Theory and Decision

, Volume 51, Issue 1, pp 1–11

Are Referees Sufficiently Informed About The Editor'S Practice?

Authors

  • Ruth Ben-Yashar
    • Department of EconomicsBar-Ilan University
  • Shmuel Nitzan
    • Department of EconomicsBar-Ilan University
Article

DOI: 10.1023/A:1012273830440

Cite this article as:
Ben-Yashar, R. & Nitzan, S. Theory and Decision (2001) 51: 1. doi:10.1023/A:1012273830440

Abstract

This paper clarifies why editors of academic journals should share with their referees the information about the number of referees they consult and the decision rule they apply. Our analysis also rationalizes the common questionable phenomenon of editors who seem to distort the yes or no recommendations of their referees. The editors request a recommendation of whether to accept or reject the paper as well as an assessment of the paper. The editors need the complete reports to make the appropriate correction of the referees' final recommendations.

RefereesEditorsDecision-making systemInformation sharingEndogenous acceptance criteria

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001