Reasoning about Responsibilities: Mining Company Managers on What Stakeholders are Owed
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Stakeholder theories propose that managers are responsible not only for maximizing shareholder value, but also for taking into account the well being of other parties affected by corporate decisions. While the language of stakeholder theory has been taken up in industries like mining, controversy remains. Disagreements arise not only about the apportionment of costs and benefits among stakeholders, but about who counts as a stakeholder and about how "costs" and "benefits" are to be conceived. This paper investigates these questions empirically by examining how managers in one mining company talk about corporate responsibilities and by analysing the explicit and implicit values systems and moral logics which inform this talk. The investigations discovered that while some claims by stakeholder groups were readily accommodated by managers, others were not. Analysis of the value frameworks employed by the mangers confirms the views of leading stakeholder theorists that stakeholder theory is grounded in the realities of management practice and behaviour.
- Barrett, M.: 1996, ‘Good Citizenship is Good Business', Policy Options (December), 3–6.
- Barton, H.: 1996, ‘The Isle of Harris Superquarry: Concepts of the Environment and Sustainability', Environmental Values 5, 97–122.
- Bullis, C.: 1991, ‘Organizational values and Control: The Case of Professionals in the U.S. Forest Service', in C. Conra (ed.), The Ethical Nexus: Values and Decision Making in Organizations (Ablex, Norwood, NJ).
- Bullis, C. and J. Kennedy: 1991, ‘Value Conflicts and Policy Interpretations: Changes in the Case of Fisheries and Wildlife Managers in Multiple Use Agencies', Policy Studies Journal 19, 542–552.
- Clarkson, M.: 1996, ‘Redefining the Corporation: A Stakeholder Perspective', Policy Options (December), 6–10.
- Clarkson, M. (ed.): 1998, The Corporation and Its Stakeholders: Classic and Contemporary Readings (University of Toronto Press, Toronto).
- Cragg. W.: 1996, ‘Shareholders, Stakeholders and the Modern Corporation', Policy Options (December), 15–20.
- Cragg. W.: 1998, ‘Sustainable Development and Mining: Opportunity or Threat to the Industry?', in J. Skeaff (ed.), Metals and the Environment (Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum, Montreal).
- Cragg, W., D. Pearson and J. Cooney: 1996, ‘Ethics, Surface Mining and the Environment', Resource Policy 17(10).
- Donaldson, T. and L. E. Preston: 1995, ‘Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implications', Academy of Management Review 20(1), 65–91.
- Dungan, P.: 1997, Rock Solid: The Impact of the Mining and Primary Metals Industries on the Canadian Economy (Institute for Policy Analysis, University of Toronto, Toronto).
- Gale, F. and M. M'Gonigle: 1996, ‘Corporate Responsibility: Yet Another Oxymoron?', Policy Options (December), 28–32.
- Freudenburg, W. and S. K. Pastor: 1992, ‘NIMBYs and LULUs: Stalking the Syndromes', Journal of Social Issues 48(4), 39–61.
- Liedka, J.: 1991, ‘Organizational Value Contention and Managerial Mindsets', Journal of Business Ethics 10, 543–557.
- Low, N. and B. Gleeson: 1998, ‘Situating Justice in the Environment: The Case of BHP at the Ok Tedi Copper Mine', Antipode 30, 210–226.
- Maier, M. and J. Messerschmidt: 1998, ‘Commonalities, Conflicts and Contradictions in Organizational Masculinities: Exploring the Gendered Genesis of the Challenger Disaster', Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 35, 325–344.
- Morrill, C.: 1998, ‘Decoding the Language of Etzioni's Moral Dimension in Complex Organizations', in D. Sciulli (ed.), Macro Socio-Economics: From Theory to Activism (M.E. Sharpe, Armonk NY).
- Pearce, F.: 1996, ‘Overview on Regulatory Reform', in Michael Mehta (ed.), Regulatory Efficiency and the Role of Risk Assessment (Queen's University School of Policy Studies, Kingston, ON).
- Scott, M. and S. Lyman: 1968, ‘Accounts', American Sociological Review 33, 46–62.
- Shapira, Z. and T. Griffith: 1990, ‘Comparing the Work Values of Engineers with Managers, Production, and Clerical Workers: A Multivariate Analysis', Journal of Organizational Behavior 11, 281–292.
- Thain, D.: 1996, ‘Stakeholder Capitalism: Breakthrough or Boondoggle?', Policy Options (December), 23–28.
- Young, A.: 1997. 'Public Interest Perspectives on Canadian Environmental Mining Issues: A discussion paper presented to the International Development Research Council's Working Group on Ecosystem Health and Mining in Latin America', Caracas, Venezuela, July, Friends of the Earth Canada. <<http://www.emcbc.miningwatch. org./emcbc/library/ public_interest.html>>
- Reasoning about Responsibilities: Mining Company Managers on What Stakeholders are Owed
Journal of Business Ethics
Volume 39, Issue 3 , pp 319-335
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- corporate social responsibility
- mining ethics
- stakeholder theory
- Industry Sectors