Skip to main content
Log in

Relationship-Specific Investments and the Transfer Pricing Paradox

  • Published:
Review of Accounting Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The revised Treasury Regulations interpreting Internal Revenue Code Section 482 allow the use of profit-based transfer pricing methods, as well as the older methods based on prices from comparable transactions between independent parties. This paper compares the effects of price-based and profit-based transfer pricing methods on the allocation of taxable income in a model in which organization structure affects the level of relationship-specific investments made by vertically integrated groups and comparable independent firms. Analysis of the model shows that the price-based methods systematically allocates more taxable income to foreign subsidiaries and less to domestic parents than does the profit-based method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alchian, A., and H. Demsetz. (1972). “Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization.” American Economic Review 62, 777–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antle, R., and G. Eppen. (1985). “Capital Rationing and Organizational Slack in Capital Budgeting.” Management Science 31, 163–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chipty, T., and A. Witte. (1990). “Some Thoughts on Transfer Pricing.” Tax Notes 49, 1009–1024.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. (1937). “The Nature of the Firm.” Economica 4, 386–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copithorne, L. (1971). “International Corporate Transfer Prices and Government Policy.” Canadian Journal of Economics 4, 324–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diewert, W. (1985). “Transfer Pricing and Economic Efficiency.” In A. Rugman, and L. Eden (eds.), Multinationals and Transfer Pricing. New York: St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, L. (1985). “The Microeconomics of Transfer Pricing.” In A. Rugman, and L. Eden (eds.), Multinationals and Transfer Pricing. New York: St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, F. (1990). “Testimony of Fred T. Goldberg, Jr., Commissioner of Internal Revenue, before the Subcommittee on Oversight, House Ways and Means Committee on July 10, 1990.

  • Grossman, S., and O. Hart. (1986). “The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration.” Journal of Political Economy 94, 691–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halperin, R., and B. Srinidhi. (1987). “The Effects of the U.S. Income Tax Regulations' Transfer Pricing Rules on Allocative Efficiency.” The Accounting Review 62, 686–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halperin, R., and B. Srinidhi. (1996). “U.S. Income Tax Transfer Pricing Rules for Intangibles as Approximations of Arm's Length Pricing.” The Accounting Review 71, 61–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, D., and R. Sansing. (1998). “Distortions Caused by the Use of Arm's Length Transfer Prices.” Journal of the American Taxation Association 20 (Supplement), 40–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higinbotham, H., D. Asper, P. Stoffregen, and R. Wexler. (1987). “Effective Application of the Section 482 Transfer Pricing Regulations.” Tax Law Review 42, 295–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom, B., and J. Tirole. (1989). “The Theory of the Firm.” In R. Schmalensee and R.Willig (eds), Handbook of Industrial Organization, Volume 1. New York: North-Holland.

  • Horst, T. (1971). “Theory of the Multinational Firm: Optimal Behaviour Under Differing Tariff and Tax Rates.” Journal of Political Economy 79, 1059–1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hufbauer, G. (1992). U.S.Taxation of International Income: Blueprint for Reform. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joskow, P. (1985). “Vertical Integration and Long-term Contracts: The Case of Coal-burning Electric Generating Plants.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 2, 33–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langbein, S. (1989). “Transaction Cost, Production Cost, and Tax Transfer Pricing.” Tax Notes 45, 1391–1413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masten, S. (1984). “The Organization of Production: Evidence from the Aerospace Industry.” Journal of Law and Economics 1, 403–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteverde, K., and D. Teece. (1982). “Supplier Switching Costs and Vertical Integration in the Automobile Industry.” Bell Journal of Economics 13, 206–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. (1950). “The Bargaining Problem.” Econometrica 18, 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sansing, R. (1996). “Transfer Pricing and the Taxation of Natural Resource Extraction.” Journal of Energy Finance & Development 1, 71–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelanski, H., and P. Klein. (1995). “Empirical Research in Transaction Cost Economics: A Review and Assessment.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 11, 335–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuckey, J. (1983). Vertical Integration and Joint Ventures in the Aluminum Industry. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taly, M. (1996). “Comparison of CPM and TNMM Transfer Pricing Methods: A Point of View.” Tax Notes International 12, 351–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. (1997). “International Transfer Pricing Rules from a Canadian Perspective.” Tax Notes International 15, 297–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turro, J. (1994). “Transfer Pricing: U.S. Releases Final Transfer Pricing Regulations Under Section 482.” Tax Notes International 9, 79.

  • Williamson, O. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, P. (1993). “The Role of Taxes in Location and Sourcing Decisions.” In Studies in International Taxation. Aberto Giovannini, R. Glenn Hubbard, and Joel Slemrod (eds.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sansing, R. Relationship-Specific Investments and the Transfer Pricing Paradox. Review of Accounting Studies 4, 119–134 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009601102396

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009601102396

Keywords

Navigation