Abstract
Forest gap models have a long history in the study of forest dynamics, including predicting long-term succession patterns and assessing the potential impacts of climate change and air pollution on forest structure and composition. In most applications, existing models are adapted for the specific question at hand and little effort is devoted to evaluating alternative formulations for key processes, although this has the potential to significantly influence model behavior. In the present study, we explore the implications of alternative formulations for selected ecological processes via the comparison of several gap models. Baseline predictions of forest biomass, composition and size structure generated by several gap models are compared to each other and to measured data at boreal and temperate sites in North America. The models ForClim and LINKAGES v2.0 were compared based on simulations of a temperate forest site in Tennessee, whereas FORSKA-2V, BOREALIS and ForClim were compared at four boreal forest sites in central and eastern Canada. Results for present-day conditions were evaluated on their success in predicting forest cover, species composition, total biomass and stand density, and allocation of biomass among species. In addition, the sensitivity of each model to climatic changes was investigated using a suite of six climate change scenarios involving temperature and precipitation. In the temperate forest simulations, both ForClim and LINKAGES v2.0 predicted mixed mesophytic forests dominated by oak species, which is expected for this region of Tennessee. The models differed in their predictions of species composition as well as with respect to the simulated rates of succession. Simulated forest dynamics under the changed climates were qualitatively similar between the two models, although aboveground biomass and species composition in ForClim was more sensitive to drought than in LINKAGES v2.0. Under a warmer climate, the modeled effects of temperature on tree growth in LINKAGES v2.0 led to the unrealistic loss of several key species. In the boreal forest simulations, ForClim predicted significant forest growth at only the most mesic site, and failed to predict a realistic species composition. In contrast, FORSKA-2V and BOREALIS were successful in simulating forest cover, general species composition, and biomass at most sites. In the climate change scenarios, ForClim was highly sensitive, whereas the other two models exhibited sensitivity only at the drier central Canadian sites. Although the studied sites differ strongly with respect to both the climatic regime and the set of dominating species, a unifying feature emerged from these simulation exercises. The major differences in model behavior were brought about by differences in the internal representations of the seasonal water balance, and they point to an important limitation in some gap model formulations for assessing climate change impacts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aber, J. D. and Melillo, J. M.: 1982, ‘FORTNITE: A Computer Model of Organic Matter and Nitrogen Dynamics in Forest Ecosystems’, Univ. Wisconsin Res. Bull. R3130.
Badeck, F.-W., Lischke, H., Bugmann, H., Hickler, T., Hönninger, K., Lasch, P., Lexer, M. J., Mouillot, F., Schaber, J., and Smith, B.: 2001, ‘Tree Species Composition in European Pristine Forests: Comparison of Stand Data to Model Predictions’, Clim. Change 51, 307–347.
Bergeron, Y.: 2000, ‘Species and Stand Dynamics in the Mixed Woods of Quebec's Southern Boreal Forest’, Ecology 81, 1500–1516.
Bergeron, Y. and Charron, D.: 1994, ‘Postfire Stand Dynamics in the Southern Boreal Forest (Québec): A Dendroecological Approach’, Ecoscience 1, 173–184.
Bergeron, Y. and Dubuc, M.: 1989, ‘Succession in the Southern Part of the Canadian Boreal Forest’, Vegetatio 79, 51–63.
Bergeron, Y. and Leduc, A.: 1997, ‘Relationships between Change in Fire Frequency and Spruce Budworm Outbreak Severity in the South-Eastern Canadian Boreal Forest’, Journal of Vegetation Science 9, 493–500.
Bergeron, Y., Morin, H., Leduc, A., and Joyal, C.: 1995, ‘Balsam Fir Mortality Following the Last Spruce Budworm Outbreak in North Western Quebec’, Can. J. Forest Res. 25, 1375–1384.
Bormann, F. H. and Likens, G. E.: 1979, Pattern and Process in a Forested Ecosystem, Springer, New York, p. 253.
Botkin, D. B., Janak, J. F., and Wallis, J. R.: 1972, ‘Some Ecological Consequences of a Computer Model of Forest Growth’, J. Ecol. 60, 849–872.
Botkin, D. B., Janak, J. F., and Wallis, J. R.: 1973, ‘Estimating the Effects of Carbon Fertilization on Forest Composition by Ecosystem Simulation’, in Woodwell, G. M. and Pecan, E. V. (eds.), Carbon and the Biosphere, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington D.C., pp. 328–344.
Bugmann, H.: 1994, On the Ecology of Mountainous Forests in a Changing Climate: A Simulation Study, Ph.D. Thesis No. 10638, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, p. 258.
Bugmann, H.: 1996, ‘A Simplified Forest Model to Study Species Composition along Climate Gradients’, Ecology 77, 2055–2074.
