Allen, T.F.H. and Hoekstra, T.W. 1991. Role of heterogeneity in scaling of ecological systems under analysis. In Ecological Studies 86: Ecological Heterogeneity. pp. 47–68. Edited by J. Kolasa and S.T.A. Pickett, Springer-Verlag.
Allen, T.F.H. and Starr, T.B. 1982. Hierarchy Perspective for Ecological Complexity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 310 pp.Google Scholar
Amrhein, C. and Reynolds, H. 1996. Using spatial statistics to assess aggregation effects. Geogr. Syst.3: 143–158.Google Scholar
Benson, B.J. and MacKenzie, M.D. 1995. Effects of sensor spatial resolution on landscape structure parameters, Landscape Ecol. 10: 113–120.Google Scholar
Bian, L. and Walsh, S.J. 1993. Scale dependencies of vegetation and topography in a mountainous environment of Montana, The Professional Geographer 45: 1–11.Google Scholar
Bouchard, A. and Domon, G. 1997. The transformation of the natural landscapes of the Haut-Saint-Laurent (Québec) and its implication on future resources management. Landscape Urban Plan. 37: 99–107.Google Scholar
Caldwell, M.M., Matson, P.A., Wessman, C. and Gamon, J. 1993. Prospects for scaling, in Scaling Physiological Processes: Leaf to Globe. pp. 223–230. Academic Press.
Chen. J, Saunders, S.C., Crow, T.R., Naiman, R.J. 1999. Microclimate in forest Ecosystems and Landscape Ecology. Bioscience 49: 288–297.Google Scholar
Coveney, P. and Highfield, R. 1991. The Arrow of Time. Flamingo Press, London, 378 pp.Google Scholar
Cullinan, V.I., Simmons, M.A. and Thomas, J.M. 1997. A bayesian test of hierarchy theory: scaling up variability in plant cover from field to remotely sensed data. Landscape Ecol. 12: 273–285.Google Scholar
Curran, P.J. and Atkinson, P.M. 1998. Geostatistics and Remote Sensing. Progr. Phys. Geogr. 22: 61–78.Google Scholar
DeFries, R.S., Townshend, J.R. and Los, S.O. 1997. Scaling land cover heterogeneity for global atmosphere-biosphere models. pp. 231–246. In Scale in Remote Sensing and GIS, Lewis Publishers.
Dudley, G. 1991. Scale, aggregation, and the modifiable areal unit problem. The Operational Geographer 9: 28–33.Google Scholar
Duggin, M.J. and Robinove, C.J. 1990. Assumptions implicit in remote sensing data acquisition and analysis. Int. J. Remote Sensing 11: 1669–1694.Google Scholar
Ehleringer, J.R and Field, C.B. (Eds), 1993. Scaling Physiological Processes: Leaf to Globe. Academic Press, 388 pp.
Fotheringham, A.S. 1989. Scale-independent spatial analysis. pp. 221–228. In Accuracy of Spatial Databases, Taylor and Francis.
Fotheringham, A.S. and Wong, D.W.S. 1991. The modifiable areal unit problem in multivariate statistical analysis. Environment and Planning A, 23: 1025–1044.Google Scholar
Freidl, M.A. 1997. Examining the Effects of Sensor Resolution and Sub-Pixel Heterogeneity on Spectral Vegetation Indices: Implications for Biophysical Modeling. pp. 113–139. In Scale in Remote Sensing and GIS, Lewis Publishers.
Friedl, M.A., Davis, F.W., Michaelsen, J. and Moritz, M.A. 1995. Scaling and uncertainty in the relationship between the NDVI and land surface biophysical variables: An analysis using a scene simulation model and data from FIFE. Remote Sensing of Environment 54: 233–246.Google Scholar
Gardner, R.H. 1998. Pattern, Process, and the Analysis of Spatial Scales. pp. 17–34. In Ecological Scale Theory and Applications. Columbia University Press.
