, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 47–57

The Limits of Explication

  • Michael Scriven

DOI: 10.1023/A:1014917625208

Cite this article as:
Scriven, M. Argumentation (2002) 16: 47. doi:10.1023/A:1014917625208


Part of logic consists in uncovering ways in which logical processes of great universality and utility are over-extended, e.g., in the misguided search for the cause of everything. It is suggested here that the search for missing premises defined as premises that make a deduction out of every argument has its own limits of sense. While often useful, it is sometimes just wrongly used by requiring that the reconstructed argument have the same categorical conclusion as the original one; and sometimes inappropriately used when the argument itself does not rest upon assumptions different from itself.

deduction deductive reconstruction enthymeme explication limits of explication 

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Scriven
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Philosophy and PsychologyClaremont Graduate UniversityClaremontU.S.A

Personalised recommendations