Information on within-field variability from sequences of yield maps: multivariate classification as a first step of interpretation Authors
Cite this article as: Lark, R. & Stafford, J. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems (1998) 50: 277. doi:10.1023/A:1009756731788 Abstract
It is shown that automated pattern recognition applied to a series of yield maps can be used to divide a field into regions within which yields show similar between-season variation. These regions are associated with particular soil types. Such a regionalisation may be a useful way of recognising important within-field scales of variability, and may be a useful first step in interpretation to develop a management response.
soil variability crop performance References
Bezdek JC Ehrlich R and Full W (1984) FCM: The fuzzy c–Means clustering algorithm.
Computers and Geosciences, 10: 191–203.
Burrough PA (1989) Fuzzy mathematical methods for soil survey and land evaluation.
Journal of Soil Science, 40: 477–492.
Finke PA and Goense D (1993) Differences in barley grain yields as a result of soil variability.
Journal of Agricultural Science, 120: 171–180.
Kachanoski RG and Fairchild GL (1996) Field scale fertiliser recommendations: the spatial scaling problem.
Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 76: 1–6.
Mercer WB and Hall AD (1911) The experimental error of field trials.
Journal of Agricultural Science, 4: 107–132.
McBratney AB and Moore AW(1985) Application of fuzzy sets to climatic classification.
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 35: 165–185.
McBratney AB, De Gruiter JJ and Brus DJ (1992) Spacial prediction and mapping of continuous soil classes.
Geoderma, 54: 39–64.
Minitab reference manual, Release 6. Minitab Inc., Philadelphia.
Stafford JV, Ambler B, Lark RM and Catt J (1996) Mapping and interpreting the yield variation in cereal crops.
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 14: 101–119 Copyright information
© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998