Gender Differences and Similarities in Dominance Hierarchies in Same-Gender Groups Based on Speaking Time
- Marianne Schmid Mast
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
This study aimed at investigating whether all-women and all-men groups differed in their hierarchical organization and stability of their rank orders across time. One hundred and sixteen European, middle-class, noncollege women and men (average age: 38) participated in small-group discussions twice within a week with the same group members. Speaking time served as the behavioral dominance indicator on which group hierarchies were based. Additionally, group members rank ordered each other on dominance after each interaction. In the first session, all-men groups were more hierarchically structured than all-women groups. During each session, all-women and all-men groups showed a similar significant increase in hierarchical structuring. For both women and men, rank orders remained stable during interactions and from the first to the second session. Results are discussed in terms of three theoretical models describing dominance hierarchies.
- Adams, K. A., & Landers, A. D. (1978). Sex differences in dominance behavior. Sex Roles, 4, 215–223.
- Aries, E. J. (1976). Interaction patterns and themes of male, female and mixed groups. Small Group Behavior, 7, 7–18.
- Aries, E. J., Gold, C., & Weigel, R. H. (1983). Dispositional and situational influences on dominance behavior in small groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 779–786.
- Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence. Chicago: Rand McNally.
- Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley.
- Bales, R. F., Strodtbeck, F. L., Mills, T. M., & Roseborough, M. E. (1951). Channels of communication in small groups. American Sociological Review, 16, 461–468.
- Berger, J., Fisek, M. H., Norman, R. Z., & Zelditch, M. (1977). Status characteristics and social interaction: An expectation states approach. New York: Elsevier.
- Bischof-Köhler, D. (1990). Frau und Karriere in psychobiologischer Sicht [Woman and career in a psychobiological view]. Zeitschrift für Arbeits-und Organisationspsychologie, 34, 17–28.
- Bischof-Köhler, D. (1992). Geschlechtstypische Besonderheiten im Konkurrenzverhalten: Evolutionäre Grundlagen und entwicklungspsychologische Fakten [Gender-typical peculiarities in competitive behavior: Evolutionary basis and developmental-psychological facts]. In G. Krell & M. Osterloh (Eds.), Personalpolitik aus der Sicht von Frauen.Was kann die Personalforschung von der Frauenforschung lernen? (pp. 251–281). München: Rainer Hampp Verlag.
- Carlson Jones, D. (1984). Dominance and affiliation as factors in the social organization of same-gender groups of elementary school children. Ethology and Sociobiology, 5, 193–202.
- Cashdan, E. (1995). Hormones, sex, and status in women. Hormones and Behavior, 29, 354–366.
- Cashdan, E. (1998). Are men more competitive than women? British Journal of Social Psychology, 37,213–229.
- Charlesworth, W. R., & Dzur, C. (1987). Gender comparisons of preschoolers' behavior and resource utilization in group problem solving. Child Development, 58, 191–200.
- Eagly, A. H., & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 233–256.
- Eagly, A. H., Karau, S. J., Miner, J. B., & Johnson, B. T. (1994). Gender and motivation to manage in hierarchic organizations: A meta-analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 5, 135–159.
- Ellyson, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (1985). Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior: Basic concepts and issues. In S. L. Ellyson & J. F. Dovidio (Eds.), Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior (pp. 1–27). New York: Springer.
- Gifford, R. (1991). Mapping nonverbal behavior on the interpersonal circle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 279–288.
- Ginter, G., & Lindskold, S. (1975). Rate of participation and expertise as factors influencing leader choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 1085–1089.
- Golub, S., & Maxwell Canty, E. (1982). Sex-role expectations and the assumption of leadership by college women. Journal of Social Psychology, 116, 83–90.
- Hegstrom, J. L., & Griffith, W. I. (1992). Dominance, sex, and leader emergence. Sex Roles, 27, 209–220.
- Johnson, C., Clay-Warner, J., & Funk, S. J. (1996). Effects of authority structures and gender on interaction in same-gender task groups. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 221–236.
- Kalma, A. (1991). Hierarchisation and dominance assessment at first glance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 165–181.
