Can animations be safely used in court?
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
As courts become increasingly technologically sophisticated, it can be expected that the use of the latest visualisation techniques will also increase to make the most of this technology. In particular, the use of computer-generated animations can be expected to become more dominant. There is, however, very little research into the effects of animated evidence on jurors and other members of the judicial process. This paper investigates whether there is a difference in the quality and robustness of memories formed by either hearing an oral testimony or seeing an animated version of it. Also, the paper investigates whether different opinions and attitudes are produced when testimony is presented as an animation as opposed to being verbally presented. Preliminary results reported here indicate that there is indeed a difference in attitude (and therefore potential bias) when animations are used instead of verbal testimony, but that this difference is only apparent in the long term (four weeks or more after the presentation of the animated evidence). The results point to the need for improved knowledge structures for mapping verbal testimony into animations, where issues of implicit knowledge and potential bias are explicitly referenced in the knowledge structure. The paper argues that, until and unless such issues are addressed, it is not safe to use animations in court except to present purely factual information.
- Baddeley, A. (1990). Human Memory-Theory and Practice. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Berkoff, A. T. (1994). Computer Simulations in Litigation. Marquette Law Review 77: 829-855.
- Borelli, M. (1996). The Computer as Advocate: An Approach to Computer-Generated Displays in the Courtroom. Indiana Law Journal 71. Available from http://www.law.indiana.edu/ilj/v71/no2/borelli.html.
- Casper, J. and Benedict (1993). The Influence of Outcome Information and Attitudes on Juror Decision Making in Search and Seizure Cases. In Hastie R. (ed.) Inside the Juror: The Psychology of Juror Decision Making. Cambridge University Press, 65-83.
- Fischhoff, B. (1975). Hindsight ? Foresight: The Effect of Outcome Knowledge on Judgement Under Uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1: 288-299.
- Gillund, G. and Shiffrin, R. M. (1981). Free Recall of Complex Pictures and Abstract Words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 20: 575-592.
- Goldstein, W. M. and Hogarth, R. M. (1997). Research on Judgements and Decision Making-Currents, Connections and Controversies. Cambridge University Press.
- Groger, J. A. (1997). Memory and Remembering-Everyday Memory in Context. Longman.
- Hant and O'Shanick, G. J. (1993). Forgetting Rates for Verbal, Pictorial and Figural Stimuli. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Psychology 15: 245-265.
- Hastie, R. (ed.) (1993). Inside the Juror-the Psychology of Juror Decision Making. Cambridge University Press.
- Hawkins, S. A. and Hastie, R. (1990). Hindsight: Biased Judgements of Past Events after the Outcomes are Known. Psychological Bulletin 107: 311-327.
- Henderson, L. (1996). Lord Woolf and Information Technology. Information & Communications Technology Law 5(1): 45-56.
- Hibbin, S. (1999). The Use of Animations for Presenting Legal Evidence. MPhil Dissertation. Department of Computer Science, University of Exeter, UK.
- Hoey, A. (1996). Analysis of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act s.69-Computer Generated Evidence. Web Journal of Current Legal Issues. Available from http://webjcli.ncl.ac.uk/1996/issue1/hoey1/html.
- Houston, J. M., Joiner, C. L., Uddo, F., Harper, C. and Stroll, A. (1995). Computer Animation in Mock Juries' Decision Making. Psychological Reports 76: 987-993.
- Kaplan, M. F. and Miller, L. E. (1978). Reducing the Effects of Juror Bias. Journal of Experimental Psychology 36: 1443-1455.
- Kennedy, A. and Wilkes, A. (eds.) (1975). Studies in Long Term Memory. John Wiley and Sons.
- Kinnear, P. R. and Gray, C. D. (1999). SPSS for Windows Made Simple. Psychology Press.
- Lederer, F. I. (1996). Technologically Augmented Litigation. Information & Communications Technology Law 5: 215-225.
- Loftus, E. F. and Palmer, J. C. (1974). Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction. An Example of the Interaction between Language and Memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 13: 585-589.
- McKevitt, P. (1995). Artificial Intelligence Review (Ed.). 9, Kluwer.
- Narayanan, A., Ford, L., Manuel, D., Tallis, D. and Yazdani, M. (1994). Animating Language. Integration of Natural Language and Vision Processing: Workshop Notes. American Association for Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-94) Workshop Programme, 55-65.
- Narayanan, A., Manuel, D., Ford, L., Tallis, D. and Yazdani, M. (1995). Language Visualisation: Applications and Theoretical Foundations of a Primitive-Based Approach. Artificial Intelligence Review 9(2-3): 215-235.
- Narayanan, A., Penny, G., Hibbin, S., Lochun, S. and Milne, W. (1999). On Using Animations in Court. Information & Communications Technology Law 8(2): 151-163.
- O'Flaherty, D. (1996). Computer-Generated Displays in the Courtroom: For Better or Worse? Web Journal of Current Legal Issues. Available from: http://webjcli.ncl.ac.uk/1996/issue4/oflah4.html
- Roediger, M. K. and McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating False Memories: Remembering Words that Were not Presented in Lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology; Learning, Memory and Cognition 21, 803-814.
- Schank, R. C. (1972). Conceptual Dependency: A Theory of Natural Language Understanding. Cognitive Psychology 3: 552-631.
- Schank, R. C. and Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding. Erlbaum.
- Schank, R. C. (1982). Dynamic Memory. Cambridge University Press.
- Standing, L. (1973). Learning 10,000 Pictures. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 25: 207-221.
- Widdison, R. (1997). Beyond Woolf: The Virtual Court House. Web Journal of Current Legal Issues. Available from http://webjcli.ncl.ac.uk/1997/issue2/widdison2.html.
- Woolf Report (1996). Access to Justice: Final Report. London: HMSO.
- Can animations be safely used in court?
Artificial Intelligence and Law
Volume 9, Issue 4 , pp 271-294
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links