Valuing Health Impacts from Air Pollution in Europe
- Ståle Navrud
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Health impacts make up asignificant portion of the damage costs fromair pollution. In lack of European valuationstudies on morbidity impacts, cost-benefitanalyses, transport and energy externalitystudies, and green accounting exercises inEurope have all used values from more than tenyear old US valuation studies. Results from anew Contingent Valuation study, using animproved version of the survey design of themost transferred US morbidity study, show thatrespiratory symptom days and asthma attacks arevalued lower in Norway than in the US.Correction were made for differences inpurchase power between the two countries, butthe US values are still expressed in 1986dollar values; indicating that the differencebetween the two estimates could be even higher.Thus, the practise of transferring US estimatesand only adjusting the values with the consumerprice index could lead to highly biased valuesin the Norwegian case. The difference betweenthe US and Norwegian values can be explained byimproved CV survey and sample design, differentpreferences in Norway compared to the US, anddifferent public health care systems. We do notknow if we can generalise the results from thisNorwegian study to the rest of Europe, but thestudy clearly illustrates the uncertainty intransferring results from one country toanother.
- Bergland, O., K. Magnussen and S. Navrud (1995), ‘Benefit Transfer: Testing forAccuracy and Reliability. Discussion Paper D-03/95, Department of Economics, Agricultural University of Norway’, Paper presented at the Sixth Annual Conference of The European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists (EAERE),Umea, Sweden, June 17–20. Shorter, revised version forthcoming in Florax, R. J. G. M., P. Nijkamp and K. Willis, eds. (2001), Comparative Environmental Economic Assessment: Meta Analysis and Benefit Transfer. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Cropper, M. L. and A.M. Freeman III (1991), ‘Environmental Health Effects’, Chapter VI in J.B. Braden and C.D. Kolstad, eds., Measuring the Demand for Environmental Quality. Amsterdam/New York: North-Holland.
- Downing, M. and T. Ozuno (1996), ‘Testing the Reliability of the Benefit Function Transfer Approach’,Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics and Management 30(3), 316–322.
- EuropeanCommission DG XII (1995), ExternE Externalities of Energy. Vol. 1: Summary. European Commission, Directorate General (DG) XII — Science Research and Development, Report EUR 16520 EN. Brussels.
- European Commission DG XII (1997), P. Bickl, S. Schmid, W. Krewit and R. Friedrich, eds., ExternalCosts of Transport in ExternE. IER, University of Stuttgart. Final Report, August. Report to the European Commission, Directorate-General XII.
- European Commission DG XII (1999), ExternE Externalities of Energy.Vol. 10: National Implementation, EUR 18528. Luxembourg.
- Gynther, L., T. Otterström, P. Vesaand M. Kosonen (1996), Cost-Efficiency Analysis of Reducing Emissions from the Energy Sector (in Finnish, Abstract in English). Report to the Technology Development Center's SIHTI 2 Programme (Project 126 Y); Ekono Energy Ltd, Espoo, August, 86 pp + appendices
- Halvorsen, B. (1996), ‘Ordering Effects inContingent Valuation Surveys. Willingness to Pay for Reduced Health Damage from Air Pollution’, Environmental and Resource Economics 8(4), 485–499.
- Markandya, A. and M. Pavan, eds. (1999), GreenAccounting in Europe: Four Case Studies. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Mitchell, R. C. and R. Carson (1989), Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent ValuationMethod. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
- NOAA (1993), ‘Report of the NOAA Panel onContingent Valuation’, Federal Register 58, 4601–4614.
- Navrud, S. (1994), ‘Economic Valuationof External Costs of Fuel Cycles. Testing the Benefit Transfer Approach’, in A. T. Almeida et al., eds., Integrated Electricity Resource Planning. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 49–66.
- Ready, R. C., S. Navrud, B. Day, R. Dubourg, F. Machado, S. Mourato, F. Spanninks and M.X. V. Rodriquez (1999), Benefit Transfer in Europe. Are Values Consistent Across Countries? Paper Presented at the EVE Workshop on Benefit Transfer (EU Concerted Action: Environmental Valuation in Europe (EVE), Lillehammer, October. Draft Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Agricultural University of Norway, As, Norway.
- Rosendahl, K. E. (1998), ‘Health Effects and Social Costs of Particulate Pollution — aCase Study for Oslo’, Environmental Modelling and Assessment 3(1–2), 47–61.
- Rozan, A. (1999),Évaluation Contingente des Bénéfices de Santé d'une Amelioration de la Qualité de l'air. L'exemple de la Région Strasbourgeoise (Contingent Valuation of Health Benefits from an Improvement in Air Quality. Case: The Strassbourg Region). Ph.D. Thesis, Louis Pasteur University, Strasbourg, France, 249 pp + appendices (in French).
- Tolley, G., L. Babcock et al. (1986), Valuation of Reductions in Human Health SymptomsandRisks, Report for US EPAgrant no. CR-811053-01-0. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
- Tolley, G., D. Kenkel and R. Fabian, eds. (1994), Valuing Health for Policy. An EconomicApproach. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
- Valuing Health Impacts from Air Pollution in Europe
Environmental and Resource Economics
Volume 20, Issue 4 , pp 305-329
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- air pollution damage
- benefit transfer
- contingent valuation
- health valuation
- Industry Sectors
- Ståle Navrud (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Agricultural University of Norway, P.O. Box 5033, N-1432 Ås, Norway