Neophobia and Dietary Conservatism:Two Distinct Processes?
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Birds show distinct hesitation when approaching novel food and this has been termed ‘neophobia’. In laboratory-held birds like domestic chicks this effect lasts for a matter of a few minutes at most, but hesitant attack of novel foods can last for weeks or even months in wild birds. This effect, called ‘dietary conservatism’, seems to be a different type of learning process from neophobia as first described and has hitherto been largely overlooked. This paper presents some evidence for the view that the processes may be fundamentally different. We outline results from laboratory chicks that show neophobia to be easily deactivated by experience, which renders it unlikely to be an important force in wild birds. We also report evidence that the process of incorporation of novel food into the diet is not a simple one-stage process but includes at least four steps of assessment. The paper concludes with an outline of the importance of dietary conservatism in our understanding of the evolution of aposematism and the workings of mimicry.
- Barnett, S.A. (1958) Experiments on 'neophobia’ in wild and laboratory rats. Brit. J. Psychol. 49, 195-201.
- Brigham, A.J. and Sibley, R.M. (1999) A review of the phenomenon of neophobia. In D.P. Cowand and C.J. Feare (eds) Advances in Vertebrate Pest Management. Filander Verlag, Furth, pp. 67-84.
- Bryan Jones, R. (1986) Responses of domestic chicks to novel food as a function of sex, strain and previous experience. Behav. Processes 12, 261-271. CrossRef
- Bryan Jones, R. and Andrew, R.J. (1992) Responses of adult domestic cocks and capons to novel stimuli and alarming stimuli. Behav. Processes 26, 189-200. CrossRef
- Doherty, S. and Cowie, R.J. (1994) The effects of early feeding experience on long term seed choice by canaries (Serinus canaria). Ethology 97, 177-189. CrossRef
- Galef, B.G. (1993) Functions of social learning about food: a causal analysis of effects of diet novelty on preference transmission. Anim. Behav. 46, 257-265. CrossRef
- Gittleman, J.L., Harvey, P.H. and Greenwood, P.J. (1980) The evolution of conspicuous coloration: some experiments in bad taste. Anim. Behav. 28, 897-899. CrossRef
- Guilford, T. (1985) Is kin selection involved in the evolution of warning coloration? Oikos 45, 31-35.
- Guilford, T. (1988) The evolution of conspicuous coloration. Am. Nat. 131, S7-S21. CrossRef
- Honey, R.C. (1990) Stimulus generalisation as a function of stimulus novelty and familiarity in rats. J.E.P. Anim. Behav. Proc. 16, 178-184. CrossRef
- Marples, N.M. and Brakefield, P.M. (1995) Genetic variation for the rate of recruitment of novel insect prey into the diet of a bird. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 55, 17-27. CrossRef
- Marples, N.M. and Roper, T.J. (1996) Effects of novel colour and smell on the response of naive chicks towards food and water. Anim. Behav. 51, 1417-1424. CrossRef
- Marples, N.M., Roper, T.J. and Harper D.G.C. (1998) Responses of wild birds to novel prey: evidence of dietary conservatism. Oikos 83, 161-165.
- Murphy, L.B. (1977) Responses of domestic fowl to novel food and objects. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 3, 335-349. CrossRef
- Roper, T.J. (1993) Effects of novelty on taste avoidance learning in chicks. Behaviour 125, 265-281.
- Schlenoff, D.H. (1984) Novelty: a basis for generalization in prey selection. Anim. Behav. 32, 919-921. CrossRef
- Shettleworth, S.J. (1972) The role of novelty in learned avoidance of unpalatable prey by domestic chicks (Gallus gallus). Anim. Behav. 20, 29-35. CrossRef
- Turner, J.R., Kearney, E.P. and Exton, L.S. (1984) Mimicry and the Monte Carlo predator: the palatability spectrum and the origins of mimicry. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 23, 247-268.
- Neophobia and Dietary Conservatism:Two Distinct Processes?
Volume 13, Issue 7-8 , pp 641-653
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- avian predation
- food novelty
- Industry Sectors