Instability Of Ex Post Aggregation In The Bolker–Jeffrey Framework And Related Instability Phenomena Article DOI:
10.1023/A:1012933421686 Cite this article as: Risse, M. Erkenntnis (2001) 55: 239. doi:10.1023/A:1012933421686 Abstract
Suppose n Bayesian agents need to make a decision as a group. The groupas a whole is also supposed to be a Bayesian agent whose probabilities andutilities are derived or aggregated in reasonable ways from the probabilitiesand utilities of the group members. The aggregation could be
ex ante, i.e., interms of expected utilities, or it could be ex post, i.e., in terms of utilitiesonly, or in terms of utilities and probabilities separately. This study exploresthe ex post approach. Using the Bolker/Jeffrey framework, we show that ex post aggregation is subject to an instability phenomenon. That is, it mayhappen that the group preference between actions ``flips back and forth'' dependingon the level of detail in which the decision problem is described. Structurally verysimilar phenomena also occur elsewhere in social choice theory, in statistics (Simpson'sParadox), and in voting theory (Ostrogorski's Paradox). REFERENCES
Anscombe, G.: 1976, ‘On Frustration of the Majority by Fulfillment of theMajority'sWill’,
Arrow, K.: 1964, ‘The Role of Securities in theOptimal Allocation of Risk-Bearing’,
Review of Economic Studies 31.
Bickel, P., E. Hammel, and J. O'Connell, ‘Sex Bias in Graduate Admissions: Data from Berkeley’, in W. Fairley and F. Mosteller,
Statistics and Public Policy, Addison-Wesley, Reading.
Blyth, C.: 1972, ‘On Simpson's Paradoxand the Sure-Thing-Principle’,
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Bradley, R.: 1998, ‘A Representation Theorem for a Decision Theory with Conditionals’,
Broome, J.: 1990, ‘Bolker Jeffrey Expected Utility Theory and AxiomaticUtilitarianism’,
Review of Economic Studies, 477–502.
Cartwright, N.: 1979, ‘Causal Laws andEffective Strategies’,
DeGroot M.: 1989,
Probability and Statistics,Addison-Wesley, Reading.
Hammond, P.: 1982, ‘Ex-ante and Ex-post Welfare Optimality underUncertainty’,
Hammond, P.: 1983, ‘Ex-post Optimality as aDynamically Consistent Objective for Collective Choice under Uncertainty’, in: P. Pattanaik an M. Salles (eds),
Social Choice and Welfare, North Holland, Amsterdam.
Hild, M.: forthcoming, ‘The Instability ofEx Post Aggregation’.
Hild, M., R. Jeffrey, and M. Risse: forthcoming, ‘Preference AggregationAfter Harsanyi’, forthcoming in M. Salles and J. Weymark,
Justice, Political Liberalism, and Utilitarianism: Proceedings of the Caen Conference in Honor of John Harsanyi and John Rawls, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hylland, A. and R. Zeckhauser: 1979, ‘The Impossibility of Bayesian GroupDecision Making with Separate Aggregation of Beliefs and Values’,
Jeffrey, R.: 1983,
The Logic of Decision
, 2nd edition, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Joyce, J.: 1999,
Foundations of Causal Decision Theory
, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Levi, I.: 1990, ‘Pareto Unanimity and Consensus’,
Journal of Philosophy
Malinas, G.:1997, ‘Simpson's Paradox and the Wayward Researcher’,
Australasian Journal of Philosophy
Mittal, Y.: 1991, ‘Homogeneity of Subpopulations and Simpson's Paradox’,
Journal ofthe American Statistical Association
Mongin, P.: 1995, ‘Consistent BayesianAggregation’,
Journal of Economic Theory
Nermuth, M.: 1991, ‘Two-StageDiscrete Aggregation: the Ostrogorski Paradox and Related Phenomena’,
Social Choice and Welfare
Ordeshook, P.: 1986,
Game Theory and Political Theory
, Cambridge UniversityPress, Chicago.
Saari, D.: 1987, ‘The Source of Some Paradoxes from Social Choice and Probability’,
Journal of Economic Studies
Savage, L.: 1954,
The Foundations of Statistics
,Wiley, New York.
Tanguiane, A.: 1994, ‘Arrow's Paradox and Mathematical Theory ofDemocracy’,
Social Choice and Welfare
van Fraassen, B.: 1989,
, Clarendon, Oxford.
Vaupel, J. and A. Yashin: 1985, ‘Heterogeneity's Ruses: SomeSurprising Effects of Selection on Population Dynamics’,
The American Statistician
Wagner, C.: 1982, ‘Simpson's Paradox in Real Life’,
The American Statistical Association
Wagner, C.: 1983, ‘Anscombe's Paradox and the Rule of Three-Fourths’,
Warner, F.: 1970,
Foundations of Differentiable Manifolds and LieGroups, Scott, Foresman, Glenview.
Young, P. and M. Balinski: 1994,
,Yale University Press, New Haven.
Google Scholar Copyright information
© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001