The diffusion of environmental management standards in Europe and in the United States: An institutional perspective
- Magali A. Delmas
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
ISO 14001, released in 1996, provides the basic framework for the establishment of an Environmental Management System (EMS) that can be audited and certified. ISO is not only an acronym for the International Organization for Standardization, but is also a term that refers to its Greek meaning: ‘equal.’ The main rationale for the creation of ISO 14001 was that its worldwide acceptance should facilitate international trade by harmonizing otherwise diffuse environmental management standards and by providing an internationally accepted blueprint for sustainable development, pollution prevention, and compliance assurance.
However, the implementation of ISO 14001 varies significantly across the globe. A significant number of firms have adopted ISO 14001 in Western Europe and Asia. In December 1999, 52% of the 14,106 ISO 14001 certified facilities were located in Western Europe and 36% in Asia. On the contrary, very few American companies have adopted this voluntary standard. U.S. certified facilities accounted for only 4.5% of the total of ISO 14001 certified facilities in the world in December 1999.
The U.S. institutional environment seems acting as a deterrent to ISO 14000 adoption as U.S. companies are fearful of the certification process which lays their performance open to public scrutiny. The opposite is true in Europe, where governments have encouraged the adoption of environmental management standards by setting up a trusted certification system and providing technical assistance to potential adopters.
This paper offers a conceptual framework to analyze this variation in adoption rates. It is proposed that the regulatory, normative and cognitive aspects of a country's institutional environment greatly impact the costs and potential benefits of ISO 14001 adoption and therefore explain the differences in adoption across countries. The analysis is supported by data collected from a phone questionnaire to 140 firms in Europe and a questionnaire mailed to 152 firms in the U.S.
- Adams, R. (1999). 'SO 14001: A key ingredient of competitive edge,' Environmental Law and Management 11 (13): 103–104.
- Allenby, B. (1999). 'Integrating environment and technology: Design for environment,' in M.V. Russo, Environmental Management. NewYork: Houghton Mifflin Company, pp. 245–255.
- Arias, M. E. and M. F. Guillen (1998). 'The transfer of organizational management techniques,' in J. L. Alvarez, ed., The Diffusion and Consumption of Business Knowledge. London: Macmillan.
- Ashford, N. A. (1994). 'In innovation-based strategy for the environment,' The Industrial Transformation Paradigm275–314.
- Bansal, P. (1999). Taking stock of ISO 14001 certifications. Final Report, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC.
- Bergara, M. E. and W. J. Henisz et al. (1998). 'Political institutional and electric utility investment: A cross-nation analysis,' CaliforniaManagement Review 40 (2): 18–35.
- Casper, S. and B. Hancke (1999). 'Global quality norms within national production regimes: ISO 9000 standards in the French and German car industries,' Organizational Studies 20 (6): 961–985.
- Cole, R. E. (1989). Strategies for Learning: Small-Group Activities in American, Japanese, and Swedish Industry. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Corbett, C. J. and D. A. Kirsch (2001). 'International diffusion of ISO 14001 certification,' Production and Operations Management 10 (3): 327–352.
- Delmas, M. and B. Heiman (2001). 'Government credible commitment in the French and American nuclear industry,' Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 20 (3): 433–456.
- DiMaggio, P. and W. Powell (1983). 'The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields,' American Sociology Review 48: 147–160.
- DiMaggio, P. and W. Powell, eds. (1991). The New Institutionalism in Organization Analysis. The University of Chicago Press.
- Dyson, K. (1992). 'Theories of regulation and the case of Germany: A model of regulatory change,' in K. Dyson, The Politics of German Regulation. Aldershot, Brookfield U.S.A., Hong Kong, Singapore, Sydney, Dartmouth: 1–28.
- Fielding, S. (1998). 'ISO 14001 delivers effective environmental management and profits,' Professional Safety 43 (7): 27.
- Gilbert, M. (1994). 'BS 7750 and the eco-management and audit regulation, 'Eco-Management and Auditing 1(2): 6–10.
