Health Care Analysis

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 187–211

The Ethics of Aggregation and Hormone Replacement Therapy

Authors

    • The Bioethics Institute, Johns Hopkins University and The Kennedy Institute of EthicsGeorgetown University
  • Evan R. Myers
    • Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyDuke University
  • Ruth R. Faden
    • The Bioethics Institute, Johns Hopkins University and The Kennedy Institute of EthicsGeorgetown University
Article

DOI: 10.1023/A:1011386320609

Cite this article as:
Lyerly, A.D., Myers, E.R. & Faden, R.R. Health Care Analysis (2001) 9: 187. doi:10.1023/A:1011386320609

Abstract

The use of aggregated quality of life estimatesin the formation of public policy and practiceguidelines raises concerns about the moralrelevance of variability in values inpreferences for health care. This variabilitymay reflect unique and deeply held beliefs thatmay be lost when averaged with the preferencesof other individuals. Feminist moral theorieswhich argue for attention to context andparticularity underline the importance ofascertaining the extent to which differences inpreferences for health states revealinformation which is morally relevant toclinicians and policymakers. To facilitatethese considerations, we present an empiricalstudy of preferences for the timing andoccurrence of health states associated withhormone replacement therapy (HRT). Sixteenwomen between the ages of 45 and 55 wereenrolled in this pilot study. Theirpreferences regarding five health statesassociated with HRT (menopausal symptoms, sideeffects of HRT, breast cancer, myocardialinfarction, and osteoporosis) were assessed inquantitative terms known as utilities. Twostandard methods, the visual analog scale (VAS) and the standard gamble (SG), were used toassess utility and time preference (calculatedas a discount rate). The wide variability ofresponses underlines the importance oftailoring health care to individual women'spreferences. Policy guidelines whichincorporate utility analysis must recognize thenormative limitations of aggregatedpreferences, and the moral relevance ofindividual conceptions of health.

cost-effective analysisdecision analysisdistributive justicefeminist theoryhormone replacement therapymenopausepatient preferencestime preferenceutilitywomen
Download to read the full article text

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001