Bugmann, H.: 1997a, ‘Gap Models, Forest Dynamics and the Response of Vegetation to Climate Change’, in Huntley, B., Cramer, W., Morgan, A. V., Prentice, H. C. and Allen, J. R. M. (eds.), Past and Future Rapid Environmental Changes: The Spatial and Evolutionary Responses of Terrestrial Biota, Springer, Berlin a.o., pp. 441–453.
Bugmann, H.: 1997b, ‘Sensitivity of Forests in the European Alps to Future Climatic Change’, Clim. Res. 8, 35–44.
Bugmann, H.: 2001a, ‘A Review of Forest Gap Models’, Clim. Change 51, 259–305.
Bugmann, H.: 2001b, ‘A Comparative Analysis of Forest Dynamics in the Swiss Alps and the Colorado Front Range’, For. Ecol. Manage. 145, 43–55.
Bugmann, H. and Martin, P.: 1995, ‘How Physics and Biology Matter in Forest Gap Models’, Clim. Change 29, 251–257.
Bugmann, H. K. M. and Solomon, A. M.: 1995, ‘The Use of a European Forest Model in North America: A Study of Ecosystem Response to Climate Gradients’, J. Biogeogr. 22, 477–484.
Bugmann, H. and Cramer, W.: 1998, ‘Improving the Behaviour of Forest Gap Models along Drought Gradients’, For. Ecol. Manage. 103, 247–263.
Bugmann, H. K. M. and Solomon, A. M.: 2000, ‘Explaining Forest Biomass and Species Composition across Multiple Biogeographical Regions’, Ecol. Appl. 10, 95–114.
Bugmann, H. K. M., Yan Xiaodong, Sykes, M. T., Martin, Ph., Lindner, M., Desanker, P. V., and Cumming, S. G.: 1996, ‘A Comparison of Forest Gap Models: Model Structure and Behaviour’, Clim. Change 34, 289–313.
Clark, D. F.: 2001, The BOREALIS Gap Model, in prep.
Curlin, J. W. and Nelson, D. J.: 1968, Walker Branch Watershed Project: Observations, Facilities, and Ecological Characteristics, ORNL/TM 2271, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, p. 100.
Dale, V. H. and Franklin, J. F.: 1989, ‘Potential Effects of Climate Change on Stand Development in the Pacific Northwest’, Can. J. Forest Res. 19, 1581–1590.
De Grandpré, L., Gagnon, D., and Bergeron, Y.: 1993, ‘Changes in the Understory of Canadian Southern Boreal Forest after Fire’, Journal of Vegetation Science 4, 803–810.
Environment Canada: 1961–1990, Canadian Climate Program. Canadian climate normals Environment Canada, Atmospheric Environment Service. Downsview, Ontario.
Gauthier, S., Bergeron, Y., and Simon, J.-P.: 1996a, ‘Effects of Different Fire Regimes on the Serotiny Level of Jack Pine at the Southern Edge of the Boreal Forest’, J. Ecol. 84, 539–548.
Gauthier, S., Leduc, A., and Bergeron, Y.: 1996b, ‘Forest Dynamics Modelling under a Natural Fire Cycle: A Tool to Define Natural Mosaic Diversity in Forest Management’, Env. Monit. Assess. 39, 417–434.
Halliwell, D. H. and Apps, M. J.: 1997a, BOREAS Biometry and Auxiliary Sites: Locations and Descriptions, Nat. Resour. Can., Can. For. Serv., North. For. Cent., Edmonton, Alberta, p. 120.
Halliwell, D. H. and Apps, M. J.: 1997b, BOREAS Biometry and Auxiliary Sites: Overstory and Understory Data, Nat. Resour. Can., Can. For. Serv., North. For. Cent., Edmonton, Alberta, p. 254.
Hanson, P. J., Todd, D. E., Huston, M. A., Joslin, J. D., Croker, J. L., and Augé, R. M.: 1998, Description and Field Performance of the Walker Branch Throughfall Displacement Experiment, ORNL/TM-13586, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, p. 36.
Hogg, E. H.: 1994, ‘Climate and the Southern Limit of the Western Canadian Boreal Forest’, Can. J. Forest Res. 24, 1835–1845.
Hogg, E. H. and Hurdle, P. A.: 1995, ‘The Aspen Parkland in Western Canada: A Dry-Climate Analogue for the Future Boreal Forest?’, Water Air Soil Pollut. 82, 391–400.
Johnson, D. W. and Van Hook, R. I.: 1989, Analysis of Biogeochemical Cycling Processes in Walker Branch Watershed, Springer-Verlag, New York, p. 401.
