Trusting and Joining? An Empirical Test of the Reciprocal Nature of Social Capital
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
This article tests a key hypothesis of the social capital literature: voluntary memberships and generalized trust reproduce one another. Panel data from the Michigan Socialization Studies from 1965 to 1982 are used to test the contemporaneous and lagged effects of interpersonal trust on joining groups and the contemporaneous and lagged effects of joining groups on interpersonal trust. We find no evidence supporting the hypothesis that interpersonal trust encourages group memberships and only limited evidence suggesting that belonging to groups makes individuals more trusting.
Supplementary Material (0)
- Achen, C. H. (2000, July 20–22). Why lagged dependent variables can suppress the explanatory power ofother independent variables. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Political Methodology Section of the APSA, Los Angeles.
- Almond, G. A., and Verba, S. (1989). The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations ([New ]. ed.). Newbury Park, CA.: Sage Publications.
- Altemeyer, B. (1996). The Authoritarian Specter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Alvarez, M., and Glasgow, G. (2000). Two-stage estimation of non-recursive choice models. Political Analysis 8: 147–166.
- Amemiya, T. (1978). The estimation of a simultaneous equation generalized probit model. Econometrica, 46: 1193–1205.
- Axelrod, R. (1984). The Evolution ofCooperation. New York: Basic Books.
- Brehm, J., and Rahn, W. (1997). Individual level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science, 41: 999–1023.
- Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital and the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94: S95–S120.
- Eckstein, H. (1975). Case study and theory in political science. In F. I. Greenstein and N. W. Polsby (eds.), Handbook ofPolitical Science, pp. 79–137. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
- Edwards, B., and Foley, M. W. (1998). Civil society and social capital beyond Putnam. The American Behavioral Scientist, 42: 124–139.
- Finkel, S. E. (1995). Causal Analysis with Panel Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Gerbner, G., and Gross, L. (1976). Living with television: the violence profile. Journal of Communication, 26: 173–201.
- Jennings, M. K., Markus, G. B., and Neimi, R. G. (1991). Youth-parent socialization panel study, 1965–1982: Three waves combined. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies/Survey Research Center [producers], 1983. Ann Arbor: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].
- Jennings, M. K., and Neimi, R. G. (1981). Generations and Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Marcus, G., Sullivan, J. L., Theiss-Morse, E., and Wood, S. L. (1995). With Malice Toward Some: How People Make Civil Liberties Judgments. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Markus, G. B. (1979). Analyzing Panel Data. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
- Mutz, D. C., and Martin, P. S. (1998). Exposure to conflicting views: causes and consequences. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA.
- Mutz, D. C., and Mondak, J. J. (1998). What's so great about league bowling? Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
- Nelson, F., and Olsen, L. (1978). Specification and estimation of a simultaneous-equation model with limited dependent variables. International Economic Review, 19: 695–709.
- Norris, P. (1996). Does television erode social capital? A reply to Putnam. PS: Political Science and Politics 29: 474–80.
- Putnam, R. (1993). Making Democracy Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Putnam, R. (1995). Tuning in, tuning out: the strange disappearance of social capital in America. PS: Politics & Society 28: 664–683.
- Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival ofAmerican Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
- Rahn, W., Brehm, J., and Carlson, N. (1999). National elections as institutions for generating social capital. In T. Skocpol & M. Fiorina (eds.), Civic Engagement in American Democracy, pp. 111–160. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
- Rivers, D., and Vuong, Q. H. (1988). Limited information estimators and exogeneity tests for simultaneous probit models. Journal ofEconometrics 39: 347–366.
- Schudson, M. (1996). What if civic life didn't die? The American Prospect 25: 17.
- Schwartz, N., and Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of wellbeing: informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology 45: 513–23.
- Stolle, D., and Rochon, T. R. (1998). Are all associations alike? The American Behavioral Scientist 42: 47–65.
- Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., and Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
About this Article
- Trusting and Joining? An Empirical Test of the Reciprocal Nature of Social Capital
Volume 22, Issue 4 , pp 267-291
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
- Additional Links
- social capital
- voluntary associations
- interpersonal trust