A Social Contract for Biotechnology: Shared Visions for Risky Technologies?
- Donald M. BruceAffiliated withSociety, Religion and Technology Project, Church of Scotland, John Knox House
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Future technological developmentsconcerning food, agriculture, and theenvironment face a gulf of social legitimationfrom a skeptical public and media, in the wakeof the crises of BSE, GM food, and foot andmouth disease in the UK (House of Lords, 2000). Keyethical issues were ignored by the bioindustry,regulators, and the Government, leaving alegacy of distrust. The paper examinesagricultural biotechnology in terms of a socialcontract, whose conditions would have to be fulfilled togain acceptance of novel applications. Variouscurrent and future GM applications areevaluated against these conditions. Successwould depend critically on how far a sharedvision can be found with the public. Tore-establish trust, significant changes areidentified in the planning and pursuit ofbiotechnology.
- A Social Contract for Biotechnology: Shared Visions for Risky Technologies?
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics
Volume 15, Issue 3 , pp 279-289
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- consumer perceptions
- environmental risk
- genetic modification
- GM animals
- GM food
- GM crops
- shared vision
- social contract
- Donald M. Bruce (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Society, Religion and Technology Project, Church of Scotland, John Knox House, 45 High Street, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH1 1SR, UK