Journal impact measures in bibliometric research
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
The Impact Factor introduced by Eugene Garfield is a fundamental citation-based measure for significance and performance of scientific journals. It is perhaps the most popular bibliometric product used in bibliometrics itself, as well as outside the scientific community. First, a concise review of the background and history of the ISI impact factor and the basic ideas underlying it are given. A cross-citation matrix is used to visualise the construction of the Impact Factor and several related journal citation measures.Both strengths and flaws of the impact factor are discussed. Several attempts made by different authors to introduce more sophisticated journal citation measures and the reasons why many indicators aiming at a correction of methodological limitations of the Impact Factor were not successful are described. The next section is devoted to the analysis of basic technical and methodological aspects. In this context, the most important sources of possible biases and distortions for calculation and use of journal citation measures are studied. Thereafter, main characteristics of application contexts are summarised. The last section is concerned with questions of statistical reliability of journal citation measures. It is shown that in contrast to a common misbelief statistical methods can be applied to discrete "skewed" distributions, and that the statistical reliability of these statistics can be used as a basis for application of journal impact measures in comparative analyses. Finally, the question of sufficiency or insufficiency of a single, howsoever complex measure for characterising the citation impact of scientific journals is discussed.
- Allison, P. (1980), Inequality of scientific productivity, Social Studies of Science, 10: 163-179.
- Asai, I. (1981), Adjusted age distribution and its application to Impact Factor and Immediacy Index, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32:172-174.
- Braun, T., GlÄnzel, W. (1995), On a source of error in computing Journal Impact Factors, Chemical Intelligencer, January, 31-32.
- Braun, T., GlÄnzel, W., Schubert, A. (1989), Some data on the distribution of journal publication types in the Science Citation Index Database, Scientometrics, 15: 325-330. CrossRef
- Garfield, E. (1972), Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation, Science, 178: 471-479.
- Garfield, E., Citation Indexing: Its Theory and Applications in Science, Technology and Humanities, New York: Wiley, 1979.
- Garfield, E. (1986), The evolution of physical chemistry to chemical physics, Current Contents, 3: 3-12.
- Garfield, E. (1987), Why are the impacts of leading medical journal so similar yet so different: Item-by-item audits reveal a diversity of editorial materials, Current Contents, January 12.
- Geller, N. L. (1978), Citation influence methodology of Pinski and Narin, Information Processing and Management, 14: 93-95. CrossRef
- GlÄnzel, W., Schubert, A. (1988), Characteristic scores and scales in assessing citation impact, Journal of Information Science, 14: 123-127.
- GlÄnzel, W., Schubert, A. (1995), Predictive aspects of a stochastic model for citation processes, Information Processing & Management, 31: 69-80. CrossRef
- GlÄnzel, W., Schoepflin, U. (1994), A stochastic model for the ageing analyses of scientific literature, Scientometrics, 30: 49-64. CrossRef
- GlÄnzel, W., Schoepflin, U. (1995), A bibliometric study on ageing and reception processes of scientific literature, Journal of Information Science, 21: 37-53.
- Hirst, G. (1978), Discipline Impact Factor: a method for determining core journal lists, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 29: 171-172.
- Ingwersen, P., Larsen, B., Wormell, I. (2000), Applying diachronous citation analysis to research program evaluations, In: Cronin, B., Atkins, H. B. (Eds). The Web of Knowledge: A Festschrift in Honor of Eugene Garfield, Medford, N. J.: Information Today, Inc. & American Society for Information Science, pp. 373-387.
- Ingwersen, P., Larsen, B., Rousseau, R., Russell., J. (2001), The publication-citation matrix and its derived quantities, Chinese Science Bulletin, 46: 524-528. CrossRef
- Lindsey, D. (1978), Corrected quality ratio: A composite index of scientific contribution to knowledge, Social Studies of Science, 8: 349-354.
- Moed, H. F., van Leeuwen, Th. N. (1995), Improving the accuracy of the Institute for Scientific Information's Journal Impact Factor, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46: 461-467. CrossRef
- Moed, H. F., van Leeuwen, Th. N. (1996), Impact Factors can mislead, Nature, 381: 186. CrossRef
- Moed, H. F., van Leeuwen, Th. N., Reedijk, J. (1996), A critical analysis of the Journal Impact Factors of Angewandte Chemie and the Journal of the American Chemical Society: Inaccuracies in published impact factors based on overall citations only, Scientometrics, 37: 105-115. CrossRef
- Moed, H.F., van Leeuwen, Th. N., Reedijk, J. (1998), A new classification system to describe the ageing of scientific journals and their impact factors. Journal of Documentation, 54: 387-419. CrossRef
- Moed, H.F., van Leeuwen, Th. N., Reedijk, J. A. (1999), Towards appropriate indicators of journal impact, Scientometrics, 46: 575-589 CrossRef
- Pinski, G., Narin, F. (1976), Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications, Information Processing and Management, 12: 297-312. CrossRef
- Price, D. J. de Solla ( 1970), Citation measures of hard science, soft science, technology, and non-science, In: C. E. Nelson, D. K. Pollak (Eds), Communication among Scientists and Engineers (Heat, Lexington, Mass. pp. 1-12.
- Rousseau, R. (1988), Citation distribution of pure mathematics journals. In: L. Egghe, R. Rousseau (Eds), Informetrics 87/88, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., pp. 249-260.
- Schubert, A., GlÄnzel W. (1983), Statistical reliability of comparisons based on the citation impact of scientific publications, Scientometrics, 5: 59-74. CrossRef
- Schubert, A., GlÄnzel, W. (1986), Mean response time. A new indicator of journal citation speed with application to physics journals, Czechoslovakian Journal of Physics, B 36: 121-125. CrossRef
- Schubert, A., GlÄnzel, W., Braun, T. (1987), Subject field characteristic citation scores and scales for assessing research performance, Scientometrics, 12: 267-291. CrossRef
- Schubert, A., GlÄnzel, W., Braun, T. (1989), Scientometric Datafiles. A comprehensive set of indicators on 2649 journals and 96 countries in all major fields and subfields 1981-1985, Scientometrics, 16: 3-478. CrossRef
- Seglen, P. O. (1997), Citations and Journal Impact Factors: Questionable indicators of research quality, Allergy, 52: 1050-1056.
- Smart, J. C., Elton, C. F. (1982), Consumption factor scores of psychology journals, Scientometrics, 4: 349-360. CrossRef
- Todorov, R. (1983), Condensed matter physics journals, Scientometrics, 5: 291-301. CrossRef
- Todorov, R., GlÄnzel, W. (1988), Journal citation measures: A concise review, Journal of Information Science, 14: 47-56.
- Tomer, C. (1986), A statistical assessment of two measures of citation: the impact factor and the immediacy index, Information Processing and Management, 22: 251-258. CrossRef
- van Leeuwen, Th. N., Moed, H. F., Reedijk, J. (1997), JACS still topping Angewandte Chemie: Beware of erroneous impact factors, Chemical Intelligencer, July, 32-36.
- Wallace, D. P. (1986), The relationship between journal productivity and obsolescence, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37: 136-145. CrossRef
- Yanovsky, V. I. (1981), Citation analysis significance of scientific journals, Scientometrics, 3: 223-233. CrossRef
- Journal impact measures in bibliometric research
Volume 53, Issue 2 , pp 171-193
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors