Ainslie, G. (1986), Beyond microeconomics. Conflict among interests in a multiple self as a determinant of value, in Elster J. (ed.),

*The Multiple Self*, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Google ScholarAinslie, G. (1993),

*Picoeconomics*, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Google ScholarAsheim, G.B. (1997), Individual and collective time-consistency, *Review of Economic Studies* 64: 427–443.

Bernasconi, M. (1994), Non-linear preferences and two-stage lotteries: Theories and evidence, *The Economic Journal* 104: 54–70.

Border, K.C. and Segal, U. (1994), Dynamic consistency implies approximately expected utility preferences, *Journal of Economic Theory* 63: 170–188.

Bratman, M.E. (1992), Planning and the stability of intention, *Minds and Machines* 1: 1–16.

Busemeyer, J.R., Weg, E., Barkan, R., Li, X. and Ma, Z. (2000), Dynamic and consequential consistency of choices between paths of decision trees, *Journal of Experimental Psychology* 129, 530–545.

Camerer, C.F. (1989) An experimental test of several generalized utility theories, *Journal of Risk and Uncertainty* 2: 61–104.

Cubitt, R.P., Starmer, C. and Sugden, R. (1998), Dynamic choice and the common ratio effect: an experimental investigation, *The Economic Journal* 108: 1362–1380.

Dardadoni, V. (1990), Implications of behavioral consistency in dynamic choice under uncertainty, *Theory and Decision* 29: 223–234.

De Helian, L. and McClennen, E.F. (1993), Planning and the stability of intention: a comment, *Minds and Machines* 2: 319–333.

Elster, J. (1979),

*Ulysses and the Sirens*, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Google ScholarElster, J. (1983),

*Sour Grapes*, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Google ScholarEpstein, L. (1992), Behavior under risk: Recent developments in theory and applications, in Laffont. J.J. (ed.),

*Advances in Economic Theory: Sixth World Congress*, Vol. II, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Google ScholarEpstein, L. and Le Breton, M. (1993), Dynamically consistent beliefs must be Bayesian, *Journal of Economic Theory* 61: 1–22.

Etchart, N. (1999), Sequential choices and non-EU decision making under risk: a synthetic discussion, Working Paper, GRID, 99-09.

Ghirardato, P. (1997), Consistency and independence in decision making with non-separable preferences, Mimeo, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology.

Hammond, P.J. (1976), Changing tastes and coherent dynamic choice, *Review of Economic Studies* 43: 159–173.

Hammond, P.J. (1988a), Consequentialism and the independence axiom, in Munier, B.R. (ed.),

*Risk Decision and Rationality*, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Google ScholarHammond, P.J. (1988b), Consequentialist foundations for expected utility, *Theory and Decision* 25: 25–78.

Hammond, P.J. (1989), Consistent plans, consequentialism, and expected utility, *Econometrica* 57 (6): 1445–1449.

Jaffray, J.-Y. (1998), Implementing resolute choice under uncertainty, Mimeo, LIP6, UPMC (Paris 6).

Jaffray, J.-Y. (1999), Rational decision making with imprecise probabilities, in *1st International Symposium on Imprecise Probabilities and Their Applications*, 183–188, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

Johnson, J.G. and Busemeyer, J.R. (2001), Multistage decision making: The effect of planning horizon on dynamic consistency, Communication given at the Fur X Conference in Turin, Italy.

Karni, E. and Safra, Z. (1988), Behavioral consistency in sequential decisions, Mimeo, Department of Political Economy, John Hopkins University.

Karni, E. and Safra, Z. (1989), Ascending bid auctions with behaviorally consistent bidders, *Annals of Operational Research* 19: 435–446.

Karni, E. and Safra, Z. (1990), Behaviorally consistent optimal stopping rules, *Journal of Economic Theory* 51: 391–402.

Karni, E. and Schmeidler, D. (1991a), Atemporal dynamic consistency and expected utility theory, *Journal of Economic Theory* 54: 401–408.

Karni, E. and Schmeidler, D. (1991b), Utility theory with uncertainty, in Hildenbrand, W. and Sonnenschein, H. (eds.),

*Handbook of Mathematical Economics*, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Google ScholarKavka, G.S. (1983), The toxin puzzle,

*Analysis*, 43: 33–36.

Google ScholarKeller, L.R. (1992), Properties of utility theories and related empirical phenomena, in Edwards, W. (ed.),

*Utility Theories: Measurements and Applications*, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Google ScholarLaibson, D. (1997), Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting, *Quaterly Journal of Economics* 112 (2): 443–477.

