Skip to main content
Log in

The Determinants of Stock Price Volatility: An Industry Study

  • Published:
Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences

Abstract

The currently ongoing IT-revolution is a great challenge for economists. The industry displays ever arising new technologies, unstable market shares, long-term swings, and short-term volatility of stock prices. Yet, to study those phenomena empirically one is constrained by a lack of data. The U.S. auto industry, for which long-term time series are available, has shared a similar experience since its early development. This paper studies how long-term swings and short-term stock price volatility in the U.S. auto industry is related to innovative efforts and switching of market shares of firms. The early period of the life-cycle of the industry was characterized by high product innovation, high market share instability, volatile stock prices, and the later period by fewer firms, process innovation, more stable market shares and less stock price volatility. In this paper we focus on the “transition” period leading from the first to the second period and study the relation of innovative effort, market share fluctuations and stock price dynamics. After presenting stylized facts on the life-cycle of the industry we introduce a dynamic model that is able to replicate some of the stylized facts. The dynamic model admits heterogeneous firms and encompasses both evolutionary as well as optimizing approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Abernathy, W., Clark, K., & Kantrow, A. (1983). Industrial renaissance: Producing a competitive future for America, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for innovation. In R. Nelson (Ed.), The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors. (pp. 104–119) Princeton, Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, B. (1989). Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-In by historical events. Economic Journal, 99116–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, B. (1994). Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, W., & Morse, D. (1978). What determines price-earnings ratios. Financial Analysts Journal, July: 65-76.

  • Campbell, J., & Shiller, R. (1988). The dividend-price ratio and expectations of future dividends and discount factors. Review of Financial Studies, 14195–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. (1997). The innovators dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston, MA: HBS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P., & Stiglitz, J. (1980a). Industrial structure and the nature of innovative activities. Economic Journal, 90266–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P., & Stiglitz, J. (1980b). Uncertainty, industrial structure and the speed of innovation. The Bell Journal of Economics, 11(1), 143–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G., Marsili, O., Orsenigo, L., & Salavatore, R. (1995), Learning, market selection and the evolution of industrial structures, Small Business Economics, 7411–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feichtinger, G. (1992). Hopf bifurcation in an advertising diffusion model. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 17401–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gort, M., & Klepper, S. (1982). Time paths in the diffusion of product innovations. Economic Journal, 92.

  • Hamel, G. (1998). Opinion, strategy innovation and the quest for value. Sloan Management Review, Winter: 7-14.

  • Henderson, R., & Clark, K. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 359–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobijn, B., & Jovanovic, B. (1999). The Information Technology Revolution and the Stock Market: Preliminary Evidence, Dept. of Economics, New York University, mimeo.

  • Hofbauer, J., & Sigmund, K. (1988). Evolutionary theory and dynamic systems. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jovanovic, B., & MacDonald, G. (1994). The life-cycle of a competitive industry. Journal of Political Economy, 102322–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jovanovic, B., & Greenwood, D. (1999). The information technology revolution and the stock market. American Economic Review, 89116–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kester, C. W. (1984). Today's options for tomorrow's growth. Harvard Business Review, 62153–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, B. H. (1977). Dynamic economics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klepper, S., & Simons, K. (1997). Technological extinctions of industrial firms: An inquiry into their nature and causes. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6379–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malerba, F., & Orsenigo, L. (1996). The dynamics and evolution of industries. Industrial and Corporate Change, 551–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markides, C. (1998). Strategic innovation in established companies. Sloan Management Review, 39(3), 31–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzucato, M. (1998). A computational model of economies of scale and market share instability. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 955–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzucato, M., & Semmler, W. (1999). Stock market volatility and market share instability during the US automobile industry life-cycle. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 967–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryals, S. D. (1985). Secular and cyclical trends in price-earnings ratios. Business Economics, 2019–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semmler, W. (1994). Information, innovation and diffusion of technologies. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 445–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semmler, W., & Greiner, A. (1996), Inventive investment and the diffusion of technology. Revue International de Systemique, 100

  • Semmler, W., & Sieveking, M. (1994). On the optimal extraction of interacting resources. Journal of Economics, 5923–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiller, R. J. (1989). Market volatility. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiller, R. J. (2001). Irrational exeberance. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A., & Summers, L. H. (1990). Noise trader approach to finance, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 419–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverberg, G., Dosi, G., & Orsenigo, L. (1988). Innovation, diversity and diffusion: A self-organizing model, Economic Journal, 98(393), 1032–1054.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svirezhev, Y., & Logofet, D. (1983). Stability of biological communities. Moscow: Mir Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, J. (1998). Technology and Market Structure, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M., & Anderson, P. (1986). Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31439–465.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Willi Semmler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mazzucato, M., Semmler, W. The Determinants of Stock Price Volatility: An Industry Study. Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci 6, 197–216 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014018429565

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014018429565

Navigation