Gardner, R.H., Cale, W.G. and O'Neill, R.V. 1982. Robust analysis of aggregation error. Ecology 63: 1771–1779.Google Scholar
Hay, G.J., Niemann, K.O. and Goodenough, D.G. 1997. Spatial thresholds, image-objects, and upscaling: A multiscale evaluation. Remote Sensing of Environment 62: 1–19.Google Scholar
Hay, G.J., Niemann, K.O. and McLean, G.F. 1996. An objectspecific image-texture analysis of H-resolution forest imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment 55: 108–122.Google Scholar
Holland, M.M, 1988. SCOPE/MAP technical consultations on landscape boundaries. Biol. Intl. 17: 47–106.Google Scholar
Holling, C.S. 1992. Cross-scale morphology, geometry, and dynamics of ecosystems. Ecol. Monogr. 62: 447–502.Google Scholar
Hunt, L. and Boots, B. 1996. MAUP effects in the principal axis factoring technique, Geogr. Syst. 3: 101–121.Google Scholar
Jarvis, P.G. 1995. Scaling processes and problems. Plant Cell Environ. 18: 1079–1089.Google Scholar
Jelinski, D.E. and Wu, J. 1996. The modifiable areal unit problem and implications for landscape ecology. Landscape Ecol. 11: 29–140.Google Scholar
Jensen, J.R. 1986. Introductory Digital Image Processing, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 379 pp.Google Scholar
Johnston, C.A., Pastor, J. and Pinay, G. 1992. Quantitative Methods for studying Landscape Boundaries. In Landscape Boundaries. Consequences for Biotic Diversity and Ecological flows. pp. 107–125. Springer-Verlag.
Kay, J.J. and Schneider, E.D. 1995. Embracing Complexity: The Challenge of the Ecosystem Approach. pp. 49–59. In
Perspectives on Ecological Integrity, Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
King, A.W. 1999. Hierarchy Theory and the Landscape...Level? Or: Words do Matter. Issues in Landscape Ecology. pp. 6–9. Edited by J. Wiens, M. Moss. International Association for Landscape Ecology. Fifth World Congress. Snowmass Village, Colorado, USA.
King, A.W. 1990. Translating models across scales in the landscape. In Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology, pp. 479–517, Springer-Verlag.
Kirk, O. and Tilney-Basset, R.A.E. 1978. The Chlorophylls. The Plastids. Their Chemistry, structure, growth and inheritance. pp. 64–89. Freeman & Co. LTD.
Levin, S.A., 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73: 1943–1967.Google Scholar
Mandelbrot, B. 1967. The Fractal Geometry of Nature. Science 156: 636–642.Google Scholar
Marceau, D.J. 1999. The scale issue in the social and natural sciences. Can. J. Remote Sensing 25: 347–356.Google Scholar
Marceau, D.J. and Hay, G.J. 1999a. Contributions of remote sensing to the scale issues. Can. J. Remote Sensing 25: 357–366.Google Scholar
Marceau, D.J. and Hay, G.J. 1999b. Scaling and Modelling in Forestry: Applications in Remote Sensing and GIS. Can. J. Remote Sensing 25: 342–346.Google Scholar
Marceau, D.J., 1992. The problem of scale and spatial aggregation in remote sensing: An empirical investigation using forestry data. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Department of Geography, University of Waterloo, 180 pp.
Marceau, D.J., Howarth, P.J. and Gratton, D.J. 1994. Remote sensing and the measurement of geographical entities in a forested environment; Part 1: The scale and spatial aggregation problem. Remote Sensing Environ. 49: 93–104.Google Scholar
Meentemeyer, V. 1989. Geographical perspectives of space, time, and scale. Landscape Ecol. 3: 163–173.Google Scholar
Moellering, H. and Tobler, W. 1972. Geographical variances. Geogr. Analysis 4: 34–64.Google Scholar
Moody, A. and Woodcock, C.E. 1995. The influence of scale and the spatial characteristics of landscapes on land-cover mapping using remote sensing. Landscape Ecol. 10: 363–379.Google Scholar
Nicolis, G. and Prigogine, I. 1989. Exploring Complexity. W.H. Freeman, New York, 313 pp.Google Scholar
O'Neill, R.V. and King, A.W. 1998. Homage to St. Michael; Or, Why are there so many books on Scale? In Ecological Scale Theory and Applications. pp. 3–15. Columbia University Press.
