Biology and Philosophy

, Volume 16, Issue 5, pp 683–707

Reply to My Critics: A Response to Reviews of Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution

Authors

  • Michael J. Behe
    • Department of Biological SciencesLehigh University
Article

DOI: 10.1023/A:1012268700496

Cite this article as:
Behe, M.J. Biology & Philosophy (2001) 16: 683. doi:10.1023/A:1012268700496

Abstract

In Darwin's Black Box: The BiochemicalChallenge to Evolution I argued thatpurposeful intelligent design, rather thanDarwinian natural selection, better explainssome aspects of the complexity that modernscience has discovered at the molecularfoundation of life. In the five years since itspublication the book has been widely discussedand has received considerable criticism. Here Irespond to what I deem to be the mostfundamental objections. In the first part ofthe article I address empirical criticismsbased on experimental studies alleging eitherthat biochemical systems I discussed are notirreducibly complex or that similar systemshave been demonstrated to be able to evolve byDarwinian processes. In the remainder of thearticle I address methodological concerns,including whether a claim of intelligent designis falsifiable and whether intelligent designis a permissible scientific conclusion.

Darwinismevolutionfalsifiabilityintelligent designirreducible complexitynatural selection
Download to read the full article text

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001