- Glover Ritzert, C. (2000). 'Decision points in ISO 14001, 'Environmental Quality Management (Spring): 65-74.
- Gooderham, P. N., O. Nordhaug and K. Ringdal (1999). 'Institutional and rational determinants of organizational practices: Human resource management in European firms,' Administrative Science Quarterly 44 (3): 507–531.
- Guler, I.}, M. F. Guillen and J. M. MacPherson (2000). 'Global competition, institutions, and the difiusion of organizational practices: The international spread of the ISO 9000 quality standard,' Administrative Science Quarterly. Forthcoming.
- Illenda, H. and T. Calhoun (1997). 'ISO 14000 audits and legal responsibility,' Environmental Technology 7: 38–40.
- Hoffman, A. and M. Ventresca (1999). 'The institutional framing of policy debates,' American Behavioral Scientist 42 (8): 1368–1392.
- Kelley, M. R. and A. Arora (1996). 'The role of institution-building in U.S. industrial modernization programs,' Research Policy 25: 265–279.
- Klaver, J. and J. Jonker (1998). 'The signi?cance of recent EMS standards as an impetus for improvement,' Eco-Management and Auditing 5 (1): 1–5.
- Kostova, T. (1999). 'Transnational transfer of strategico rganizational practices: A contextual perspective,' Academy ofManagement Review 24 (2): 308–324.
- Lally, A. (1998). 'ISO 14000 and environmental cost accounting: The gateway to the global market,' Law and Policy in International Business 29 (4): 501–538.
- Levy, B. and P. Spiller (1994). 'The institutional foundations of regulatory commitment: A comparative analysis of telecommunications regulation,' Journal of Law Economics and Organization 10(2): 201–246.
- McKiel, M. (1998). 'Implications for U.S. environmental programs,' OECD, Paris. ENV/EPOC/ PPC(98)6/FINAL.
- Mostek, M. (1998). 'Limited privilege and immunity for self-evaluative environmental audits,'Creighton Law Review: 545.
- North, D. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- OECD (1998). 'That do standards for environmental management systems offer?' Background paper: Review of the Development of International Environmental Management Systems-ISO 14000 Standard Series-, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.
- Orts, E. W. and P. C. Murray (1997). 'Invironmental disclosure and evidentiary privilege.' University of Illinois Law Review: 1-69.
- Roberts, P. W. and R. Greenwood (1997). 'Integrating transaction cost and institutional theories: Toward a constrained-eficiency framework for understanding organizational design adoption,' Academy ofManagement Review 22 (2): 346–373.
- Scott,W.R. (1995). Institutions and Organizations. SAGE Publications.
- Streeck, W. (1983). 'Between pluralism and corporatism: German business associations and the state,' Journal of Public Policy 3: 265–284.
- Struebing, L. (1996). '9000 standards,' Quality Progress 29 (1): 23–28.
- Tibor, T. and I. Feldman (1996). ISO 14000: AGuide to the New Environmental Management Standards. Irwin.
- Tolbert, P. S. and L. G. Zucker (1983). 'Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880-1935,' Administrative Science Quarterly 28 (1): 22–39.
- Welford, R., ed. (1996). Corporate Environmental Management, Systems and Strategies. London: Earthscan.
- Williamson, O. E. (1996). 'The institutions and governance of economic development and reform,' TheMechanisms of Governance. NewYork, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Wilson, R. (1998). 'That you don't know can definitely hurt you,' Pollution Engineering 30 (12): 33–34.
- Yano,T. (1998). 'Overview of ISO 14000 development in Asia,' ISO 9000 News. January.
- Zucker, L. G. (1983). 'Organizations as institutions,' in: S. Bacharach, Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
- Zuckerman, A. (1999). 'Using ISO 1400 as a trade barrier,' Iron Age New Steel 15 (3): 77.
- The diffusion of environmental management standards in Europe and in the United States: An institutional perspective
Volume 35, Issue 1 , pp 91-119
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Magali A. Delmas (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, 4670 Physical Sciences North, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106-5131, U.S.A.