The Future of the European “Social Model” in the Global Economy
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
This article examines the prospects for European welfare states in the context of globalization. It begins with a critical review of the globalization arguments. While there is some evidence that external constraints make life harder for policymakers seeking positive-sum outcomes, it is the combination of national debt and spending limits, plus domestic tax resistance, that really count in making expenditure-based social and employment policies more difficult in certain countries. In understanding the constraints and opportunities that will shape Europe's welfare future, globalization—crudely understood—is therefore much less influential than many suppose. While EMU has radically diminished national autonomy in exchange rate, monetary policy, and fiscal policy, there are also beneficial consequences for social policy and broader economic management. On the employment and social policy side, initiatives required to match greater “flexibility” with sustained security are now at the top of the EU agenda, and mechanisms for diffusing best practice across Europe are being put in place. Within this framework, European welfare states must place more emphasis on “dynamic equality,” being primarily attentive to the worst off, more hospitable to incentive-generating differentiation, and actively vigilant with regard to the “openness” of opportunity structures.
- Andrews, D.M. (1994). “Capital Mobility and State Autonomy.” International Studies Quarterly 38, 193–218.
- Barnard, C. (2000). “Social Dumping and the Race to the Bottom: Some Lessons for the European Union from Delaware?” European Law Review 25, 57–78.
- Barrell, R. and V. Genre. (1999). “Employment Strategies for Europe: Lessons from Denmark and the Netherlands.” National Institute Economic Review, April, 82–95.
- Burtless G. (1995). “International Trade and the Rise in Earnings Inequality.” Journal Of Economic Literature 33, 800–816.
- Clayton, R. and J. Pontusson. (1997). “Welfare State Retrenchment and Public Sector Restructuring in Advanced Capitalist Societies.” Paper Presented at the annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C., August, 28–31.
- Crouch, C., D. Finegold, and A. Hemerijck. (1999). “The Skill Predicament in the Open Economy.” Mimeo, Robert Schuman Centre, European University Institute, Florence.
- Daly, M. (2000). “A Fine Balance:Women's Labor Market Participation in International Comparison.” In F.W. Scharpf and V. Schmidt (eds.), Work and Welfare in the Open Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Vol. II, pp. 467–510.
- Esping-Andersen, G. (1996). “Welfare States without Work: The Impasse of Labour Shedding and Familialism in Continental European Social Policy.” In G. Esping-Andersen (ed.), Welfare States in Transition: National Adaptations in Global Economies. London: Sage Publications, pp. 66–87.
- Ferrera, M. and E. Gualmini. (1999). Salvati dall' Europa? Bologna: Mulino.
- Ferrera, M., A. Hemerijk, and M. Rhodes. (2000a). The Future of Social Europe: Recasting Work and Welfare in the New Economy. Lisbon: CELTA/Ministério do Trabalhoe da Solidarie dade.
- Ferrera, M., A. Hemerijk, and M. Rhodes. (2000b). “Recasting European Welfare States for the 21st Century.” European Review (special issue on the Welfare State, edited by Stefan Leibfried). Summer, pp. 427–446.
- Freeman, C. and L. Soete. (1994). Work for All or Mass Unemployment? Computerised Technical Change into the 21st Century. London, New York: Pinter.
- Freeman, R.B. (1995). “Are Your Wages Set in Beijing?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 9(3), 15–32.
- Ganghof, S. and P. Genschel. (1999). “National Tax Policy under International Constraints.” Paper Presented at the Conference on “Globalization, European Economic Integration and Social Protection,” European University Institute, Florence, March, 11–12.
- Garrett, G. (1998). Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Garrett, G. (2000). “Capital Mobility, Exchange Rates and Fiscal Policy in the Global Economy.” Review of International Political Economy 7(1), 153–170.
- Gern, K.-J. (1998). Recent Developments in Old-Age Pension Systems-an International Overview. Kiel: Kieler Institut für Weltwirtschaft.
- Hemerijck, A. and M. Schludi. (2000). “Sequences of Policy Failures and Effective Policy Responses.” In F.W. Scharpf and V. Schmidt (eds.),Work andWelfare in the Open Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Vol. 1, pp. 125–126.
- Iversen, T. and A. Wren. (1998). “Equality, Employment and Budgetary Restraint: The Trilemma of the Service Economy.” World Politics 50(4), 507–546.
- Kuhnle, S. (2000). “The Scandinavian Welfare State in the 1990s: Challenged but Viable.” West European Politics 23(2), 210–229, (special issue on “Recasting European Welfare States,” edited by M. Ferrera and M. Rhodes).
- Lindley, R.M. (1999). “Knowledge-Based Economies: The European Employment Debate in a New Context.” Background paper for the Portuguese Presidency of the European Union, December.
