The Advantages of Theft over Toil: The Design Inference and Arguing from Ignorance
- Cite this article as:
- Wilkins, J.S. & Elsberry, W.R. Biology & Philosophy (2001) 16: 709. doi:10.1023/A:1012282323054
- 83 Downloads
Intelligent design theorist William Dembski hasproposed an ``explanatory filter'' fordistinguishing between events due to chance,lawful regularity or design. We show that ifDembski's filter were adopted as a scientificheuristic, some classical developments inscience would not be rational, and thatDembski's assertion that the filter reliablyidentifies rarefied design requires ignoringthe state of background knowledge. Ifbackground information changes even slightly,the filter's conclusion will vary wildly.Dembski fails to overcome Hume's objections toarguments from design.