Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Light verbs and the syntax of aspect in Yiddish

  • Published:
The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The stem construction in Yiddish is a type of light verb construction in which a light verb (heading an LVP) takes an Asp(ect)P complement, which in turn takes a VP complement (cf. Travis 1992). The AspP is headed by an aspectual operator, yielding a “diminutivized event” interpretation. A puzzling fact about the stem construction is that the verbal elements seem to reflect an OV order, while Yiddish is in other respects a VO language. This OV-like ordering is a consequence of incorporation. A second, more restricted, type of light verb construction in Yiddish is also discussed, in which the thematic element is an indefinite NP complement. Here there is no AspP; the light verb takes a VP complement which is headed by a null verb which itself takes the predicate nominal as its complement. In both constructions, the light verb semantically selects for a complement which denotes some sort of diminutivized event; the differing distribution of the verbal and nominal forms of the light verb construction results from semantic differences between the Asp operator and the indefinite determiner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aronson, Howard I.: 1985, ‘On Aspect in Yiddish’, General Linguistics25, 171–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Mark: 1988, Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Mark: 1996, The Polysynthesis Parameter, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Mark, Kyle Johnson and Ian Roberts: 1989, ‘Passive Arguments Raised’, Linguistic Inquiry20.2, 219–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobaljik, Jonathan David: 1994, ‘What Does Adjacency Do?’, in Heidi Harley and Colin Phillips (eds.), The Morphology-Syntax Connection, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics Volume 22, Cambridge, MA, pp. 1–22.

  • Bowers, John: 1993, ‘The Syntax of Predication’, Linguistic Inquiry24, 591–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, Michael: 1993, ‘Θ-Theory and Arguments’, Linguistic Inquiry24, 1-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butt, Miriam: 1995, The Structure of Complex Predicates in Urdu, CSLI Publications, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Richard Gordon: 1989, The Grammatical Structure of Verbal Predicates, Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.

  • Cattell, R.: 1984, Composite Predicates in English, Academic Press, Orlando, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, Eun: 1997, ‘Light Verb Construction, TrP, and Multiple Feature Checking Theory’, unpublished manuscript, Cornell University and MIT.

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1993, ‘A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory’, in Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The View From Building 20, Cambridge, MIT Press, pp. 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1995, The Minimalist Program, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Chris: 1997, Local Economy, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Chris and Höskuldur Thráinsson: 1996, ‘VP-Internal Structure and Object Shift in Icelandic’, Linguistic Inquiry27.3, 391–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comrie, Bernard: 1976, Aspect, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diesing, Molly: 1992, Indefinites, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diesing, Molly: 1997a, ‘Yiddish VP Order and the Typology of Object Movement in Germanic’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory15.2, 369–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diesing, Molly: 1997b, ‘Complex Predicates and Aspect’, talk presented at the Conference on Cross-Linguistic Variation in Semantics, Cornell University, July 26–27, 1997.

  • Diesing, Molly and Eloise Jelinek: 1995, ‘Distributing Arguments,’ Natural Language Semantics3.2, 123–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everaert, Martin and Bart Hollebrandse: 1995, ‘The Lexical Representation of Light Verb Constructions’, talk given at the 21stMeeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley, CA.

  • Fox, Danny: 1995, ‘Economy and Scope,’ Natural Language Semantics3.3, 283–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, Elaine: 1994, ‘Head-Adjunction and Movement: Evidence from Yiddish’, unpublished manuscript, University of Toronto.

  • Grimshaw, Jane and Armin Mester: 1988, ‘Light Verbs and Theta-Marking’, Linguistic Inquiry19, 205–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haider, Hubert: 1993, Deutsche Syntax, generativ, Gunter Narr Verlag, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, Kenneth and Samuel Jay Keyser: 1993, ‘On Argument Structure and the Lexical Expression of Syntactic Relations’, in Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The View From Building 20, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 53–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Irene and Angelika Kratzer: in press, Semantics in Generative Grammar, Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge.

  • Higginbotham, James: 1985, ‘On Semantics’, Linguistic Inquiry16, 547–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höhle, Tilman: 1991, ‘Projektionsstufen bei V-Projektionen,’ unpublished manuscript, University of Tübingen.

  • Hook, Peter E.: 1974, The Compound Verb in Hindi, The Center for South and Southeast Asian Studies, The University of Michigan.

  • Hollebrandse, Bart: 1993, ‘Dutch Light Verb Constructions’, unpublished M.A. thesis, Tilburg University, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C.-T. James: 1992, ‘Complex Predicates in Control,’ in Richard K. Larson et al. (eds.), Control and Grammar, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 119-147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, Ray S.: 1974, ‘A Deep Structure Projection Rule’, Linguistic Inquiry6, 53–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Kyle: 1991, ‘Object Positions’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory9, 577–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Dovid: 1987, Grammar of the Yiddish Language, Duckworth, London.