Kattenberg, A., Giorgi, F., Grassl, H., Meehl, G. A., Mitchell, J. F. B., Stouffer, R. J., Tokioka, T., Weaver, A. J., and Wigley, T. M. L.: 1996, ‘Climate Models – Projections of Future Climate’, in Houghton, J. T., Meira Filho, L. G., Callander, B. A., Harris, N., Kattenberg, A., and Maskell, K. (eds.), Climate Change 1995 – The Science of Climate Change, Contribution of Working Group I to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 285–357.
Keane, R. E., Morgan, P., and Running, S.W.: 1996, ‘FIRE-BGC – AMechanistic Ecological Process Model for Simulating Fire Succession on Coniferous Forest Landscapes of the Northern Rocky Mountains’, USDA Forest Service Research Paper INT-RP-484, p. 122.
Kercher, J. R. and Axelrod, M. C.: 1984, ‘Analysis of SILVA: A Model for Forecasting the Effects of SO2 Pollution and Fire on Western Coniferous Forests’, Ecol. Modelling 23, 165–184.
Kneeshaw, D. D. and Bergeron, Y.: 1996, ‘Ecological Factors Affecting the Abundance of Advance Regeneration in Quebec's South Western Boreal Forest’, Can. J. Forest Res. 26, 888–898.
Kneeshaw, D. D. and Bergeron, Y.: 1998, ‘Canopy Gap Characteristics and Tree Replacement in the South-Eastern Boreal Forest’, Ecology 79, 783–794.
Kneeshaw, D. D., Bergeron, Y., and De Grandpré, L.: 1998, ‘Early Response of Abies Balsamea Seedlings to Artificially Created Openings’, Journal of Vegetation Science 9, 543–550.
Küchler, A.W.: 1975, ‘Potential Natural Vegetation of the Conterminous United States 1:3′168′000’. Amer. Geogr. Soc. Spec. Publ. No. 36.
Lafon, C. W., Huston, M. A., and Horn, S. P.: 2000, ‘Effects of Agricultural Soil Loss on Forest Succession Rates and Tree Diversity in East Tennessee’, Oikos 90, 431–444.
Lindner, M., Bugmann, H., Lasch, P., Flechsig, M., and Cramer, W.: 1997, ‘Regional Impacts of Climatic Change on Forests in the State of Brandenburg, Germany’, Agric. For. Meteteorol. 84, 123–135.
Morin, H.: 1994, ‘Dynamics of Balsam Fir Forests in Relation to Spruce Budworm Outbreaks in the Boreal Zone, Québec’, Can. J. Forest Res. 24, 730–741.
Morin, H., Laprise, D., and Bergeron, Y.: 1993, ‘Chronology of Spruce Budworm Outbreaks near Lake Duparquet, Abitibi Region, Quebec’, Can. J. Forest Res. 23, 1497–1506.
Norby, R. J., Ogle, K., Curtis, P. S., Badeck, F.-W., Huth, A., Hurtt, G. C., Kohyama, T., and Peñuelas, J.: 2001, ‘Aboveground Growth and Competition in Forest Gap Models: An Analysis for Studies of Climatic Change’, Clim. Change 51, 415–447.
Pacala, S. W., Canham, C. D., and Silander, J. A. Jr.: 1993, ‘Forest Models Defined by Field Measurements: I. The Design of a Northeastern Forest Simulator’, Can. J. Forest Res. 23, 1980–1988.
Pacala, S. W., Canham, C. D., Saponara, J., Silander, J. A., Kobe, R. K., and Ribbens, E.: 1996, ‘Forest Models Defined by Field Measurements: Estimation, Error Analysis and Dynamics’, Ecol. Monogr. 66, 1–43.
Paré, D. and Bergeron, Y: 1995, ‘Above-Ground Biomass Accumulation along a 230-Year Chronosequence in the Southern Portion of the Canadian Boreal Forest’, J. Ecol. 83, 1001–1007.
Pastor, J. and Post, W. M.: 1985, Development of a Linked Forest Productivity-Soil Process Model, ORNL/TM-9519. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.
Pastor, J. and Post, W. M.: 1988, ‘Response of Northern Forests to CO2-Induced Climate Change’, Nature 334, 55–58.
Prentice, I. C., Sykes, M. T., and Cramer, W.: 1993, ‘A Simulation Model for the Transient Effects of Climate Change on Forest Landscapes’, Ecol. Modelling 65, 51–70.
Price, D. T, and Apps, M. J.: 1995, ‘The Boreal Forest Transect Case Study: Global Change Effects on Ecosystem Processes and Carbon Dynamics in Canada’, Water Air Soil Pollut. 82, 203–214.
Price, D. T. and Apps, M. J.: 1996, ‘Boreal Forest Responses to Climate-Change Scenarios along an Ecoclimatic Transect in Central Canada’, Clim. Change 34, 179–190.
Price, D. T., Halliwell, D. H., Apps, M. J., and Peng, C.: 1999a, ‘Adapting a Patch Model to Simulate the Sensitivity of Central-Canadian Boreal Ecosystems to Climate Variability’, J. Biogeogr. 26, 1101–1113.
