A Qualitative Analysis of the Transition from Theory to Practice in Undergraduate Training in a PBL-Medical School
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
In spite of numerous curricular innovations, the problems medical students encounter in making the transition from theoretical training to clinical training remain unresolved and the problem has received scant attention in the literature. We performed a qualitative study to explore students' perceptions and attitudes regarding this transition in undergraduate medical training. Twenty fifth-year students of the Maastricht Medical School participated in focus group discussions about the transition from the preclinical phase to the clinical phase of the curriculum. All focus group discussions were videotaped, literally transcribed and qualitatively analysed using content analysis. The results suggest that students have difficulty in bridging the gap between the theoretical and clinical phase of the curriculum. The problems they experience arise largely from professional socialisation processes. However, students also find it difficult to apply theoretical knowledge in clinical practice. Students find contacts with real patients highly motivating. In the clinical phase their learning changes from passive acquisition of knowledge to more active learning.
Since the problem-based learning approach is supposed to enhance application of basic science concepts to clinical problems, it is surprising that students experience difficulties in applying their knowledge in practice. To facilitate the transition from theory to practice in the Maastricht Medical School some curricular changes could be introduced, such as early patient contacts to motivate students and help them learn usable knowledge. Furthermore, the advantages of a problem-based preclinical curriculum to student learning should be fully exploited. Finally, the assessment system must be congruent with the educational programme, because examinations have a powerful effect on student learning.
- Boshuizen, H.P.A. (1996). The Shock of Practice: Effects on Clinical Reasoning. Paper presented at the The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, 8–14 April 1996.
- Boshuizen, H.P.A. & Schmidt, H.G. (1992). On the role of biomedical knowledge in clinical reasoning by experts, intermediates and novices. Cognitive Science 16(2): 153–184. CrossRef
- Briggs Style, C., Maxwell, J.A. & Moore, G.T. (1990). The effects of early patient contact: the student's perspective. Academic Medicine 65(9 Suppl): S33–S34. CrossRef
- Busari, J.O., Scherpbier, A.J.J.A. & Boshuizen, H.P.A. (1997). Comparative study of medical education as perceived by students at three Dutch universities. Advances in Health Science Education 1(2): 141–151. CrossRef
- Clack, G.B. (1994). Medical graduates evaluate the effectiveness of their education. Medical Education 28(5): 418–431.
- General Medical Council (1993). Tomorrow's Doctors. London: GMC.
- Foley, R.P., Polson, A.L. & Vance, J.M. (1997). Review of the literature on PBL in the clinical setting. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 9(1): 4–9. CrossRef
- Hendershott, A. & Wright, S. (1993). Student focus groups and curriculum review. Teaching Sociology 21: 154–159. CrossRef
- Hill, J., Rolfe, I.E., Pearson, S.A. & Heathcote, A. (1998). Do junior doctors feel they are prepared for hospital practice? A study of graduates from traditional and non-traditional medical schools. Medical Education 32(1): 19–24. CrossRef
- Morgan, D.L. (1988). Focus Groups as Qualitative Research, Vol. 16. Newbury Park, London, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
- Muller, S. (1984). Physicians for the twenty-first century/report of the project panel on the general professional education of the physician and college preparation for medicine. Journal of Medical Education 59(11 Part 2): 1–208.
- Mutha, S., Takayama, J.I. & O'Neil, E.H. (1997). Insights into medical students’ career choices based on third-and fourth-year students’ focus-group discussions. Academic Medicine 72(7): 635–640. CrossRef
- Newble, D.I. & Jaeger, K. (1983). The effect of assessments and examinations on the learning of medical students. Medical Education 17(3): 165–171.
- Norman, G.R. & Schmidt, H.G. (1992). The psychological basis of problem-based learning: A review of the evidence. Academic Medicine 67(9): 557–565. CrossRef
- Roche, A.M., Sanson Fisher, R.W. & Cockburn, J. (1997). Training experiences immediately after medical school. Medical Education 31(1): 9–16. CrossRef
- Scherpbier, A.J.J.A. (1997). De Kwaliteit van Vaardigheidsonderwijs Gemeten. Dissertation, Universiteit Maastricht, Maastricht.
- Schmidt, H.G., Dauphinee, W.D. & Patel, V.L. (1987). Comparing the effects of problem-based and conventional curricula in an international sample. Journal of Medical Education 62(4): 305–315.
- Van Dalen, J., Zuidweg, J. & Collet, J. (1989). The curriculum of communication skills teaching at Maastricht medical school. Medical Education 23(1): 55–61.
- Van de Wiel, M.W.J., Schaper, N.C., Scherpbier, A.J.J.A., Van der Vleuten, C.P.M. & Boshuizen, H.P.A. (1999). Students’ experiences with real patient tutorials in a problem-based curriculum. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 11(1): 12–20. CrossRef
- Walton, H.J. & Matthews, M.B. (1989). Essentials of problem-based learning. Medical Education 23(6): 542–558.
- Woodward, C.A. & Ferrier, B.M. (1983). The content of the medical curriculum at McMaster University: Graduates’ evaluation of their preparation for postgraduate training. Medical Education 17(1): 54–60.
- A Qualitative Analysis of the Transition from Theory to Practice in Undergraduate Training in a PBL-Medical School
Advances in Health Sciences Education
Volume 5, Issue 2 , pp 105-116
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- clerkships focus group
- medical education
- preclinical training
- problem-based learning
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Skillslab, University of Maastricht, The Netherlands
- 3. Department of Educational Research and Development, University of Maastricht, The Netherlands