Argumentation

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 47–57

The Limits of Explication

Authors

  • Michael Scriven
    • Department of Philosophy and PsychologyClaremont Graduate University
Article

DOI: 10.1023/A:1014917625208

Cite this article as:
Scriven, M. Argumentation (2002) 16: 47. doi:10.1023/A:1014917625208

Abstract

Part of logic consists in uncovering ways in which logical processes of great universality and utility are over-extended, e.g., in the misguided search for the cause of everything. It is suggested here that the search for missing premises defined as premises that make a deduction out of every argument has its own limits of sense. While often useful, it is sometimes just wrongly used by requiring that the reconstructed argument have the same categorical conclusion as the original one; and sometimes inappropriately used when the argument itself does not rest upon assumptions different from itself.

deductiondeductive reconstructionenthymemeexplicationlimits of explication
Download to read the full article text

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002