  • Kayne, Richard: 1985, ‘Principles of Particle Constructions’, in Jacqueline Gueron, H.-G. Obenauer and Jean Yves Pollock (eds.), Grammatical Representations. Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 101–140.

  • Kayne, Richard: 1994, The Antisymmetry of Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearns, Kate: 1989, ‘Predicate Nominals in Complex Predicates’, in Itziar Laka and Anoop Mahajan (eds.), Functional Heads and Clause Structure, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Volume 10, Cambridge, pp. 123–134.

  • Koopman, Hilda: 1994, ‘Licensing Heads’, in David Lightfoot and Norbert Hornstein (eds.), Verb Movement, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 261–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, Hilda: 1995, ‘On Verbs That Fail to Undergo V-Second’, Linguistic Inquiry26.1, 137–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, Angelika: 1994, ‘The Event Argument and the Semantics of Voice’, unpublished manuscript, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

  • Kratzer, Angelika: 1995, ‘Stage and Individual Level Predicates’, in Gregory N. Carlson and Francis Jeffry Pelletier (eds.), The Generic Book, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 125–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, Angelika: 1996a, ‘Severing the External Argument from its Verb’, in Johan Rooryk and Laurie Zaring (eds.), Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 109–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, Angelika: 1996b, The Semantics of Inflectional Heads, 1996 Girona Lectures.

  • Larson, Richard: 1988, ‘On the Double Object Construction’, Linguistic Inquiry19, 335–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasnik, Howard: 1993, ‘Lectures on Minimalist Syntax’, unpublished manuscript, University of Connecticut.

  • Levin, Beth and Malka Rappoport Hovav: 1995, Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Yafei: 1996, ‘X°-Binding and Verb Incorporation’, Linguistic Inquiry21.3, 399–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto, Yo: 1996, ‘A Syntactic Account of Light Verb Phenomena’, Journal of East Asian Linguistics5, 107–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neeleman, Ad: 1994, Complex Predicates, OTS dissertation series, Utrecht University.

  • Neeleman, Ad: 1997, ‘PP-Complements’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory15, 89–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neeleman, Ad and Fred Weerman: 1993, ‘The Balance Between Syntax and Morphology: Dutch Particles and Resultatives’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory11, 433–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishiyama, Kunio: 1996a, ‘Spelling Out Voice: The s/rAlternation in Japanese’, unpublished manuscript, Cornell University.

  • Nishiyama, Kunio: 1996b, ‘The Role of Transitivity Phrase in Grammar’, unpublished manuscript, Cornell University.

  • Pesetsky, David: 1989, ‘Language-Particular Processes and the Earliness Principle’, unpublished manuscript, MIT.

  • Pesetsky, David: 1995, Zero Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, Jean-Yves: 1989, ‘Verb Movement, Universal Grammar, and the Structure of IP’, Linguistic Inquiry20, 365–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramchand, Gillian: 1991, ‘Complex Predicate Formation inBangla’, in Aaron L. Halpern (ed.), The Proceedings of the Ninth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, pp. 443–458.

  • Roberts, Ian: 1991, ‘Excorporation and Minimality’, Linguistic Inquiry22, 209–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, Robert A.: 1990, ‘Yiddish Aspectology’, in Paul Wexler (ed.), Studies in Yiddish Linguistics, Max Niemeyer Verlag, Tügingen, pp. 143–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safir, Kenneth: 1995, ‘Covert Incorporation’, CLS31.

  • Schaechter, Mordche: 1951/1985, Aktionen im Jiddischen, unpublished 1951 Ph.D. dissertation, University of Vienna, University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaechter, Mordkhe: 1995, Yidish Tsvey(revised edition, originally published 1986), ISHI, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, Mona: 1990, ‘The Aspectual Content of Compound Verbs’, in Y. No and M. Libucha (eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, pp. 260–271.

  • Smith, Carlota S.: 1991, The Parameter of Aspect, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taube, Moshe: 1987, ‘The Development of Aspectual Auxiliaries in Yiddish’, Word38, 13–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis, Lisa deMena: 1992, ‘Inner Aspect and the Structure of VP’, unpublished manuscript, McGill University.

  • Verma, Manindra (ed.): 1993, Complex Predicates in South Asian Languages, Manohar, New Delhi.

  • Weinreich, Max: 1973, Geshikhte fun der yidisher sprakh, YIVO Institute for Jewish Research, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaretski, Ayzik: 1929, Yidishe Gramatik, Vilner Farlag, Vilna.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Linguistics, Morrill Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA

    Molly Diesing

Authors
  1. Molly Diesing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Diesing, M. Light verbs and the syntax of aspect in Yiddish. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 1, 119–156 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009751908064

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009751908064

Keywords

Search

Navigation