- Kimble, C. E., & Musgrove, J. I. (1988). Dominance in arguing mixed-sex dyads: Visual dominance patterns, talking time, and speech loudness. Journal of Research in Personality, 22, 1–16.
- King, W. C., Miles, E. W., & Kniska, J. (1991). Boys will be boys (and girls will be girls): The attribution of gender role stereotypes in a gaming situation. Sex Roles, 25, 607–623.
- Knight, G. P., & Chao, C. (1989). Gender differences in the cooperative, competitive, and individualistic social values of children. Motivation and Emotion, 13, 125–141.
- Lamb, T. A. (1980). Paralanguage hierarchies in dyads and triads: Talking first and talking the most. Social Behavior and Personality, 8, 221–224.
- Mazur, A. (1985). A biosocial model of status in face-to-face primate groups. Social Forces, 64, 377–402.
- Megargee, E. I. (1969). Influence of sex roles on the manifestation of leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 377–382.
- Megargee, E. I., Bogart, P., & Anderson, B. J. (1966). Prediction of leadership in a simulated industrial task. Journal of Applied Psychology, 50, 292–295.
- Moskowitz, D. S., Suh, E. J., & Desaulniers, J. (1994). Situational influences on gender differences in agency and communion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 751–761.
- Mosteller, F. M., & Bush, R. R. (1954). Selected quantitative techniques. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology: Vol. 1. Theory and method (pp. 289–334). Cambridge: Addison-Wesley.
- Mullen, B., Salas, E., & Driskell, J. E. (1989). Salience, motivation, and artifact as contributions to the relation between participation rate and leadership. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 545–559.
- Parker, R., & Omark, D. R. (1980). The social ecology of toughness. In D. R. Omark, F. F. Strayer, & D. G. Freedman (Eds.), Dominance relations: An ethological view of human conflict and social interaction (pp. 415–426). New York: Garland.
- Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable relevant to social roles and intergroup relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763.
- Pratto, F., Stallworth, L. M., & Sidanius, J. (1997). The gender gap: Differences in political attitudes and social dominance orientation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 49–68.
- Ridgeway, C. L., & Berger, J. (1986). Expectations, legitimation, and dominance behavior in task groups. American Sociological Review, 51, 603–617.
- Ridgeway, C. L., & Diekema, D. (1989). Dominance and collective hierarchy formation in male and female task groups. American Sociological Review, 54, 79–93.
- Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research (Vol. 6). Newbury Park: Sage.
- Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1982). Comparing effect sizes of independent studies. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 500–504.
- Ruback, R. B., Dabbs, J. M., & Hopper, C.H. (1984). The process of brainstorming: An analysis of individual and group vocal parameters. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 558–567.
- Savin-Williams, R. C. (1979). Dominance hierarchies in groups of early adolescents. Child Development, 50, 923–935.
- Schjelderup-Ebbe, T. (1922). Soziale Verhältnisse bei Vögeln [Social relationshipsamongbirds]. Zeitschrift f ¨ur Psychologie, 90, 106–107.
- Schmid Mast, M. (2001). Dominance expressed in speaking time and inferred dominance based on speaking time: A meta-analysis. Manuscript submitted for publication.
- Schmid Mast, M. (in press). Female dominance hierarchies: Are they any different from males'? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
- Stein, R. T., & Heller, T. (1979). An empirical analysis of the correlations between leadership status and participation rates reported in the literature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1993–2002.
- Tannen, D. (1990). You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: Ballantine.
- Troemel-Ploetz, S. (1994). “Let me put it this way, John:” Conversational strategies of women in leadership positions. Journal of Pragmatics, 22, 199–209.
- Walters, A. E., Stuhlmacher, A. F., & Meyer, L. L. (1998). Gender and negotiator competitiveness: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76, 1–29.
- Wiggins, J. S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 395–412.
- Gender Differences and Similarities in Dominance Hierarchies in Same-Gender Groups Based on Speaking Time
Volume 44, Issue 9-10 , pp 537-556
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Northeastern University, Boston;