Should Creationism be Taught in the Public Schools?
- Robert T. Pennock
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
This article discusses philosophicalarguments relevant to the question of teachingcreationism, especially with regard to developments inthe debate since the early 1990s.Section 1 reviews the newfactions within the creationist movement, and theoverlapping views from ‘young earth’ to ‘intelligentdesign’ creationism, as well as non-Christianvarieties. It also considers what are the relevantdifferences for the policy question for private,public schools, and for home schoolers, as well aspossible differences in what it means to ‘teach’creationism. Sections 2 & 3 discuss the main legal argumentsthat have ruled in the public school case, as well asarguments from academic freedom, fairness, censorship,parental rights and majority rule. Section 4 evaluates theepistemological issues regarding competing claims oftruth, and the contention that excluding ‘whatChristians know’ (Alvin Plantinga) amounts to‘viewpoint discrimination’ (Phillip Johnson). Section 5argues that religious protection arguments actuallyfavor excluding creationism more than including it. Section 6 considers the goals of education, especiallyDewey's views on science education, and what theseimply regarding the teaching of a ‘theistic science’. In Section 7, I review a new argument of Alvin Plantingabased upon a purported Rawlsian basic right of aparent not to have her children taught anything thatviolates her comprehensive beliefs, and show whyRawlsian agents would reject it.
- Aubrey, Frank: 1998 (1980), ‘Yes, Virginia, There Is a Creation Model’, Reports of the National Center for Science Education 18(1), 6.
- Bishop, George: 1998, ‘What Americans Believe about Evolution and Religion: A Cross-NationalPerspective’, Paper read at 53rd Annual conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, at St. Louis, Missouri.
- Cremo, Michael A. & Thompson, Richard L.: 1993, Forbidden Archeology: The Hidden History of the Human Race, Govardhan Hill Publishing, Alachua, FL.
- Davis, Percival & Kenyon, Dean H.: 1993, Of Pandas and People, Haughton Publishing Co., Dallas, Texas.
- Dewey, John: 1964 (1910), ‘Science as Subject Matter and as Method’, in R.D. Archambault (ed.), John Dewey on Education: Selected Writings, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
- Dewey, John: 1964 (1938), ‘The Relation of Science and Philosophy as a Basis of Education’, in R. D. Archambault (ed.), John Dewey on Education: Selected Writings, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
- Duvall, J. ed.: 1995, ‘School Board Tackles Creationism Debate’, CNN Interactive (WWW), November 5.
- Gilkey, Langdon: 1985, Creationism On Trial: Evolution and God at Little Rock, Winston Press, Minneapolis, MN.
- Johnson, Phillip E.: 1991, Darwin on Trial, 1st edition. Regnery Gateway, Washington, D.C.
- Johnson, Phillip E.: 1995, Reason in the Balance: The Case Against Naturalism in Science, Law & Education, InterVarsity Press, Downers Grove, IL.
- Kitcher, Philip: 1982, Abusing Science: The Case Against Creationism, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
- La Follette, Marcel Chotkowski, ed.: 1983, Creationism, Science, and the Law: The Arkansas Case, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
- Larson, Edward J.: 1989, Trial And Error: The American Controversy over Creation and Evolution, Updated edition. Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford.
- Larson, Edward J.: 1997, Summer for the Gods: The Scopes Trial annd America's Continuing Debate over Science and Religion, Basic Books, New York, NY.
- Pennock, Robert T.: 1996, ‘Naturalism, Evidence and Creationism: The Case of Phillip Johnson’, Biology and Philosophy 11(4): 543-559.
- Pennock, Robert T.: 1999, Tower of Babel: The Evidence against the New Creationism, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
- Plantinga, Alvin: 1997, ‘Methodological Naturalism?’, Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith 49(3), 143-154.
- Plantinga, Alvin: 1998, ‘Creation and Evolution: A Modest Proposal’, unpublished conference paper.
- Rawls, John: 1971, A Theory of Justice, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
- Reisch, George A.: 1998, ‘Pluralism, Logical Empiricism, and the Problem of Pseudoscience’, Philosophy of Science 65, 333-348.
- Ruse, Michael, ed.: 1988, But Is It Science? The Philosophical Question in the Creation/Evolution Controversy, Prometheus Books, Buffalo, NY.
- Schadewald, Robert: 1989, ‘The Earth was Flat in Zion’, Fate, May, 70-79.
- Siegel, Harvey: 1984, ‘The Response to Creationism’, Educational Studies 15(4), 349-364.
- Smith, Mike U., Harvey Siegel & Joseph D. McInerney: 1995, ‘Foundational Issues in Evolution Education’, Science & Education 4, 23-40.
- Should Creationism be Taught in the Public Schools?
Science & Education
Volume 11, Issue 2 , pp 111-133
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Philosophy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA