Conservation of biodiversity in the Arabuko Sokoke Forest, Kenya
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Using an economic approach to provide a rationale for rainforestconservation has been a popular exercise in recent years. This paper uses suchan approach to assess the net value of the Arabuko Sokoke Forest in Kenya. Theeconomic benefits associated with the forest derived by local and globalpopulations are estimated by combining evidence from existing studies and theresults of a contingent valuation study carried out by the authors. Thesebenefits are set against the cost of preserving the forest to the Kenyan ForestDepartment. Even when the opportunity cost of the forest land is omitted fromthe costs of forest preservation, and when the revenues generated from theGlobal Environment Facility (GEF) funded project are included, the costs offorest conservation outweigh the benefits. It is only when non-use andexistencevalues are included (which are not realised by the Kenyan population) that theforest benefits exceed the costs. The paper concludes by arguing that, althoughsome projects within the Arabuko Sokoke Forest have been successful incapturingsome of the economic value associated with the forest, more needs to be done todesign additional capture mechanisms so that a greater proportion of the globalbenefit of the forest can be realised by local populations and localgovernments.
Abelson P. 1996. Project Appraisal and Valuation of the Environment. General Principles and Six Case-Studies in Developing Countries. Macmillan Press Ltd, Basingstoke, UK.
Alfarez-Farizo B., Hanley N., Wright R.E. and Macmillan D.C. 1999. Estimating the benefits of agri-environment policy — econometric issues in open-ended contingent valuation studies. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 42: 23–43.
Arabuko Sokoke Forest Annual Report (1999) Kenyan Forest Department, Nairobi, Kenya.
Arrow K., Solow R., Portney P.R., Leamer E.E., Radner R. and Schuman H. 1993. Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Federal Register 58: 4601–4614.
AyiembaW.O. 1998. Biodiversity Utilisation by the Local Communities. Impact of Butterfly Farming on Wild Population of Butterfly to Forest Conservation. National Museums of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.
Bann C. 2000. A Contingent Valuation of the Mangroves of Benut. Paper presented at the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Conference, Crete. Johor State, Malaysia (unpublished).
Boyle K.J., Johnson F.R., McCollum D.W., Desvouges W.H., Dunford R.W. and Hudson S.P. 1996. Valuing public goods: discrete versus continuous valuation responses. Land Economics 72: 381–396.
Carson R. 1994. A Bibliography of Contingent Valuation Studies and Papers. University of California, San Diego, California, pp. 1–104.
Dixon J.A. and Sherman P.B. 1991. Economics of Protected Areas. A New Look at Benefits and Costs. Earthscan Publications, London.
Edwards-Jones G. and KenyonW. 1998. What level of information enables the public to act like experts when evaluating ecological goods. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 41: 463–475.
Emerton L. 1994. Summary of the Current Value Use of Arabuko Sokoke. Forest Department, Nairobi, Kenya.
Fitz-Gibbon C.D., Mogaka H. and Fanshawe J.H. 1995. Subsistence hunting in Arabuko Sokoke Forest and its effect on mammal population. Conservation Biology 9: 1116–1126.
Hanley N. and Ruffell R.J. 1993. The contingent valuation of forest characteristics: two experiments. Journal of Agricultural Economics 44: 217–229.
International Institute of Environment and Development 1997. Valuing the Hidden Harvest: Methodological Approaches for Local-level Economic Analysis of Wild Resources. IIED, London.
Kamuaro O. 1998. State and community conflicts in natural resource management in Kenya. In: Veit P. (ed.), Africa's Valuable Assets. A Reader in Natural Resource Management. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.
Kramer R.A. and Mercer D.E. 1997. Valuing a global environmental good: US residents' willingness to pay to protect tropical rain-forest. Land Economics 73: 196–210.
Kingdon J. 1997. The Kingdon Field Guide to African Mammals. Academic Press, San Diego, California.
KIFCON 1991. Arabuko Sokoke Forest Ornithological Survey. Forest Department, Nairobi, Kenya.
KIFCON 1992. Arabuko Sokoke Forest Vegetation Survey. Forest Department, Nairobi, Kenya.
KIFCON 1993. Arabuko Sokoke Forest Mammal Survey. Forest Department, Nairobi, Kenya.
KIFCON 1995. Arabuko Sokoke Forest and Mida Creek, The Official Guide. Forest Department, Nairobi, Kenya.
Mitchell R.C. and Carson R.T. 1989. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
Negussie G. 1997. Use of traditional values in search for conservation goals: the Kaya forests of the Kenyan coast. In: Doolan S. (ed.), African Rainforest and the Conservation of Biodiversity. Proceedings of the Limbe Conference, 17–24 January 1997, Limbe Botanic Garden, Cameroon. Earthwatch Europe, Oxford.
Norton-Griffith M. 1995. The opportunity cost of biodiversity conservation in Kenya. Ecological Economics 12: 125–139.
Pearce D.W. 1991. An economic approach to saving the tropical forests. In: Helm D. (ed.), Economic Policy Towards the Environment. Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 239–262.
Pearce D.W. and Moran D. 1994. The Economic Value of Biodiversity. Earthscan, London.
Pearce D., Georgiou W.S. and Moran D. 1994. Economic Values and the Environment in Developing Countries. A Report to the United Nations Environmental Programme. UNEP, Nairobi, Kenya.
Ready R., Buzby J.C. and Hu D. 1996. Difference between continuous and discrete contingent valuation estimates. Land Economics 72: 397–411.
Republic of Kenya 1968. Sessional Paper No. 1 of 1968, A Forest Policy for Kenya. Government Printer, Nairobi, Kenya.
Republic of Kenya 1997. National Development Plan 1997–2001. Government Printer, Nairobi, Kenya.
Wass P. 1995. Kenya Indigenous Forests, Status, Management and Conservation. The World Conservation Union, Gland, Switzerland.
- Conservation of biodiversity in the Arabuko Sokoke Forest, Kenya
Biodiversity & Conservation
Volume 11, Issue 8 , pp 1437-1450
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Contingent valuation
- Global benefits
- Industry Sectors