- Manow, P. and E. Seils. (2000). “The Employment Crisis of the German Welfare State.” West European Politics 23(2), 137–160 (special issue on “Recasting European Welfare States,” edited by M. Ferrera and M. Rhodes).
- Mundell, R. (1962). “The Appropriate Use of Monetary and Fiscal Policy under Fixed Exchange Rates.” IMF Staff Papers 9, 70–77.
- Notermans, T. (2000a). Money, Markets and the State: Social Democratic Economic Policies Since 1918. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Notermans, T. (2000b). “Can Social Democracy Survive under a Single Currency?” In George Ross and Andrew Martin (eds.), EMU and the European Model of Society. Forthcoming.
- OECD. (1994). OECD's Job Study. Paris: OECD.
- OECD. (1999). Employment Outlook, June. Paris: OECD.
- Pierson, P. (1998). “Irresistible Forces, Immovable Objects: Post-Industrial Welfare States Confront Permanent Austerity.” Journal of European Public Policy 5(4), 539–560.
- Rhodes, M. (1998). “Globalisation, Labour Markets and Welfare States: A Future of ‘Competitive Corporatism’?” In M. Rhodes and Y. Mény (eds.), The Future of European Welfare: A New Social Contract? London: Macmillan, pp. 178–203.
- Rhodes, M. (2000). “Desperately Seeking a Solution: Social Democracy, Thatcherism and the ‘Third Way’ in British Welfare.” West European Politics 23(2), 161–187 (special issue on “Recasting European Welfare States,” edited by M. Ferrera and M. Rhodes).
- Rhodes, M. (2001). “The Political Economy of Social Pacts: ‘Competitive Corporatism’ and European Welfare Reform.” In P. Pierson (ed.), The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 165–194.
- Rieger, E. and S. Leibfried. (1998). “Welfare State Limits to Globalization.” Politics and Society 26(3), 363–390.
- Rodrik, D. (1996). Why Do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments? National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No. 5537.
- Ruggie, J.G. (1982). “International Regimes, Transactions and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order.” International Organization 36(2), 379–415.
- Ruigrok, W. and R. Van Tulder. (1995). The Logic of International Restructuring. London: Routledge.
- Scharpf, F.W. (1997). “Employment and the Welfare State: A Continental Dilemma.” MPIfG Working Paper 97/7, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies (MPIfG), Cologne.
- Scharpf, F.W. and V. Schmidt. (2000). “Conclusions.” In F.W. Scharpf and V. Schmidt (eds.), Work and Welfare in the Open Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Vol. 1, pp. 310–336.
- Slaughter, M.J. and P. Swagel. (1997). “The Effect of Globalization on Wages in the Advanced Economies.” Working Paper of the International Monetary Fund WP/97/43.
- Snower, D.J. (1997). “Challenges to Social Cohesion and Approaches to Policy Reform.” In OECD, Societal Cohesion and the Globalising Economy: What Does the Future Hold? Paris: OECD, pp. 39–60.
- Soete, L. (1999). “The Challenges and the Potential of the Knowledge-Based Economy in a Globalised World.” Background paper for the Portuguese Presidency of the European Union: “Action Line-Employment, Economic Reforms and Social Cohesion-for a Europe of Innovation and Knowledge.”
- Streeck, W. (1992). Social Institutions and Economic Performance: Studies of Industrial Relations in Advanced Industrial Economies, Newbury Park, CA.: Sage.
- Swank, D. (1992). “Politics and the Structural Dependence of the State in Democratic Capitalist Nations.” American Political Science Review, 86(1), 38–54.
- Swank, D. (1998). “Funding the Welfare State: Global Taxation of Business in Advanced Market Economies.” Political Studies 46, 671–692.
- Swank, D. (2000). Diminished Democracy? Global Capital, Political Institutions, and Policy Change in Developed Welfare States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Forthcoming.
- Visser, J. and A. Hemerijck. (1997). “A Dutch Miracle:” Job Growth,Welfare Reform and Corporatism in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
- Wachtel, H.M. (2000). “Tobin and other Global Taxes.” Review of International Political Economy 7(2), 335–352.
- Webb, M.C. (1991). “International Economic Structures, Government Interests and International Coordination of Macroeconomic Adjustment Policies.” International Organization 45(3), 309–338.
- Weiss, L. (1997). “The Myth of the Powerless State.” New Left Review, September-October, 3–27.
- Wood, A. (1994). North-South Trade, Employment and Inequality: Changing Fortunes in a Skill-Driven World. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- The Future of the European “Social Model” in the Global Economy
Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis
Volume 3, Issue 2 , pp 163-190
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- welfare state
- social protection
- public policy
- labour markets