O'Neill, R.V., De Angelis, D.L., Waide, J.B. and Allen, T.F.H. 1986. A hierarchical concept of ecosystems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 262 pp.Google Scholar
O'Neill, R.V., Hunsaker, C.T., Timmins, S.P., Jackson, B.L., Jones, K.B., Ritters, K.H. and Wickham, J.D. 1996. Scale problems in reporting landscape patterns at the regional scale, Landscape Ecol. 11: 169–180.Google Scholar
O'Neill, R.V., Johnson, A. R. and King, A.W. 1989. A hierarchical framework for the analysis of scale. Landscape Ecol. 3: 193–205.Google Scholar
Openshaw, S. 1981. The modifiable areal unit problem. In
Quantitative Geography: A British View. pp. 60–69. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Openshaw, S. 1984. The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem. Concepts and Techniques in Modern Geography (CATMOG) No. 38, 40 pp.
Openshaw, S. and Taylor, P. 1979. A million or so correlation coefficients: three experiments on the modifiable areal unit problem. In Statistical Applications in the Spatial Sciences. pp. 127–144. London Pion.
Pan, D., Domon, G., Marceau, D.J. and Bouchard, A. 2001. Spatial pattern of coniferous and deciduous forest patches in an Eastern North America agricultural landscape: The influence of land-use and physical attributes. Landscape Ecol. 16: 99–110.Google Scholar
Pax-Lenney, M. and Woodcock, C.E. 1997. The effect of spatial resolution on the ability to monitor the status of agricultural lands. Remote Sensing Environ. 61: 210–220.Google Scholar
Slater, P.N. 1980. Remote Sensing: Optics and Optical Systems. Addison-Wesley, 575 pp.
Souriau, M. 1994. Scaling and physical thresholds: The case of continental topography. Int. J. Remote Sensing 15: 2403–2408.Google Scholar
Stewart, J.B., Engman, E.T., Feddes, R.A. and Kerr, Y.H. 1998. Scaling up in hydrology using remote sensing: summary of a Workshop. Int. J. Remote Sensing 19: 181–194.Google Scholar
Townsend, P.A. 2000. A Quantitative Fuzzy Approach to Assess Mapped Vegetation Classifications for Ecological Applications. Remote Sensing of Environ. 72: 253–267.Google Scholar
Treitz, P. and Howarth. P. 2000. High Spatial Resolution Remote Sensing Data for Forest Ecosystem Classification: An Examination of Spatial Scale. Remote Sensing Environ. 72: 268–289.Google Scholar
Turner, S.J., O'Neill, R.V., Conley, W., Conley, M.R. and Humphries, H.C. 1991. Pattern and Scale: Statistics for Landscape Ecology. In Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology. pp. 19–49. Springer Verlag.
Ustin, S.L., Smith, M.O. and Adams, J.B. 1993. Remote sensing of ecological processes: A strategy for developing and testing ecological models using spectral mixture analysis. In Scaling Physiological Processes: Leaf to Globe. pp. 339–357. Academic Press.
Walsh, S.J., Moody, A., Allen, T.R. and Brown, D.G. 1997. Scale dependence of NDVI and its relationship to mountainous terrain. In Scale in Remote Sensing and GIS, Lewis Publishers pp. 27–55.
Wessman, C.A., Aber, J.D. and Peterson, D.L. 1989. An evaluation of imaging spectrometry for estimating forest canopy chemistry. Int. J. Remote Sensing 10: 1293–1316.Google Scholar
Wiens, J.A. 1989. Spatial scaling in ecology. Functional Ecol. 3: 385–397.Google Scholar
Woodcock, C.E. and Strahler, 1987. The factor of scale in remote sensing. Remote Sensing Environ. 21: 311–332.Google Scholar
Wu, J. 1999. Hierarchy and Scaling: Extrapolating Information Along A Scaling Ladder. Can. J. Remote Sensing 25: 367–380.Google Scholar
Wu, J. and Loucks, O.L. 1995. From balance of nature to hierarchical patch dynamics: a paradigm shift in ecology. Quater. Rev. Biol. 70: 439–466.Google Scholar
Wu, J. and Qi, Y. (in press). Dealing with scale in landscape analysis: An overview. Geogr. Inform. Sci., 6: 1–5.
Wu, J., Jelinski, D. E., Luck, M. and Tueller, P.T. (in press). Multiscale Analysis of Landscape Heterogeneity: Scale Variance and Pattern Metrics. Geogr. Inform. Sci., 6: 6–19.