The Accuracy of Forest Damage Assessments – Experiences from Sweden
- Sören Wulff
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
In this article the consistency of forest damageassessments on conifer trees is analysed, by usingdifferent methods in estimating the accuracy inassessments of defoliation and discolouration. The dataoriginate from control surveys in the Swedish nationalforest damage survey, as well as from national andinternational training courses. Standard deviation ofdifferences in the assessment of defoliation on singletrees is found to be about 10% units for Norway spruceand 8.5% for Scots pine. Problems in correctly assessingdamaged Scots pine trees and discoloured Norway sprucetrees are revealed by measures of agreement (Kappastatistic). Results from several years of nationaltraining courses indicate that, on an average, theobserver teams do not significantly differ from a nationalstandard, but significant differences between observerteams are found. The presented estimates indicate asubstantial within observer error compared to the betweenobserver error. The results indicate that the long-termdevelopment of forest damage, rather than short-termfluctuations, is the most important information fromthese kinds of inventories.
- Aamlid, D. and Horntvedt, R.: 1997, ‘Intercalibration Course for Northern Europe on Crown Condition Assessment’, inD. Aamlid (ed.), Crown Condition Assessment in the Nordic Countries. Proceedings from an Intercalibration Coarse for Northern Europe on Crown Condition Assessment, 24–25 June 1997, Norway, Aktuelt fra Skogforsk. Norwegian Institute of Forest Research, Report No. 10/97, pp. 3–10.
- Cohen, J.: 1960, ‘A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales’, Educ. Psych. Measure. 20, 37–46.
- Czaplewski, R. L.:1977, ‘Variance Approximations for Assessments of Classification Accuracy’, USDA Forest Service, Research Paper RM—316.
- Dobbertin, M., Landmann, G., Pierrat, J. C. and Müller-Edzards, C.: 1997, ‘Quality of Crown Condition Data’, in C. Müller#x2014;Edzards, W. De Vries and J. W. Erisman (eds), Ten Years of Monitoring Forest Condition in Europe #x2014; Studies on Temporal Development, Spatial Distribution and Impacts of Natural and Anthropogenic Stress Factors, EC#x2014;UN/ECE, Brussels and Geneva, pp. 7–22.
- Ferretti, M., Bussotti, F., Cenni, E. and Cozzi, A.: 1999, ‘Implementation of quality assurance procedures in the Italian programs of forest condition monitoring’, Water, Air, Soil Pollut. 116, 371–376.
- Fleiss, J. L., Cohen, J. and Everitt, B. S.: 1969, ‘Large sample standarderrors of kappa and weighted kappa’, Psych. Bull. 72, 597–603.
- Ghosh, S. and Innes, J. L.: 1995, ‘Combining field and controlTeam Assessments to obtain error estimates for surveys of crown condition’, Scand. J. Forest Res. 10, 264–270.
- Ghosh, S., Innes, J. L.and Hoffmann, C.: 1995, ‘Observer variation as a source of error in assessments of crown condition through time’, Forest Sci. 41, 235–254.
- Innes, J. L.: 1988, ‘Forest health surveys: Problems in assessing observer objectivity’, Can. J. Forest Res. 18,560–565.
- Innes, J. L.: 1993, Forest Health: It’s Assessment and Status, CAB International, Wallingford, U.K., 677 p.
- Innes, J.L., Landmann, G. and Mettendorf, B.: 1993, ‘Consistency of observations of forest tree defoliation in three European countries’, Environ. Monit. Assess. 25, 29–40.
- Köhl, M.: 1991, ‘Waldschadensinventuren: Mögliche Ursachen der Variation der Nadel-’Blattverlustschätzung zwischen Beobachtern und Folgerungen für Kontrollaufnahmen’, Allgemeine Forst-und Jagdzeitung 162, 210–221.
- Köhl, M.: 1993, ‘Forest Health Monitoring: Crown Transparency Assessment and Observer Bias’, in M. Köhl and G. Z. Gertner (eds),Statistical Methods, Mathematics and Computers, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research, Birmensdorf, pp. 149–163.
- Müller-Edzards, C., De Vries, W. and Erisman, J. W. (eds): 1997, ‘Ten Years of Monitoring Forest Condition in Europe — studies ontemporal development, Spatial Distribution and impacts of natural and anthropogenic stress factors’, EC-UN/ECE, Brussels and Geneva, 386 p.
- Solberg, S.: 1999, ‘Crown density assessment, control surveys and reproducibility’, Environ. Monit. Assess. 56, 75–96.
- Strand, G.#x2014;H.: 1996, ‘Detection of observer bias in ongoing forest health monitoringprogrammes#x2019;, Can. J. Forest Res. 26, 1692–1696.
- Stoen, O. G., Eriksen, R. and Nelleman, C.: 1997, ‘National Monitoring of Forest Vitality in Norway #x2014; Control 1995 and 1996’,Norwegian Institute of Land Inventory, NIJOS#x2014;report no. 9/97, 78 p.
- UN/ECE.: 1998, ‘Manual on methods and criteria forharmonized sampling, assessment, monitoring and analysis of the effects of air pollution on forests’, 4th ed., Programme Coordinating Centre in Federal Research Centre for Forestry Products (BFH), Hamburg.
- Wulff, S.: 1996, ‘Forest Condition in Sweden 1994’, inU. Söderberg and S. Wulff (eds), Monitoring Forest Damage in the Nordic Countries. Selected Proceedings from Meeting in the SNS-ad hoc Group on Monitoring of Forest Damage, 9–10 May 1995, Umeå, Sweden. SLU, Department of Forest Resource Management and Geomatics, Report 4, 1996, pp. 37–45.
- The Accuracy of Forest Damage Assessments – Experiences from Sweden
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Volume 74, Issue 3 , pp 295-309
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- kappa statistic
- observer error
- Industry Sectors
- Sören Wulff (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Forest Resource Management and Geomatics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden