Argument Structure and Disciplinary Perspective
- James B. Freeman
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Many in the informal logic tradition distinguish convergent from linked argument structure. The pragma-dialectical tradition distinguishes multiple from co-ordinatively compound argumentation. Although these two distinctions may appear to coincide, constituting only a terminological difference, we argue that they are distinct, indeed expressing different disciplinary perspectives on argumentation. From a logical point of view, where the primary evaluative issue concerns sufficient strength of support, the unit of analysis is the individual argument, the particular premises put forward to support a given conclusion. Structure is internal to this unit. From a dialectical point of view, where the focus concerns how well a critical discussion comes to a reasoned conclusion of some disputed question, the argumentation need not constitute a single unit of argument. The unit of dialectical analysis will be the entire argumentation made up of these several arguments. The multiple/co-ordinatively compound distinction is dialectical, while the linked/convergent distinction is logical. Keeping these two pairs of distinctions separate allows us to see certain attempts to characterize convergent versus linked arguments as rather characterizing multiple versus co-ordinatively compound arguments, in particular attempts of Thomas, Nolt, and Yanal, and to resolve straightforwardly conflicts, tensions, or anomalies in their accounts. Walton's preferred Suspension/Insufficient Proof test to identify linked argument structure correctly identifies co-ordinatively compound structure. His objection to using the concept of relevance to explicate the distinction between linked and convergent structure within co-ordinatively compound argumentation can be met through explicating relevance in terms of inference licenses. His counterexample to the Suspension/No Support test for identifying linked structure which this approach supports can itself be straightforwardly dealt with when the test is explicated through inference licenses.
- Copi, Irving M. and Carl Cohen: 1990, Introduction to Logic, 8th edition, Macmillan Publishing Company, New York.
- Eemeren, Frans H. van and Rob Grootendorst: 1984, Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions, Foris Publications, Dordrecht-Holland/Cinnaminson-USA.
- Eemeren, Frans H. van and Rob Grootendorst: 1992, Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Hillsdale, NJ.
- Freeman, James B.: 1991, Dialectics and the Macrostructure of Arguments: A Theory of Argument Structure, Foris Publications, Berlin-Germany/New York-USA.
- Freeman, James B.: 1992, 'Relevance, Warrants, Backing, Inductive Support', Argumentation 6, 219–235.
- Govier, Trudy: 1985, A Practical Study of Argument, Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, CA.
- Nolt, J. E.: 1984, Informal Logic: Possible Worlds and Imagination, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.
- Pinto, Robert C.: 1994, 'Review of A.F. Snoeck Henkemans, Analysing Complex Argumentation', Argumentation 8, 314–318.
- Snoeck Henkemans, A. F.: 1992, Analysing Complex Argumentation, SICSAT, Amsterdam.
- Thomas, Stephen N.: 1986, Practical Reasoning in Natural Language 3e, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
- Toulmin, Stephen: 1958, The Uses of Argument, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- Walton, Douglas: 1996, Argument Structure: A Pragmatic Theory, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
- Yanal, Robert J.: 1991, 'Dependent and Independent Reasons', Informal Logic 13, 137–144.
- Argument Structure and Disciplinary Perspective
Volume 15, Issue 4 , pp 397-423
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Linked, convergent argument structure
- multiple, co-ordinatively compound argumentation
- logical, dialectical analysis
- inference rule
- Industry Sectors
- James B. Freeman (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Philosophy, Hunter College of The City University of New York, 695 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10021, USA