Sensitivity of normal theory methods to model misspecification in the calculation of upper confidence limits on the risk function for continuous responses
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Normal theory procedures for calculating upper confidence limits (UCL) on the risk function for continuous responses work well when the data come from a normal distribution. However, if the data come from an alternative distribution, the application of the normal theory procedures may lead serious over- or under-coverage depending upon the alternative distribution. In this paper we conduct simulation studies to investigate the sensitivity of three normal theory UCL procedures to departures from normality. Data from several gamma, reciprocal gamma, and lognormal distributions are considered. The normal theory procedures are applied to both the raw data and the log-transformed data.
- Banga, S.J., Patil, G.P., and Taillie, C. (1999) Continuous Dose Response Modeling and Methodology for Nonnormal Distributions with Emphasis on Gamma and Reciprocal Gamma Distributions, Technical Report 99-0402, Center for Statistical Ecology and Environmental Statistics, Department of Statistics, Penn State University, University Park, PA.
- Banga, S.J., Patil, G.P., and Taillie, C. (1999) Likelihood Contour and Lagrange Multiplier Method for the Calculation of Asymptotic Upper Confidence Limits on Risk Function for Quantitative Responses, Risk Analysis, Under Revision.
- Banga, S.J., Patil, G.P., and Taillie, C. (1999) Sensitivity of Normal Theory Methods to Model Misspecification in the Calculation of Upper Confidence Limits on the Risk Function for Continuous Responses, Technical Report 99-0403, Center for Statistical Ecology and Environmental Statistics, Department of Statistics, Penn State University, University Park, PA.
- Chen, J.J. and Gaylor, D.W. (1992) Dose Response Modeling of Quantitative Response Data for Risk Assessment. Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods, 21(8), 2367-81.
- Crump, K.S. (1995) Calculation of Benchmark doses from Continuous Data. Risk Analysis, 15, 79-89.
- Kimmel, C.A. and Gaylor, D.W. (1988) Issues in Qualitative and Quantitative Risk Analysis for Developmental Toxicity. Risk Analysis, 8, 15-20.
- Kodell, R.L. and West, R.W. (1993) Statistical Methods of Risk Assessment for Continuous Variables. Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods, 22(12), 3363-76.
- Kodell, R.L. and West, R.W. (1993) Upper Confidence Limits on Excess Risk for Quantitative Responses. Risk Analysis, 13(2), 177-82.
- Wolfram, S. (1996) The Mathematica Book, 3rd edition, Wolfram Media/Cambridge University Press.
- Sensitivity of normal theory methods to model misspecification in the calculation of upper confidence limits on the risk function for continuous responses
Environmental and Ecological Statistics
Volume 7, Issue 2 , pp 177-189
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- coverage probability
- dose-response models
- gamma distribution
- lognormal distribution
- reciprocal gamma distribution