Minds and Machines

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 77-93

First online:

The Status and Future of the Turing Test

  • James H. MoorAffiliated withDepartment of Philosophy, Dartmouth College

Rent the article at a discount

Rent now

* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.

Get Access


The standard interpretation of the imitation game is defended over the rival gender interpretation though it is noted that Turing himself proposed several variations of his imitation game. The Turing test is then justified as an inductive test not as an operational definition as commonly suggested. Turing's famous prediction about his test being passed at the 70% level is disconfirmed by the results of the Loebner 2000 contest and the absence of any serious Turing test competitors from AI on the horizon. But, reports of the death of the Turing test and AI are premature. AI continues to flourish and the test continues to play an important philosophical role in AI. Intelligence attribution, methodological, and visionary arguments are given in defense of a continuing role for the Turing test. With regard to Turing's predictions one is disconfirmed, one is confirmed, but another is still outstanding.

imitation game Loebner prize Turing test