Price, D. T., Peng, C, Apps M. J., and Halliwell, D. H.: 1999b, ‘Simulating Effects of Climate Change on Boreal Ecosystem Carbon Pools in Central Canada’, J. Biogeogr. 26, 1237–1248.
Price, D. T., Zimmermann, N. E., van der Meer, P. J., Lexer, M. J., Leadley, P., Jorritsma, I. T. M., Schaber, J., Clark, D. F., Lasch, P., McNulty, S., Wu, J., and Smith, B.: 2001, ‘Regeneration in Gap Models: Priority Issues for Studying Forest Responses to Global Change’, Clim. Change 51, 475–508.
Priestley, C. H. B. and Taylor, R. J.: 1972, ‘On the Assessment of Surface Heat Flux and Evaporation Using Large-Scale Parameters’, Mon. Wea. Rev. 100, 81–92.
Reynolds, J. F. and Acock, B. (eds.): 1997, ‘Modularity and Genericness in Plant and Ecosystem Models’, Ecol. Modelling 94, 7–16.
Rowe, J. S.: 1972, Forest Regions of Canada, Department of the Environment, Canadian Forestry Service Publication No. 1300, p. 172.
Sellers, P., Hall, F., Margolis, H., Kelly, B., Baldocchi, D., den Hartog, G., Cihlar, J., Ryan, M. G., Goodison, B., Crill, P., Ranson, K. J., Lettenmaier, D., and Wickland, D. E.: 1995, ‘The Boreal Ecosystem – Atmosphere Study (BOREAS):An Overview and Early Results from the 1994 Field Year’, Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 76, 1549–1577.
Shao, G., Bugmann, H., and Yan, X.: 2001, ‘A Comparative Analysis of the Structure and Behavior of Three Gap Models at Sites in Northeastern China’, Clim. Change 51, 389–413.
Shugart, H. H.: 1984, A Theory of Forest Dynamics, Springer, New York.
Shugart, H. H. and West, D. C.: 1977, ‘Development of an Appalachian Deciduous Forest Simulation Model and its Application to Assessment of the Impact of the Chestnut Blight’, J. Environ. Manage. 5, 161–179.
Shugart, H. H. and Emanuel, W. R.: 1985, ‘Carbon Dioxide Increase: The Implications at the Ecosystem Level’, Plant Cell Environ. 8, 381–386.
Shugart, H. H. and McLaughlin, S. B.: 1985, ‘Modeling SO2 Effects on Forest Growth and Community Dynamics’, in Winner, W. E., Mooney, H. A., and Goldstein, R. A. (eds.), Sulfur Dioxide and Vegetation: Physiology, Ecology and Policy Issues, Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford CA, pp. 478–491.
Shuttleworth, W. J. and Wallace, J. S.: 1985, ‘Evaporation from Sparse Crops – An Energy Combination Theory’, Quart. J. R. Met. Soc. 111, 839–855.
Solomon, A. M.: 1986, ‘Transient Response of Forests to CO2-Induced Climate Change: Simulation Modeling Experiments in Eastern North America’, Oecologia 68, 567–579.
Sykes, M. T. and Prentice, I. C.: 1995, ‘Boreal Forest Futures – Modeling the Controls on Tree Species Range Limits and Transient Responses to Climate Change’, Water Air Soil Pollut. 82, 415–428.
Sykes, M. T. and Prentice, I. C.: 1996, ‘Climate Change, Tree Species Distribtuions and Forest Dynamics: A Case Study in the Mixed Conifer Northern Hardwoods Zone of Northern Europe’. Clim. Change 34, 161–177.
Talkkari, A., Kellomaki, S., and Peltola, H.: 1999, ‘Bridging a Gap between a Gap Model and a Physiological Model for Calculating the Effect of Temperature on Forest Growth under Boreal Conditions’, For. Ecol. Manage. 119, 137–150.
Thornthwaite, C. W. and Mather, J. R.: 1957, ‘Instructions and Tables for Computing Potential Evapotranspiration and the Water Balance’, Publ. Climatol. 10, 183–311.
Urban, D. L., Harmon, M. E., and Halpern, Ch. B.: 1993, ‘Potential Response of Pacific Northwestern Forests to Climatic Change, Effects of Stand Age and Initial Composition’, Clim. Change 23, 247–266.
Weishampel, J. F., Urban, D. L., Shugart, H. H., and Smith, J. B. Jr.: 1992, ‘Semivariograms from a Forest Transect Gap Model Compared with Remotely Sensed Data’, J. Veg. Sci. 3, 521–526.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bugmann, H.K.M., Wullschleger, S.D., Price, D.T. et al. Comparing the Performance of Forest gap Models in North America. Climatic Change 51, 349–388 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012537914881
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012537914881