Allen, G. E. 1986. “The Eugenics Record Office at Cold Spring Harbor, 1910-1940: An Essay in Institutional History.” Osiris
, 2nd Series 2: 225–264.Google Scholar
Allen, G. E. 1989. “Eugenics and American Social History, 1880-1950.” Genome
31: 885–889.Google Scholar
Barkan, E. 1991. “Reevaluating Progressive Eugenics: Herbert Spencer Jennings and the 1924 Immigration Legislation.” Journal of the History of Biology
24: 91–112.Google Scholar
Blakeslee, A. F. 1914. “Corn and Men.” Journal of Heredity
5: 511–517.Google Scholar
Brechin, G. 1996. “Conserving the Race: Natural Aristocracies, Eugenics, and the U.S. Conservation Movement.” Antipode
28: 229–245.Google Scholar
Conklin, E. G. 1898. “The Factors of Organic Evolution from the Standpoint of Embryology.” In Footnotes to Evolution: A Series of Popular Addresses on the Evolution of Life
, ed. D. S. Jordan. New York: D. Appleton & Company.Google Scholar
―1908. “Nature and Nurture.” Address before the Philadelphia Teacher's Convention, 21 April 1908. Edwin Grant Conklin Professional Papers, Box 16, Manuscripts Division, Department of Rare Books and Special Collections, Princeton University Library. Published with Permission of the Princeton University Library.
―1912. “Problems in Evolution and Present Methods of Attacking Them.” The American Naturalist
66(543): 122–128.Google Scholar
―1913. “Heredity and Responsibility.” Science
37: 46–54.Google Scholar
―1915. Heredity and Environment in the Development of Men. Princeton University Press.
―1916. Letter to H.A. Cotton. 4 February 1916. Edwin Grant Conklin Personal Papers, Box 30, Manuscripts Division, Department of Rare Books and Special Collections, Princeton University Library. Published with Permission of the Princeton University Library.
―1917. “Fourth of July Address, Woods Hole, MA.” Edwin Grant Conklin Professional Papers, Box 15, Manuscripts Division, Department of Rare Books and Special Collections, Princeton University Library. Published with Permission of the Princeton University Library.
―1921. Direction of Human Evolution
. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar
―1925. “Science and the Faith of the Modern.” Scribner
's Magazine 78: 452.Google Scholar
―1953. “Spiritual Autobiography.” In Thirteen Americans: Their Spiritual Autobiographies
, pp. 47–76. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Cooke, K. J. 1994. An American Gospel of Social Evolution: Religion, Education, and Biology in the Thought of Edwin Grant Conklin. Ph.D. Diss. University of Chicago.
―1998. “Human Fertility and Differential Birth Rates in American Eugenics and Genetics: A Brief History.” Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine
65: 161–166.Google Scholar
―1998. “The Limits of Heredity: Nature and Nurture in American Eugenics before 1915.” Journal of the History of Biology
3: 263–278.Google Scholar
Crevecoeur, J. H. St. John. 1783, 1997. Letters from an American Farmer. Oxford University Press.
Davenport, C. 1910. “Report of the Committee on Eugenics.” American Breeder
's Magazine 1: 128–129.Google Scholar
―1915. Letter to Edwin G. Conklin. 1 March 1915. Edwin Grant Conklin Personal Papers, Box 6, Davenport Folder, Manuscripts Division, Department of Rare Books and Special Collections, Princeton University Library. Published with Permission of the Princeton University Library.
Dix, A. S. 1997. “Experiences and Voices of Eugenics Field Workers: 'Women's Work' in Biology.” Social Studies of Science
27: 648–651.Google Scholar
Haller, M. 1963. Eugenics: Hereditarian Attitudes in American Thought. Rutgers University Press.
Huntington, E. 1937. Letter to Livingston Farrand. 1 February 1937. Livingston Farrand Papers, 1921-1939, Collection 3/5/7, Box 1, Division of Rare andManuscript Collections, Cornell University Library.
Jennings, H. S. 1910. “Experimental Evidence of the Effectiveness of Selection.” American Naturalist
44: 136–145.Google Scholar
―1917. “The Biology of Children.” In Suggestions of Modern Science Concerning Education
, eds. H. S. Jennings et al. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kerber, L. 1976. “The Republican Mother: Women and the Enlightenment — An American Perspective.” American Quarterly
28: 187–205.Google Scholar
Kevles, D. J. 1985. In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity
. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Kline, W. 2001. Building a Better Race: Gender, Sexuality, and Eugenics from the Turn of the Century to the Baby Boom. University of California Press.
Ludmerer, K. M. 1972. Genetics and American Society. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Paul, D. B. 1995. Controlling Human Heredity: 1865 to the Present
. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Pauly, P. J. 1993. “Essay Review: The Eugenics Industry — Growth or Restructuring.” Journal of the History of Biology
26: 131–145Google Scholar
Pernick, M. S. 1995. The Black Stork: Eugenics and the Death of “Defective” Babies in American Medicine and Motion Pictures since 1915. Oxford University Press.
Pickens, D. K. 1968. Eugenics and the Progressives
. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
Popenoe, P. and R. H. Johnson. 1918. Applied Eugenics
. New York: Macmillan, 1918.Google Scholar
“Preachers and Eugenics.” 1914. American Breeder
's Magazine 4: 63–64.Google Scholar
“Report of the Committee on Eugenics.” 1910. American Breeder
's Magazine 1: 129.Google Scholar
Richards, E. H. 1909. Letter to Miss Boggs. 2 December 1909, Special Collections, Vassar College Libraries.
―1910. Euthenics, the Science of Controllable Environment; a Plea for Better Living Conditions as a First Step Toward Higher Human Efficiency
. Boston: Whitcomb & Barrows.Google Scholar
Saleeby, C. W. 1909. Parenthood and Race Culture: An Outline of Eugenics
. New York: Moffat, Yard and Company.Google Scholar
Seelye, J. 1965. “Who was Horatio? The Alger Myth and American Scholarship.” American Quarterly
17: 749–756.Google Scholar
Spencer, H. G. and D. B. Paul. 1998. “The Failure of a Scientific Critique: David Heron, Karl Pearson and Mendelian Genetics.” British Journal for the History of Science
31: 441–452.Google Scholar
Stern, A. 2002. “Making Better Babies: Public Health and Race Betterment in Indiana, 1920-1935.” American Journal of Public Health
92: 742–752.Google Scholar
Stolba, C. A. 1999. A Corrupt Tree Bringeth Forth Evil Fruit: Religion and the American Eugenics Movement. Ph.D. Diss., Emory University.
Van Rensselaer, M. 1911. Letter to Mary G. Hay. 21 December 1911. New York State College of Home Economics Records, 1875-1970, Collection 23/2/749, Box 14, Division of Rare and Manuscript Collections, Cornell University Library.
―1913. Letter to Vida Hunt Francis. 6 November 1913. New York State College of Home Economics Records, 1875-1970, Collection 23/2/749, Box 13, Division of Rare and Manuscript Collections, Cornell University Library.
Vincenti, V. B. 1981. A History of the Philosophy of Home Economics. Thesis (Ph.D.) — Pennsylvania State University.
Weigley, E. S. 1974. “It Might Have Been Euthenics: The Lake Placid Conferences and the Home Economics Movement.” American Quarterly
26: 79–96.Google Scholar
Zagarri, R. 1992. “Morals, Manners, and the Republican Mother.” American Quarterly
44: 192–215.Google Scholar
Zenderland, L. 1998. “Biblical Biology: American Protestant Social Reformers and the Early Eugenics Movement.” Science in Context
11: 511–525.Google Scholar