A Flexible Approach to Time-varying Coefficients in the Cox Regression Setting Authors Daniel J. Sargent Cancer Center Statistics, Plummer 4 Mayo Clinic Article

DOI :
10.1023/A:1009612117342

Cite this article as: Sargent, D.J. Lifetime Data Anal (1997) 3: 13. doi:10.1023/A:1009612117342
Abstract Research on methods for studying time-to-event data (survival analysis) has been extensive in recent years. The basic model in use today represents the hazard function for an individual through a proportional hazards model (Cox, 1972). Typically, it is assumed that a covariate's effect on the hazard function is constant throughout the course of the study. In this paper we propose a method to allow for possible deviations from the standard Cox model, by allowing the effect of a covariate to vary over time. This method is based on a dynamic linear model. We present our method in terms of a Bayesian hierarchical model. We fit the model to the data using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. Finally, we illustrate the approach with several examples.

Hierarchical models Markov chain Monte Carlo Dynamic linear model Smoothing Survival analysis

This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.

References O.O. Aalen, “Nonparametric inference for a family of counting processes,”

Annals of Statistics
6 , 701–726, 1978.

MATH MathSciNet H. Akaike, “Information theory and an extension of the entropy maximization principle”, in Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Information Theory , eds. B.N. Petrov and R. Csak. Kiado: Akademica, 1973.

P.K. Anderson and R.D. Gill, “Cox's regression model for counting processes: A large sample study,”

Annals of Statistics
10 , 1100–1120, 1982.

MathSciNet D.R. Cox, “Regression models and life tables (with discussion),”

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B
34 , 187–220, 1972.

MATH D.R. Cox, “Partial Likelihood,”

Biometrika
62 , 269–275, 1975.

MATH MathSciNet CrossRef B. Efron, “The efficiency of Cox's likelihood function for censored data,”

Journal of the American Statistical Association
72 , 557–565, 1977.

MATH MathSciNet CrossRef D. Gamerman, “Dynamic Bayesian models for survival data,”

Applied Statistics
40 , 63–79, 1991.

MATH CrossRef A.E. Gelfand and A.F.M. Smith, “Sampling based approaches to calculating marginal densities,”

Journal of the American Statistical Association
85 , 398–409, 1990.

MATH MathSciNet CrossRef A. Gelman, G. Roberts, W. Gilks, “Efficient Metropolis jumping rules,” in Bayesian Statistics 5 , eds. J.O. Berger, J.M. Bernardo, A.P. Dawid, A.F.M. Smith, Oxford: University Press, 1996.

A. Gelman and D.B. Rubin, “Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences (with discussion),” Statistical Science
7 , 457–511, 1992.

I.J. Good and R.A Gaskins, “Density estimation and bump-hunting by the penalized likelihood method exemplified by scattering and meteorite data (with discussion),”

Journal of the American Statistical Association
75 , 42–56, 1980.

MATH MathSciNet CrossRef P.M. Grambsch and T.M. Therneau, “Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals,”

Biometrika
81 , 515–526, 1994.

MATH MathSciNet CrossRef R.J. Gray, “Flexible methods for analyzing survival data using splines, with applications to breast cancer prognosis,”

Journal of the American Statistical Association
87 , 942–951, 1992.

CrossRef R.J. Gray, “Spline-based tests in survival analysis,”

Biometrics
50 , 640–652, 1994.

MATH MathSciNet CrossRef T.J. Hastie and R.J. Tibshirani,

Generalized additive models , New York: Chapman and Hall, 1990.

MATH T.J. Hastie and R.J. Tibshirani, “Varying-coefficient models,”

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B
55 , 86-95, 1993.

MathSciNet S. Johansen, “An extension of Cox's regression model,”

International Statistical Review ,

51 , 165-174, 1983.

MATH MathSciNet CrossRef J.D. Kalbfleisch, “Nonparametric Bayesian analysis of survival time data,”

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B
40 , 214–221, 1978.

MATH MathSciNet J.D. Kalbfleisch and R.L. Prentice, The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data . New York: Wiley, 1978.

D.Y. Lin, “Goodness-of-fit for the Cox regression model based on a class of parameter estimators,”

Journal of the American Statistical Association
86 , 725–728, 1991.

MATH MathSciNet CrossRef D.V. Lindley and A.F.M Smith, “Bayes estimates for the linear model (with discussion),”

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B ,

34 , 1–41, 1972.

MATH MathSciNet P. Müller, “A generic approach to posterior integration and Gibbs sampling,” Technical Report 91-009, Department of Statistics, Purdue University.

F. O'sullivan, “Nonparametric estimation in the Cox model,”

The Annals of Statistics
21 , 124–145, 1993.

MATH MathSciNet D.J. Sargent, “A general framework for random effects survival analysis in the Cox proportional hazards setting,” Research Report 95–004, Division of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, 1995.

D. Schoenfeld, “Partial residuals for the proportional hazards regression model,”

Biometrika
69 , 239–241, 1982.

CrossRef A.F.M. Smith and G.O. Roberts, “Bayesian computation via the Gibbs sampler and related Markov chain Monte Carlo methods (with discussion),”

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B
55 , 3–23, 1993.

MATH MathSciNet T.M. Therneau, “A package of survival functions for S,” Technical Report No. 53, Section of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, 1994.

L. Tierney, “Markov chains for exploring posterior distributions (with discussion),”

Annals of Statistics
22 , 1701–1762, 1994.

MATH MathSciNet P.J.M. Verweij and H.C. van Houwelingen, “Time-dependent effects of fixed covariates in Cox regression,”

Biometrics
51 1550–1556, 1995.

MATH CrossRef M. West, P.J. Harrison, H.S. Migon, “Dynamic generalized linear models and Bayesian forecasting (with discussion),”

Journal of the American Statistical Association
80 , 73–97, 1985.

MATH MathSciNet CrossRef D.M. Zucker and A.F. Karr, “Nonparametric survival analysis with time-dependent covariate effects: a penalized partial likelihood approach,”

The Annals of Statistics
18 , 329–353, 1990.

MATH MathSciNet © Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997