Why The Pessimistic Induction Is A Fallacy
- Peter J. LewisAffiliated withPhilosophy Department, University of Miami
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Putnam and Laudan separately argue that the falsity of past scientific theories gives us reason to doubt the truth of current theories. Their arguments have been highly influential, and have generated a significant literature over the past couple of decades. Most of this literature attempts to defend scientific realism by attacking the historical evidence on which the premises of the relevant argument are based. However, I argue that both Putnam's and Laudan's arguments are fallacious, and hence attacking their premises is unnecessary. The paper concludes with a discussion of the further historical evidence that would be required if the pessimistic induction is to present a serious threat to scientific realism.
- Why The Pessimistic Induction Is A Fallacy
Volume 129, Issue 3 , pp 371-380
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Peter J. Lewis (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Philosophy Department, University of Miami, P.O. Box 248054, Coral Gables, FL, 33124-4670, U.S.A.