Plant and Soil

, Volume 233, Issue 1, pp 127–143

Analysis of water- and nitrogen-use efficiency of wheat in a Mediterranean climate


  • S. Asseng
    • CSIRO Plant Industry
  • N. C. Turner
    • CSIRO Plant Industry
  • B. A. Keating
    • APSRU/CSIRO, Sustainable Ecosystems, Long Pocket Laboratories

DOI: 10.1023/A:1010381602223

Cite this article as:
Asseng, S., Turner, N.C. & Keating, B.A. Plant and Soil (2001) 233: 127. doi:10.1023/A:1010381602223


Water-use efficiency (WUE [g grain yield m−2 mm−1 ET]) and nitrogen-use efficiency (NUE [Δ g grain yield g−1 Napplied]) are important measures that can affect the productivity of crops in different environmental systems. However, measurement and interpretation of WUE and NUE in the field are often hampered by the high degree of complexity of these systems due to season-to-season variability in rainfall, the variation in crop responses to soil types and to agronomic management. To be able to guide agronomic practice, experimentally-derived measurements of WUE and NUE need to be extrapolated across time and space through appropriate modelling. To illustrate this approach, the Agricultural Production Systems Simulator (APSIM), which has been rigorously tested for wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in a Mediterranean environment, was used to estimate and analyse the WUE and NUE of wheat crops in the Mediterranean-climatic region of the central Western Australian agricultural zone. The APSIM model was run for three locations (average annual rainfall of 461 mm [high rainfall zone], 386 mm [medium] and 310 mm [low]) and two soil types that had contrasting plant-available water-holding capacities in the rooting zone (sand: 55 mm, clay soil: 109 mm). Simulations were carried out with historical weather records (82–87 years) assuming current crop management and cultivars. The modelling analyses highlighted the inherently high degree of seasonal variability in yield, WUE and NUE of wheat, depending on soil type, N fertiliser input, rainfall amount and, in particular, rainfall distribution. The clay soil tended to be more productive in terms of grain yield, WUE and NUE in the high and medium rainfall zones, but less productive in most years in the low rainfall zone. The sandy soil was less productive in the high rainfall zone due to the high nitrate leaching potential of this soil type, but more productive than the clay in the low rainfall zone due to poorer pre-anthesis growth and less water use, less water loss by soil evaporation and relatively more water use in the post-anthesis phase. When a wheat crop was sown early on clay soil in the low rainfall zone, it yielded as high as in the other rainfall zones in seasons when rainfall was above average or there was a good store of water in the soil prior to sowing. The simulations confirmed findings from a limited number of field experiments and extended these findings both qualitatively and quantitatively across soil types, rainfall regions and crop management options. Furthermore, by using long-term historical weather records, the simulations extended the findings across the wide range of climatic scenarios experienced in mediterranean-climatic regions.

APSIMevapotranspirationgrain yieldharvest indexprobabilitywater use

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001