McClennen, E.F. (1988a), Ordering and independence: a comment on Professor Seidenfeld, *Economics and Philosophy* 4: 298–308.

McClennen, E.F. (1988b), Dynamic choice and rationality, in Munier, B. (ed.),

*Risk, Decision and Rationality*, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Google ScholarMcClennen, E.F. (1990),

*Rationality and Dynamic Choice: Foundational Explorations*, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Google ScholarMcClennen, E.F. (1997), Pragmatic rules and rationality, *Philosophy and Public Affairs* 26: 210–258.

Machina, M. (1989), Dynamic consistency and non-expected utility models of choice under uncertainty, *Journal of Economic Literature* 28: 1622–1668.

Munier, B. (1994), Hammond’s consequentialism: a qualification, in Arrow, K.J., Colombatto, E., Pearlman, M. and Schmidt, Ch. (eds.),

*Rational Foundations of Economic Behaviour*, London: McMillan.

Google ScholarNielsen, T.D. and Jaffray, J.-Y. (2001), An operational approach to rational decision making based on rank dependent utility, Department of Computer Science, Denmark, Université Paris 6, France, Unpublished Manuscript.

Google ScholarO’Donoghue, T. and Rabin, M. (1999), Doing it now or later, *American Economic Review* 89 (1): 103–124.

Orphanides, A. and Zervos, D. (1998), Myopia and addictive behaviour, *The Economic Journal* 108: 75–91.

Paradiso, M. and Hey, J. (1999), Dynamic choice and timing-independence: an experimental investigation, Communication given at the Fur IX Conference in Marrakesh, Morocco.

Pollak, R.A. (1968), Consistent planning,

*Review of Economic Studies*, 35: 201–208.

Google ScholarRabinowicz, W. (1995), To have one’s cake and eat it too: sequential choice and expected-utility violations, *Journal of Philosophy* 92: 586–620.

Rabinowicz, W. (1997), On Seidenfeld’s criticism of sophisticated violations of the independence axiom, *Theory and Decision* 43: 279–292.

Rabinowicz, W. (2000), Preference stability and substitution of indifferents: a rejoinder to Seidenfeld, *Theory and Decision* 48: 311–318.

Sarin, R. and Wakker, P. (1998), Dynamic choice and nonexpected utility, *Journal of Risk and Uncertainty* 17: 87–119.

Schelling, T.C. (1984), Self-command in practice, in policy and in a theory of rational choice, *American Economic Review* 74 (2): 1–11.

Schlee, E. (1990), The value of information in anticipated utility theory, *Journal of Risk and Uncertainty* 3: 83–92.

Segal, U. (1990), Two-stage lotteries without the reduction axiom, *Econometrica* 58: 349–377.

Segal, U. (1992), The independence axiom versus the reduction axiom: must we have both?, in Edwards, W. (ed.),

*Utility Theories: Measurements and Applications*, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Google ScholarSegal, U. (1997), Dynamic consistency and reference points, *Journal of Economic Theory* 72: 208–219.

Seidenfeld, T. (1988a), Decision theory without ‘independence’ or without ‘ordering’: what is the difference?, *Economics and Philosophy* 4: 267–290.

Seidenfeld, T. (1988b), Rejoinder [to Hammond and McClennen], *Economics and Philosophy* 4: 309–315.

Seidenfeld, T. (2000a), Substitution of indifferent options at choice nodes and admissibility: a reply to Rabinowicz, *Theory and Decision* 48: 305–310.

Seidenfeld, T. (2000b), The independence postulate, hypothetical and called-off acts: a further reply to Rabinowicz, *Theory and Decision* 48: 319–322.

Strotz, R.H. (1956), Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximisation, *Review of Economic Studies* 23: 165–180.

Thaler, R.H. and Shefrin H.M. (1981), An economic theory of self control, *Journal of Political Economy* 89 (2): 392–406.

Vergnaud, J.-C. (1994), Essais sur la Théorie du Choix dans l’Incertain, PhD Dissertation, University of Paris IX Dauphine, October.

Von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O. (1944),

*Theory of Games and Economic Behavior*, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Google ScholarWakker, P. (1988), Nonexpected utility as aversion of information, *Journal of Behavioral Decision Making* 1: 169–175.

Wakker, P. (1996), Not only counterfactual outcomes but also counterfactual decisions are relevant for dynamically consistent updating under nonexpected utility, Mimeo, Center for Economic Research, University of Tilburg, The Netherlands.

Google ScholarWakker, P. (1999), Justifying bayesianism by dynamic decision principles, Mimeo, Medical Decision making Unit, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands.

Google Scholar