use in Japan. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51(11): 1037–1044.
- Bito S, Fukuhara S. Validation of interviewer administration of the short form 36 health survey, and comparisons of health-related quality of life between community-dwelling and institutionalized elderly people. Jpn J Geriat 1998; 35: 458–463.
- Hays RD, Kallich JD, Mapes DL, et al. Kidney Disease Quality of Life Short Form (KDQOL-SF™), Version 1.3: A Manual for Use and Scoring. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, P-7994, 1997.
- Bullinger M, Alonso J, Apolone G, et al. Translating health status questionnaires and evaluating their quality: The IQOLA project approach. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51(11): 913–923.
- Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951; 16: 297–334.
- Nunnally J. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
- Harris-Kojetin LD, Fowler FJ, Brown JA, Schnaier JA, Sweeny SF. The use of cognitive testing to develop and evaluate CAHPS™ 1.0 core survey items. Med Care 1999; 37(3): MS10–MS21.
- Hays RD, Amin N, Fukuhara S, et al. Kidney Disease Quality of Life Short Form (KDQOL-SF™), Version 1.2: A Manual for Use and Scoring (Japanese Questionnaire, Japan). Santa Monica, CA: RAND, P-7928/5, 1997.
- Translation, cultural adaptation, and initial reliability and multitrait testing of the Kidney Disease Quality of Life instrument for use in Japan
Quality of Life Research
Volume 10, Issue 1 , pp 93-100
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Kidney disease
- Quality of life
- Renal disease
- Renal replacement therapy
- Industry Sectors